Lucy Craig is Jane Doe - 100% Verified logo Lucy Craig is Jane Doe - 100% Verified
THE RECORD · THE ARGUMENT · THE RESPONSE

Who Is
Jane Doe
Really?

Evidence. Due process. Competing narratives. The record deserves scrutiny.

Open the evidence libraryRead the argumentJoin the discussion
✍ Sign the petition
WHY THIS EXISTS

Controversial cases still require evidence, process, and room for dissent.

This site is built to present opposition, documentary material, competing interpretations, and public discussion without treating allegations as adjudicated facts. Court records, attributed reporting, editorial argument, and reader comments are labeled as different kinds of material.

REPORTING CREDIT

Reporting that helped frame the public questions

The links below are credited to Richard Luthmann / NY News Press. Linking or discussing them does not convert their assertions into findings of fact.

Richard Luthmann — Cornell Seven: Evidence Before Election Theater Psy-Op ↗Richard Luthmann — BREAKING: Cornell Seven Accuser Unmasked ↗NY News Press — Cornell Seven Accuser Unmasked ↗NY News Press — Cornell Seven Evidence ↗
LATEST

Articles & analysis

Rice Purity Quiz

Take the Rice Purity Quiz As If You Were Lucy Craig

We’ve recreated the 100-question Rice Purity Test, allowing you to explore it through the lens of the publicly available records, police reports, court...

2026-11-10Analysis

Rice Purity, Mom Lore, and Lucy Craig

One of the most revealing messages in the Cornell Seven controversy is also one of the most casually written. Understanding two pieces of Gen Z slang helps...

2026-11-08ARTICLE

Reproduction of Key Text Messages

Read the text exchanges reproduced here.

2026-11-08ARTICLE

The 20-Year Loophole?

Two recent court decisions, an expired ordinary filing deadline, questionable reliance on criminal statutes, and a conspicuously missing fifth cause of...

2026-11-05Legal Commentary

Lucy Craig Wants Another 60 Days. The Court Should Say No.

Nearly two years after the alleged events, Lucile H. Craig's attorneys want to delay Diego Sarabia's motion to dismiss—while defending a complaint that...

2026-11-05Opinion

BREAKING: Jacqueline Kelly, the Cornell Graduate Who Must Now Prove She Can Investigate Cornell

Letitia James has hired an outside lawyer to lead the Cornell 7 investigation. Her selection raises a rather inconvenient question: when does independence...

2026-11-04
PUBLIC RECORD

Documents should be inspectable, searchable, and quotable in context.

Every public Library item gets a dedicated page. PDFs are rendered responsively, OCR is searchable, video/audio transcripts are timestamped, and clicking a transcript segment jumps the media to that point.

Browse library

New docket entries · last 24 hours

Loading recent docket filings…

DISCUSSION

Topics controlled by the administrators; comments controlled by their authors.

A Place For Memes
This discussion forums is for all your Lucy Craig, Cornell 7, memes. We want to have the definitive collection of meme art about Lucy Craig.

Big Tish James
Should Big Tish James be involved in the investigation and prosecution of the Cornell 7?

Can a woman consent to sex if she is voluntarily intoxicated?
Lucy Craig engaged in voluntary consumption of alcohol and illegal substances. Is she capable of consent? And if not, are the men, who were also drinking and consuming illegal substances, according to public reporting, capable of consent? Can they claim that they were raped by Lucy Craig?

Did Lucy Craig Rape Those Drunken Boys?
Her texts say she was not drunk. The bar says she was not drunk. The boys were drunk. Did Lucy Craig (AKA "JANE DOE") rape those boys? Leave a comment with your opinion.

Discuss: Should Lucy Craig Sue Thomas Guiffra?
Thomas Guiffra's famefag attention seeking, publicity stunts have backfired. It is now known that he was leaking records related to the case (the poorly redacted afformation in support of proceeding as Jame Doe was only in possession of the person who filed it). He named a U.S. Active Service Marine, lied about a swat event, filed a fake DMCA in bad faith to this blog, named an incorrect person as a defendant, misrepresents New York's dram shop liability laws against Moonies, and named an entity that doesn't actually exists on paper. His hope was, similar to the Comb's cases, to throw shit against the wall, leak favorable documents, cancel anyone who speaks against his client, and sway the public sympathy. That backfired, with help from LucyCraog.blog. As her case becomes a comedy of errors, we ask you, should Lucile H. Craig sue Thomas Guiffra and his firm for malpractice?

