THE RECORD · THE ARGUMENT · THE RESPONSE

Who Is
Jane Doe
Really?

Evidence. Due process. Competing narratives. The record deserves scrutiny.

Open the evidence library Read the argument Join the discussion

WHY THIS EXISTS

Controversial cases still require evidence, process, and room for dissent.

This site is built to present opposition, documentary material, competing interpretations, and public discussion without treating allegations as adjudicated facts. Court records, attributed reporting, editorial argument, and reader comments are labeled as different kinds of material.

REPORTING CREDIT

Reporting that helped frame the public questions

The links below are credited to Richard Luthmann / NY News Press. Linking or discussing them does not convert their assertions into findings of fact.

Richard Luthmann — Cornell Seven: Evidence Before Election Theater Psy-Op ↗Richard Luthmann — BREAKING: Cornell Seven Accuser Unmasked ↗NY News Press — Cornell Seven Accuser Unmasked ↗NY News Press — Cornell Seven Evidence ↗

LATEST

Articles & analysis

Rice Purity Quiz

Take the Rice Purity Quiz As If You Were Lucy Craig

We’ve recreated the 100-question Rice Purity Test, allowing you to explore it through the lens of the publicly available records, police reports, court...

2026-11-10

Analysis

Rice Purity, Mom Lore, and Lucy Craig

One of the most revealing messages in the Cornell Seven controversy is also one of the most casually written. Understanding two pieces of Gen Z slang helps...

2026-11-08

ARTICLE

Reproduction of Key Text Messages

Read the text exchanges reproduced here.

2026-11-08

ARTICLE

The 20-Year Loophole?

Two recent court decisions, an expired ordinary filing deadline, questionable reliance on criminal statutes, and a conspicuously missing fifth cause of...

2026-11-05

Legal Commentary

Lucy Craig Wants Another 60 Days. The Court Should Say No.

Nearly two years after the alleged events, Lucile H. Craig's attorneys want to delay Diego Sarabia's motion to dismiss—while defending a complaint that...

2026-11-05

Opinion

BREAKING: Jacqueline Kelly, the Cornell Graduate Who Must Now Prove She Can Investigate Cornell

Letitia James has hired an outside lawyer to lead the Cornell 7 investigation. Her selection raises a rather inconvenient question: when does independence...

2026-11-04

PUBLIC RECORD

Documents should be inspectable, searchable, and quotable in context.

Every public Library item gets a dedicated page. PDFs are rendered responsively, OCR is searchable, video/audio transcripts are timestamped, and clicking a transcript segment jumps the media to that point.

Browse library

New docket entries · last 24 hours

Loading recent docket filings…

DISCUSSION

Topics controlled by the administrators; comments controlled by their authors.

A Place For Memes
This discussion forums is for all your Lucy Craig, Cornell 7, memes. We want to have the definitive collection of meme art about Lucy Craig.

Big Tish James
Should Big Tish James be involved in the investigation and prosecution of the Cornell 7?

Can a woman consent to sex if she is voluntarily intoxicated?
Lucy Craig engaged in voluntary consumption of alcohol and illegal substances. Is she capable of consent? And if not, are the men, who were also drinking and consuming illegal substances, according to public reporting, capable of consent? Can they claim that they were raped by Lucy Craig?

Did Lucy Craig Rape Those Drunken Boys?
Her texts say she was not drunk. The bar says she was not drunk. The boys were drunk. Did Lucy Craig (AKA "JANE DOE") rape those boys? Leave a comment with your opinion.

Discuss: Should Lucy Craig Sue Thomas Guiffra?
Thomas Guiffra's famefag attention seeking, publicity stunts have backfired. It is now known that he was leaking records related to the case (the poorly redacted afformation in support of proceeding as Jame Doe was only in possession of the person who filed it). He named a U.S. Active Service Marine, lied about a swat event, filed a fake DMCA in bad faith to this blog, named an incorrect person as a defendant, misrepresents New York's dram shop liability laws against Moonies, and named an entity that doesn't actually exists on paper. His hope was, similar to the Comb's cases, to throw shit against the wall, leak favorable documents, cancel anyone who speaks against his client, and sway the public sympathy. That backfired, with help from LucyCraog.blog. As her case becomes a comedy of errors, we ask you, should Lucile H. Craig sue Thomas Guiffra and his firm for malpractice?

Freedom of Speech
We do not care about your feelings, we do care about freedom of speech. Share and post any legal speech you want. Send us your images, videos, text messages, voice recordings or any other related material for immediate publication without censorship.

THE LATEST DISCUSSION

Latest comments

Loading latest comments…

PUBLIC DISCUSSION

Comments & replies

No account is required. Comment anonymously, or sign in with a pseudonymous account if you want to manage your comments later. Comments are user speech, not editorial findings.

Anonymous2026-10-13 13:39 UTC #3156

The petition that I am referring to below does NOT call for the cancellation of anything or anyone, it's strictly a petition to support the potential victim of rape.

Change.org: become one of the over 68000 people to sign a petition supporting the victim in this case.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe12026-10-13 14:02 UTC edited #3161

The comments like the ones calling to report the site will remain hidden.

We did find that one of the comments that was mixed with the calls for cancel culture did not include calls for cancel culture, so it has been restored.

Given the volume of comments (likely) you have made calling for people to report our site, the accidental inclusion of ONE acceptable comment by you for removal is insignificant. We apologize nevertheless.

If you want to report this site to the internet police because it offends your sensitivities, while engaging in and using it's audience for self promotion (ironic) do so elsewhere.

If you want to use the site for legitimate debate, reference, and even third party resources, do so.

If you mix the two, we will not be bothered with editing your comments, we will simply hide them because you are speaking out of both sides of your ass - calling to cancel our site, while also patently using our site to self-promote your own agenda, websites, or whatever.

Again, we apologize that ONE of your legitimate, standalone, comments got mixed up in your spam and cancel culture rampage when we had to hide the comments (not "deleted"). We have no way of identifying specific anonymous users, instead we have to do our best to find the offending comments on a individual comment level, and the sheer volume of your spam and cancel culture calls, led us to make ONE mistaken hidden comment. So again we apologize profusely and have restored that particular comment, not your other ones calling for us to be cancelled in the same self-hypocritical promotional paragraph.

As such, the comments calling for cancel culture remains hidden, the standalone comment self promoting your change.org petition and another website has been restored with our apologies. Two examples are attached. The comment that calls for our cancel culture that mixes your self promotion, and the standalone self promotion comment, to show the difference. Standalone, fine (but please don't spam it as you continue to do), mix it with calls to cancel our site, and the whole comment will be deleted.

We operate with full transparency here, and decisions will be explained, justified, here in the comments section if requested, as you have done.

Anonymous2026-10-13 13:21 UTC #3144

Moderator, How do you decide what comments to keep vs which ons you delete? Because you are clearly deleting comments / replies.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 13:25 UTC #3150

that would be surprising, because there is a shit-ton of stuff on here supporting her, mocking the operators, etc... maybe you feel in to a k-hole and hallucinated the whole thing?

Anonymous2026-10-13 13:19 UTC #3142

The site owner is deleting comments mentioning legitimate websites and petitions supporting the victim.

In other words he's silencing and censoring Jane Doe supporters, this does not align with the blog owners own expressed goal of a space where all speech is allowed, with total disregard for anyone's feelings. To the contrary it seems like any speech that feels remotely uncomfortable to the owner is silenced, suppressed or in this case straight up censored and deleted.

This will likely also be deleted, proving my point.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe12026-10-13 13:23 UTC edited #3145

I am deleting your comments that call for cancel culture. Also, if you want to spam some other website, do it on other platforms, this is not a self promotional comment section. Do that on social media, it ruins the experience for everyone.

Make whatever reports your simple-minded self must, but you will not promote your censorship on this site.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-13 15:07 UTC #3171

So much for the tolerant Left...

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-13 13:26 UTC #3152

Yes, the only speech should be illegal is the speech that tries to eliminate others’ speech.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-13 13:26 UTC #3151

Blah blah blah

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-13 13:28 UTC #3155

You should only have free speech when you don’t try to cancel others’ free speech.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous2026-10-13 13:41 UTC #3157

Ok, so by your logic the site owner should not have free speech, because he's cancelling ours?