Freedom of Speech
We do not care about your feelings, we do care about freedom of speech. Share and post any legal speech you want. Send us your images, videos, text messages, voice recordings or any other related material for immediate publication without censorship.

THE LATEST DISCUSSION

Latest comments

Loading latest comments…

PUBLIC DISCUSSION

Comments & replies

No account is required. Comment anonymously, or sign in with a pseudonymous account if you want to manage your comments later. Comments are user speech, not editorial findings.

Posting anonymously — no login required.
Optional: sign in or create a pseudonymous username to edit/delete your comments later.
@janedoe1 #3333
Blessedly, I work from home, and have the time to run a few lines of code on this blog when needed.
 
Speech will not be suppressed. My reaction time is can be less than a minute, unless I am sleeping.
 
Welcome to "PrincesaLand".
Comment attachment by janedoe1

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #3365
You genuinely need a larger single desk. More strength to you.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #3337
Please don't show us your basement
@janedoe1 #3319
If you are sensitive to loud noise, please cover your ears, we are doing a wee bit of a memorial scream...
 
Do these whackadoodles go home at night and think "what the fuck did i just accomplish?"
SAYg7bKx2q6LDTtX.mp4

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #3338
And of course,
They are all overweight lesbians.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3347
Probably some self-harm, eating disorders, PTSD, thyroid problems, and BPD on display there

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #3321
They go home and break a nail fingering themselves so hard for be such badass babes! And then go panting to the fridge for some ice cream. Just a bit of theatre and bragging rights.
Anonymous #3315
Diego was the one who allegedly started the assault, right? He's the one who grabbed her face and forced a kiss on her while she was hiding under the covers because others besides Matt and Jonathan (the initial fully consensual threesome) had started coming in? He was the one who presumably set the precedence that it was okay not to ask for consent from that point on?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3331
Her entire claim boils down to:
1 guy forcibly kissed me
1 guy I slept with kept reaching for my puss
1 guy slapped my ass really hard
A bunch of guys were in the room while I was naked and in my 2nd threesome.
I wasn’t really into my 3rd threesome of the night
I’m upset I was slut shamed on campus and in my sorority
I’m upset that the frat bros texted pics, texted bro smack, and told people about the night of endless threesomes.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3340
Ultimately, she abused drugs and alcohol, had ridiculous, "empowering"/pornstar sex that proves how open minded she is, but people weren't supposed to know, and slut shaming was a bit painful, and it turned out Matt didn't love her and, she wasn't allowed to do it all again at the next party. I will just be devastated if Cornell really did fuck up the investigations and things and she ends up a millionnaire.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3336
The grabby guy and the slappy guy were the same one who posted the invitation, and was supposed to be the sober monitor on the night. So a real cunt...but, in her words, she really enjoyed being with him and Matt, so all good.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3332
And I never should have let the room of guys snort product off my body
And I shouldn’t have gotten do fucked up.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3320
No, Male 7 grabbed her face and kissed her (and never actually got any further, else except possibly a chance to snort Ketamine off her). Diego was male 3, possibly the first to respond to the Free Pussy text. After Diego, more people come in and do ketamine. In her statement, it only gets a little murky around threesome number 3, which involves Matt, her friend and Lee (male 4) after taking her to another room.
@janedoe1 edited #3311
Good morning,
 
Overnight a laughably weak attempt to DDoS this site took place.
 
We suffered no damage and no compromise. Just a little downtime while the attempted attack was happening -I took this blog offline to ensure no compromise whatsoever while it was happening.
 
The lengths these folks will go to silence oppositional speech, ridiculous. Every platform that does not compitulate to censorship is attacked, harassed, doxxed, intimidated... we will not be silenced.
 
We apologize for the disruption and short downtime.
 
However, we learned a lesson, and we will have a backup server by the end of the day that will trigger in the event of another (inevitable) attempt to silence us.
 
Speech will not be silenced on this blog!
 
#IAmLucyCraigBlog

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #3330
Just goes to show that they know they can't succeed in the marketplace of ideas, they gotta censor dissent .