We dont even call for cancellations or anything, we're here engaging with you guys and your perspective, aren't we?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 5

Anonymous2026-10-13 14:16 UTC #3164

Nope, cancelling cancellers is good.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 5

@janedoe12026-10-13 13:56 UTC #3160

Would you like me to post your comments, in full? You literally posted calls to report this site to various alleged providers for the purposes of canceling the site.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-13 13:28 UTC #3154

So you support censorship..... sad.

Anonymous2026-10-13 13:15 UTC #3141

Read her report to Cornell, posted on this site. She clearly states she told these "bros" she didn't want to do some things, and they complied. She never asked to leave and never asked for help (even in her 3:05am text). Some frat bros even threw other guys out of the room that were there gawking. Is she a victim? Yes. Was she raped? Apparently she has come to that conclusion. Are these guys rapists? Doesn't look that way. Sadly, everyone is a victim in this story.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 13:21 UTC #3143

She enjoyed a gang bang night, hard to say she is a victim. But she is indeed a victim of being judged as a slut by sorority sis.

Anonymous2026-10-13 13:10 UTC #3140

If you want to support the victim in this case, you can go to cornellseven.com, or directly to change.org, and become one of the currently 69,014 verified signatories in supporting the Cornell vicimg Jane Doe.

The petition is titled "Cornell alumni supporting Jane Doe".

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 19:10 UTC #3225

Your website is citing full of reporters’ interpretations. Is this AI slop? I can’t even find her original police report pdfs.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

@janedoe12026-10-13 19:24 UTC edited #3229

All you have to do is type "police" into the search on the library page...

Or for that matter when you comment click Choose from existing library, and search "police" and it will attach -as i am doing now.

Or, check the direct URL: https://lucycraig.blog/media/261

Lucy_Craig_police_report_-_Full_-_Redacted

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 14:33 UTC #3167

Cornellseven illustrates everything that is wrong in with this story. It publicly sentences 7 (barely) men to a lifetime of ridicule and shame, without a trial, or a conviction. By presenting only one side of the story, and without an exploration of shared guilt and dual victimhood, it has more in common with fascist propaganda than the democratic ideal of free speech and public discourse. Avoid.

Anonymous2026-10-13 12:14 UTC #3131

If being drunk means you can’t give consent to sex,

Then 2/3rds of college undergrads are rapists,

Regardless of their gender.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 12:23 UTC #3135

If anything tat says more about how fucked up our society is than it says about this case.

That she was drunk isn't even the big problem here, the biggest problem is what the 7 did. It wasn't just another casual sexual encounter, it was a fucking "open shop" for them to just "whip it out" to take advantage of and fuck a woman who was drunk and drugged out of her mind.

She wasn't just drunk, she was very drunk and very high. Yes, they were drunk and high too, but they were the ones taking advantage of her, and being drunk and high is not an excuse for that, there is never an excuse for that.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-13 13:24 UTC #3147

WDYM taking advantage of her. She sucked so many dicks, did ketamine of others’ dick, banged so many times, and importantly, every time when she says no the boys stopped, such as foursome, anal… She was clearly enjoying

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-13 17:36 UTC #3211

Our bodies our choices

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-13 15:31 UTC #3180

If Lucy Craig had as many pricks sticking out of her as she's had stuck in her, she'd be a porcupine

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 12:20 UTC #3133

You're only allowed to show men are evil oppressors and women are innocent victims. Delete this.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

C @cornellseven.com2026-10-13 12:27 UTC #3136

Nobody is saying this. You're arguing against a straw-man opponent that you made up in your own mind.

We're simply arguing that she was taken advantage of based on the evidence that we have seen. Just calling us feminists or misandrists is not a counter argument, if anything it shows shows how wrong you guys are because you're unable to make actual arguments to support your claims.

↳ Reply to @cornellseven.com · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-13 12:57 UTC #3138

Read her report to Cornell, posted on this site. She clearly states she told these "bros" she didn't want to do some things, and they complied. She never asked to leave and never asked for help (even in her 3:05am text). Some frat bros even threw guys out of the room that were there gawking. Is she a victim? Yes. Was she raped? Apparently whe has come to that conclusion. Are these guys rapists? Doesn't look that way.

Anonymous2026-10-13 12:08 UTC #3128

What should be a serious discussion about consent, right to privacy, biased narratives, public rush to judgement, slut shaming, and college / Greek culture……..

Falls into the abyss of right wing misogynists, and left wing man haters.

Anonymous2026-10-13 12:08 UTC #3127

What should be a serious discussion about consent, right to privacy, biased narratives, public rush to judgement, slut shaming, and college / Greek culture……..

Falls into the abyss of right wing misogynists, and left wing man haters.

Anonymous2026-10-13 12:08 UTC #3126

The "evidence" that supposedly shows her texting her friends while it happened are bogus. Just read the time stamps of the messages, 6pm, 9pm that was hours before the alleged assault took place. Maybe, just maybe, could you make the argument that they had began the consensual threesome at that time (even that is a stretch), but to imply that they took place when more guys had joined without consent, that's an outright lie.

And that they are supposed to prove that she was sober when it took place, fuck off, as I said it was hours before it happened, you can go from completely sober to piss drunk in half an hour.

It's clear you guys are grasping at straws here to try to make her look bad, so desperate it's sad.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 12:10 UTC #3130

She replied to a text from her sorry sister at 3:05 am.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-13 12:17 UTC #3132

What does that prove though? That a heavily intoxicated and drugged woman texted her sister, that's all that it proves.

We have all been very drunk at least once in our life, and you know damn well that when we're that intoxicated we dont know left from right, we cant judge things from an objective standpoint. We could get ran over by a motherfucking car and it's possible that we wouldn't register that as a bad thing until we've sobered up.

A member of the Wu Tang Clan cut his own dick off at a party, that's how messed up in the head we can get on alcohol and drugs.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 12:09 UTC #3129

I'm sorry if I came off as rude there, I get that remaining civil is best to get ones point across, but I just think it's so disgusting to do this to a potential rape victim. Like even devils like Putin and Netanyahu wouldn't have the chutzpah to target an individual victim like this, even they have more of a heart than this.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-14 00:00 UTC #3276

Putin trafficks kids (thats what his arrest warrant is for btw) and netanyahus boys shoot kids playing soccer... You have no idea how cruel the world is. That being said, read her testamony, and then decide how much sympathy she needs

Anonymous2026-10-13 09:40 UTC #3107

Paris Paloma fans will never admit they were wrong. If the timeframe of how Jane Doe changed her mind doesn't set off alarm bells, her text messages, the fact she did exactly what she accused the men of doing, what more do you want?

Anonymous2026-10-13 07:06 UTC #3081

Go on Bing or Google right now and ask, "Did Cornell's Jane Doe text her roommate on the night in question?" ... you will get a fucked up reply saying there is no evidence. Scary shit! Bing and google probably represent 90% of searches, they are actually complicit in the trial by media

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 08:05 UTC #3094

Google is completely compromised to the left

Anonymous2026-10-13 05:08 UTC #3063

I must say, ive been googling tri delta to see what its all about and it looks incredibly sweet, and wholesome. Seeing them reaching out to her and her (a sober monitor having a drug fueled gangbang) saying "idk" just shows she didnt fit in there

Anonymous2026-10-13 04:59 UTC #3061

What was that dirty cunts name? The one who shat on the bed then accussed Johnny Depp of rape? You cunts were supposed to remember that incident before blindly believing the next high profile accussation. If you dont read the evidence, i hope someone shits in your bed

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 06:16 UTC #3068

Amber Turd

Anonymous2026-10-13 04:55 UTC #3060

Serious issue, if someone gets a user name, it cant be "anonymous", or allow them to change earlier posts without it saying "editted" , some gaylord fokker posted a comment, got replies, then changed the initial post... Thats abusing the system (just like Lucy actually)

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe12026-10-13 11:47 UTC #3121

Thank you. I don't know if "anonymous" is an username now or not, but I have implemented a small change that will display the word "edited" after the date and time stamp if a comment is edited moving forward.