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #3317
I feel so bad for Lucy (the server, not the whore)! Gang raped by feminists
@janedoe1 edited #3302
Whackadoodles protest in support of Lucy Craig.
This is more of an October Surprise than in support of Lucy Craig.
d3LzV1PaXCynmiY7.mp4

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #3306
I bet these clowns don’t even care about the truth.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

P @pepeherman #3407
As if you do. You're defending the men as if your lives depended on it, totally ignoring their outright lies and their objectively disgusting actions that night, legal and illegal.
 
And you aren't even giving the victim a chance, nor are you saying anything productive about her relating to the case. All you've ever done is to label her a whore, well that's not evidence of anything.

↳ Reply to @pepeherman · Level 3

Anonymous #3542
Did you read this? Tell me about your thoughts.
PDF previewLucy_Craig_police_report_-_Full_-_Redacted

↳ Reply to @pepeherman · Level 3

Anonymous #3487
alleged victim...

↳ Reply to @pepeherman · Level 3

Anonymous #3414
the labels are based on her testamony... shes one saucy little bitch... with a serious personality disorder! Like wow, mental health really is important because these neurodiverse chicks aren't worth the fuck
Anonymous #3301
Train Doe.
Comment attachment by Anonymous
@janedoe1 #3292
Quick question,
 
What recommendations do you have to update / upgrade our blog?
 
Comments will remain in chronological order with the newest always on top (threads and replies), but maybe a search bar of the comments section of each page would be helpful?
 
What other ideas do you have to enhance our blog and community?
 
I read every comment, but in all honesty, I do so with an eye seeking and looking for bugs, suggestions, ideas, and concepts. I really just want to improve the blog in the best ways possible, so I am particularly attentive to comments that have suggestions and ideas. Now, I am directly asking for your suggestions and ideas.
 
Please leave your ideas and suggestions.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #3335
Mirror sites? And what advice can you give to someone who wants to set up a similar Lucy Craig website/discussion board?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

@janedoe1 #3339
Advice: it is not as easy as plug and play. Everyday it faces a new challenge. I work from home, have a high level of technical skills, so my reaction time is quicker. If you wanted to set up your own, focus on simplicity, not style or optics.
Mirrors: yes, i am incorporating a few mirrors to handle the load. When I started this, I was celebrating 3,000 page views, now we have surpassed 5,000,000 which is totally awesome but also where the simplicity comes in -it is lightweight and can handle the increased internet gangbang that it takes daily. Privacy, do not build in anything that can dox the visitors. There is no value or need for an independent blog to maintain metadata of the visitors. Simply count visitors if you want to see the stats, but do not log them. Ultimately you will face censorship attempts, from reports to every agency and server to subpoenas from attorneys. I've been setting up free speech platforms for years, which allows me to not be concerned about the reports, but take into consideration that reliance on third party services mean you could lose ehat you built in an instance. If you don't have the hardware or experience or thick skin, it will not work effectively.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 3

Anonymous #3341
I hope once Jane Doe is "officially" unmasked, people acknowledge sites like this... there is a very real story here about censorship and intimidation

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #3329
1. Maybe a section set aside just for Lucy Craig memes.
2. A timeline, with clickable links to supporting evidence.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #3309
Legal documents and verified screen shots separate from the memes

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #3305
Consolidate this to here https://lucycraig.blog/discuss
Anonymous #3277
Cornell bans all frat parties.
 
https://apnews.com/article/cornell-rape-investigation-frat-party-ban-686aaca2c81878f8cd771a0e3bdf7fa4
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3298
You know there'll be parties where they hand out cigs -- Loosie Parties...

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3287
Should simply burn fraternities and sororities to the ground. They are only there to exclude people, and create power dynamics.
 
You don’t need an exclusive party place in college to party.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3278
Is the reporter trying to be sarcastic.. nobody wants to gang bang that women

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3279
she be 🙄
Anonymous #3275
Scott Kretzschmar's lawyer claimed that Scott had only been in the room a couple of minutes and did not touch the victim.
 
Well here he is not only posting pictures of him doing exactly that, but also saying "came back for more". How do you people not catch these lies?
Snapchat_photos

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3308
These arent real, or mainstream media would be cumming in Its pants

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3289
The blurred out pictures tell us nothing,
The bro talk is just that, bro talk
It unclear who or what is in the pictures
And there is no attribution to who is posting the pic……
So all you are going off is your imagination
Anonymous #3250
The IP address of the admin is 172.67.185.84

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3271
67

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

@janedoe1 #3273
🤣

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3261
The 67 means he is a liberal, the 84 means he is uncircumcised and likes long qalks on the beach

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe1 edited #3253
Oh no, you doxxed me: https://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/172.67.185.84
@janedoe1 #3238
Lucy Craig's lolwyer may be the absolute dumbest lolwyer.
 