Anonymous2026-10-13 04:34 UTC #3056

How many times did she come?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 11:41 UTC #3119

Why would it matter? Reaching orgasm when raped is common, it does not mean that it was consensual or that the victim wanted or enjoyed it.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 10:07 UTC #3108

Did the boys come inside or where

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-13 10:22 UTC #3110

She might have ingested second-hand ketamine from three bros!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-13 10:22 UTC #3109

She might have ingested second-hand ketamine from three bros!

Anonymous2026-10-13 02:19 UTC #3023

She mentions multiple times in this report that she was extremely intoxicated and denied them, told them “no” so many times and it’s so obvious these boys were pressing her so hard. She did so many things that would make me think “ok I’m going to leave this person alone.” She was extremely intoxicated in a room full of men. She was scared. She said she had never been that fucked up in her life. She was taken advantage of there’s literally no denying that. These boys should have left her alone when they noticed how fucked up she was. Fucking creeps

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 04:25 UTC #3052

She says mildly and voluntarily intoxicated, actually, and she just swatted a hand away before round two... Maybe still sensitive from her orgasm

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 02:42 UTC #3028

Everytime she said no it was respected, it's when she said something vague like "I'm tired" that they'd press her. I'm not saying they weren't creeps, everyone in that room was a total degenerate.

Also if she was raped bc she was so heavily intoxicated, are you aware that she admitted to having sex with a guy who was passing out? Why aren't you saying she should have left them alone?

Typical rules for thee not for me.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-13 11:44 UTC #3120

Clearly not, else she wouldn't have said it was rape.

Anonymous2026-10-13 01:58 UTC #3020

Matthew Ingalls is accusing Lucy Craig of pegging him in the ass while he was unconscious.

#JusticeForMatthewIngalls

And #JusticeForMatthewIngalls the US Marine who was doxxed by Lucy Craig's lolwyer.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 03:59 UTC #3037

Matty boy is an idiot, because her was advertising her, so while that is not rape, if he did file a complaint, it now looks like he was trying to get revenge by embarressing her. He is going to pay out of his gaping ass in the civil court

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 02:00 UTC #3021

🤣

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-13 09:02 UTC #3105

Teach your kids morality...and how to shave, ffs

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-13 04:32 UTC #3054

Matt and Jonathan werent rapists, but they did traumatise her with this evening because Matts bumhole was still burning and he wanted revenge, and Jonathan is just a nascent rapist (he was the one hitting her). Those two will pay out in the civil case.

Anonymous2026-10-13 01:44 UTC #3019

The average angry female commenter gives fat and unattractive man hating whale yet their only rebuttal is "you're an incel with a small dick"

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 19:08 UTC #3224

…And your only rebuttal is calling people fat? That makes you part of the problem, you hypocritical dumbass. Sounds like you’re projecting so the “fatties” must have really clocked you.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-16 00:24 UTC #3649

Only rebuttal? I said they were acting on emotions and had no rebuttal. "Projecting" is such a boring one to come up with btw. I'm a fellow woman! But if I was an incel with a small dick that doesn't make Lucy a victim.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 11:50 UTC #3122

Nope, we're actually the only ones coming with coherent takes and valid evidence. You people can only come with some bullshit like "some of the men were too drunk to consent, that means the victim raped her perpetrators". Like nobody with half a brain would ever buy that.

The strongest photo evidence that exists are these pictures, they imply that they took advantage of her while she was passed out, or at the very least way too incapacitated for it to ever be okay to do anything to her.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-17 01:08 UTC #3774

I checked these photos are FAKE!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-16 00:29 UTC #3650

"some of the men were too drunk to consent, that means the victim raped her perpetrators" Like nobody with half a brain would ever buy that." Actually Lucy would, since she says they should have known she couldn't consent based on her slurred words, surely she should know the fact she had sex with a man passing out first (based on her police report) is wrong. If she wants them held to a standard she should be held to the exact same one.