First he doesnt redact the full signature of her affidavit, leading us to discover her name.
Second he doxxed an Active Duty Marine and the Marine's home address, causing the court to abmonish him.
Third, today, he files a document with the full signature redacted for Lucy Craig, but the same PUBLIC RECORD does not redact her apartment address in New York City.
 
Literally cannot make this shit up. The document is taken directly from the court docket website, and is now public record, made public by her LOLWYER. It now remains public on this blog.
signature page
PDF previewComment attachment by janedoe1

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #3267
Trash riffle team eta beta pi, please proceed to the target

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3268
Bring me her panties

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #3243
I read somewhere she left NY and went back to AL.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3263
Alabanga

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3246
Could be. This is a motion in opposition to the defendant (Moonies) request for change of venue to Tompkins' County.
But, here is what I think, it is signed in New York (not in AL). If she was not physically present in NY when she signed, it should say "Alabama" and under penalty of perjury under the laws of Alabama...
I highly doubt she will have moved back to Alabama, given that this case will need her present to sign documents, and possibly present at court at any random time at all... but, I could be wrong, of course.
Anonymous #3233
She agreed to a threesome, then acquiesced to a second 3 some, then left the room with 2 guys, and had a 3rd 3some. Her biggest objection were all the gawkers that found there way into the room.
 
The argument that she was raped is based on her “epiphany “ after sustaining 2 weeks of slut shaming, and the public’s personal revulsion. But in that room, on that night, it sounds even from her own police report, that she was all in.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3262
Fyi, ingalls only posted the free pussy thing after/during the second threesome, so male 3 is on her (so to speak). He woke up to a n unplanned threesome and was excited about it - her words
Anonymous #3228
Whose puss is more blown out: Lucy Craig's or Hope Solo's?
Anonymous #3223
ol lucy needs money now that no guy wants a chick with a revolving door in her jeans, moms, raise your daughters better to not have a revolving door in her jeans, and dads, raise your boys better to not want to be a revolving door patron

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3231
Needs it to feed her ketamine habit
Anonymous #3212
If you spam this site, i will doxx you, knoxx you and coxx you
Anonymous #3196
Ultimately, the argument of people calling for the arrest and conviction of the cornell seven is that men need to be responsible to interpret and decide what women want, as womens' statements cannot trusted in the moment. So much for women's liberation.........

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3204
Read her civil case! Men failed her, these boys failed her, chi phi failed her, tridelta failed her, the house mother failed her, cornell failed her. Everyone, men, women and instituitions were supposed to prevent her from making her own decisions... Sounds like she shoukd have been in an asylum not a university

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3221
Money grab?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3206
She should sue her fucking parents too while she is at it
@janedoe1 #3191
> 4,000,000 page views.
Comment attachment by janedoe1

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #3318
Show unique visitors instead, it's much more telling.
 
Lifetime requests include every single page load. Every single refresh. It could be 100 total page refreshes for every unique user, and then the unique visitor count would only be 40 thou.
 
It also counts bots, crawlers, cURL requests, and all other kinds of user agents.
Anonymous #3175
Let's see if the matriarchal misandrist court system + media apparatus lets Train Doe get away with ruining 7 men's lives for degenerate but consensual sex. Imagine enthusiastically wanting to get dogged down by multiple guys at once and changing your story once your clique of fellow Liliths start giving you "heat" #herbodyherchoice #sexworkisrealwork #nastywhoresdeservedignitytoo
text_messages_2
Text_Messages_1

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3187
Confused. According to her police report she refused a foursome because she dislike anal, but now she wants 4? Did she anal after all

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3192
She was pissed off that some bros she didnt know well came to the room... You will see in her statements she felt embarressed by so many strangers seeing her poon. You will see from her subsequent texts, she was worried rumours would spread). Then she was univited from thw oarty, then she found out ingalls and newell were spreading the news, and so she started rewriting history

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous #3195
So unethical to spread the gang bang. What happens in Cornell, stays in Cornell.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous #3264
Spread your legs, not the gossip