Not only do I not not if these pics are real but we clearly can't see what they depict or when. Not only is "gone" vague but didn't she mention she ended up sleeping there? What do you think you're proving? That is not a smoking gun lol.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 04:14 UTC #3043

Thats basically it, everyone who supports her will not referencw her statement or engage with the details, they just go full militant dyke. The reason women like this dont rape is because they dont have dicks, but if they can hurt a man in someother way, they will do anything to acheive that

@janedoe12026-10-13 00:44 UTC #2984

As we have previously said, Lucy Craig was texting her roommates during the drug fueled gangbang. TmZ just published the texts.

She was texting coherently, without any issue around the time she was snorting ket off the dicks of the frat boys.

Some of the boys on the other hand seem to be extremely inebriated and could not have consented, and thus were raped by Lucy Criag.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 01:31 UTC #3013

Lucy allegedly started drinking Tito's Vodka directly from the bottle around 7pm. These don't seem inebriated text.

Further, the roommate was texting about her not coming home, offered a uber, doordash, and so on, and she was seemingly coherent.

Throughout the night, they exchanged many texts, she was not so drunk as to being unable to comprehend the events of the night.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-13 03:57 UTC #3036

Thank you! Ive been looking for this! She said in her statement that she couldnt reach her pho e, but here she is having a chat! Caught in a lie, and this was the perfect chance to ask someone to come fetch her before gang bang number three. Fucking narcissist!

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 01:16 UTC #2997

https://www.tmz.com/2026/10/12/cornell-jane-doe-text-exchange/

Can someone explain that post…

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-13 09:06 UTC #3106

Even Jane Doe can't explain it

Anonymous2026-10-13 00:05 UTC #2980

Maybe get raped and see how it feels. You know what this actually made me do? Reach out to the guy who did this to me 22 years ago in college to have a discussion about what it did to me. So go fuck yourselves. I’ve been SAd by 20 people. Not “crying rape.” No. Real shit. And I only reported ONE. And it's literally on Netflix. We actually don’t know what to do in that moment most of the time, and sometimes, it happens so often by you fucks, we literally just start believing that it’s kind of normal because this kind of shit y’all are promoting MAKES IT NORMAL. Going through the immediate violence is safer than what could happen next, so we shut down and die inside. Fuck you.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 04:01 UTC #3038

Whatever happened to you doesnt prove she was raped... You silly cunt

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 03:03 UTC #3033

"I'll take things that never happened for 200, Alex..."

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 01:33 UTC #3015

Whats the netflix called?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 01:30 UTC #3011

cry harder you stupid bitch

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 01:17 UTC #2998

SA by 20 ppl? By the same standard as Lucy?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 00:50 UTC #2986

Wow I'm sure he was shivering in his boots when you reached out 22 years later. SA'ed by 20 ppl and only reported one? I'm sure 0 of those people went on to SA someone else and u didn't aid in that. What Netflix did it end up on? You got the credentials? Lets see em.

I was raped, straight up. I said no, got beaten, intoxicated, all the terrible stuff, he was convicted. You want me to go fuck myself bc I don't support Jane Doe? If you can say no and choose not to say no stop wasting everyone's time and painting innocent ppl as rapists, that's more to Jane than you idk your situation but you seem like an insufferable person based on this comment. You're not the only victim stop playing the victim card, it's happened to a lot of us, shut up.

Who IsJane DoeReally?

Controversial cases still require evidence, process, and room for dissent.

Reporting that helped frame the public questions

Articles & analysis

Take the Rice Purity Quiz As If You Were Lucy Craig

Rice Purity, Mom Lore, and Lucy Craig

Reproduction of Key Text Messages

The 20-Year Loophole?

Lucy Craig Wants Another 60 Days. The Court Should Say No.

BREAKING: Jacqueline Kelly, the Cornell Graduate Who Must Now Prove She Can Investigate Cornell

Documents should be inspectable, searchable, and quotable in context.

New docket entries · last 24 hours

Topics controlled by the administrators; comments controlled by their authors.

Latest comments

Comments & replies

Who Is
Jane Doe
Really?