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous #3220
This is why we can't have nice things

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous #3214
Yip, ruining it for other gangs
Anonymous #3162
Please stop censoring our speech.
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3193
You whackadoodle. Dont gang spam our forum

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3169
God does not give us free speech. The 3rd commandment is pure censorship: Thou shall not use the Lords' name in vain.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe1 edited #3168
We have restored your appropriate comment. Your MANY other comments commingling calls to cancel us, with third party site promotions will remain hidden for the reasons stated below.
And stop fucking spamming. It ruins the experience. Post it once, not 12 times, and be done.
Comment attachment by janedoe1
Comment attachment by janedoe1

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3166
Yeah read the comments of that petition. They either obviously did not at all read the documents independently; or they themselves are accusing others for raping, so the more likely explanation is that they know what’s happening, but they are false accusers themselves.
@janedoe1 #3158
Good morning, everyone.
 
Overnight, a whackadoodle decided to flood our comment section with repeated demands to “report” this site, while simultaneously promoting their own website, which appears to offer a decidedly one-sided version of the debate.
 
Let's clear up a couple of things.
 
First, self-promotion.
 
We have absolutely no problem with people sharing their own websites, articles, opinions, or competing platforms. We don't care which side of the argument you're on. If you have something to contribute, contribute it. Promote your website in good faith, and we'll happily leave it alone.
 
But repeatedly posting the same self-promotional nonsense, particularly when it's mixed with demands to silence this platform, crosses the line from participation into spam.
 
Second, cancel culture.
 
Calling for the censorship, suppression, or deplatforming of others is fundamentally opposed to everything this website stands for.
 
We believe cancel culture is a plague on society. It poisons public debate, obstructs the pursuit of truth, and undermines the very freedoms of speech and expression that we exist to defend.
 
Our policy is simple: If you use our comment section to organize or encourage the silencing of other voices, your comment will be removed in its entirety. Zero tolerance. We will not selectively edit your words to make them acceptable.
 
Let me be perfectly clear: Your speech belongs to you. Your opinions belong to you. And neither I nor the other administrators gives a damn whether we agree with them.
 
Criticize this website. Insult the administrators. Challenge our arguments. Defend the plaintiff. Defend the defendants. Call us idiots. Post something unpopular, offensive, or downright ridiculous.
 
We don't care.
 
That is precisely why this platform exists: to provide a place where all sides can speak, particularly when other platforms are busy deciding which opinions the public is permitted to hear.
 
But don't confuse our commitment to free expression with an obligation to host repetitive spam or campaigns designed to silence the very discussion we're protecting.
 
And one final point about moderation:
 
We do not casually remove, edit, or restrict comments. In fact, the decision to remove a comment is deliberately difficult.
 
Every administrator must unanimously agree that removal is justified. If even one administrator dissents, the comment stays. Period.
 
That's how seriously we take the principle of free expression, even when that expression is directed against us personally.
 
We're here to encourage debate, not manufacture consensus. We're here to examine competing claims, not dictate conclusions. And we're certainly not here to let the loudest censorship enthusiast decide who gets to speak.
 
Disagree all you want. Argue passionately. Be offensive. Be ridiculous. Just don't turn our forum into your personal spam campaign or your little cancel-culture crusade.
 
Now, back to our regularly scheduled chaos.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

@janedoe1 edited #3205
Also, we are reaching 4,500,000 page views. It would be illogical to think that someone has not tried to report us.
 
According to comments, we have been reported to:
 
  • Canadian Mounties
  • FBI
  • Lucy Craig's legal team
  • The internet police (IC3)
  • Various police departments
  • Various prosecutors
  • Various internet providers (willy nilly with the hopes that something will stick)
  • My mother
  • Someone named "fuck tard" (not entirely sure why)
 
This site is ENTIRELY self hosted in a country where it is ILLEGAL for platforms to censor -for example, if a platform censored this site it would interfere with my life in various ways, such as an example of the quality of my work, and there is no sec 230 where this site is hosted (in my parent's basement).
 
So, continued calls for cancel culture are hidden, but they are clearly ineffective. The person (probably a blue haired weirdo) surely is not the first to cry. If it were that easy, Lucy Craig's own lolwyer would have already had it pulled down by now.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 2

Anonymous #3222
What a mob