Lucy Craig is Jane Doe - 100% Verified logo Lucy Craig is Jane Doe - 100% Verified
THE RECORD · THE ARGUMENT · THE RESPONSE

Who Is
Jane Doe
Really?

Evidence. Due process. Competing narratives. The record deserves scrutiny.

Open the evidence libraryRead the argumentJoin the discussion
✍ Sign the petition
WHY THIS EXISTS

Controversial cases still require evidence, process, and room for dissent.

This site is built to present opposition, documentary material, competing interpretations, and public discussion without treating allegations as adjudicated facts. Court records, attributed reporting, editorial argument, and reader comments are labeled as different kinds of material.

REPORTING CREDIT

Reporting that helped frame the public questions

The links below are credited to Richard Luthmann / NY News Press. Linking or discussing them does not convert their assertions into findings of fact.

Richard Luthmann — Cornell Seven: Evidence Before Election Theater Psy-Op ↗Richard Luthmann — BREAKING: Cornell Seven Accuser Unmasked ↗NY News Press — Cornell Seven Accuser Unmasked ↗NY News Press — Cornell Seven Evidence ↗
LATEST

Articles & analysis

Rice Purity Quiz

Take the Rice Purity Quiz As If You Were Lucy Craig

We’ve recreated the 100-question Rice Purity Test, allowing you to explore it through the lens of the publicly available records, police reports, court...

2026-11-10Analysis

Rice Purity, Mom Lore, and Lucy Craig

One of the most revealing messages in the Cornell Seven controversy is also one of the most casually written. Understanding two pieces of Gen Z slang helps...

2026-11-08ARTICLE

Reproduction of Key Text Messages

Read the text exchanges reproduced here.

2026-11-08ARTICLE

The 20-Year Loophole?

Two recent court decisions, an expired ordinary filing deadline, questionable reliance on criminal statutes, and a conspicuously missing fifth cause of...

2026-11-05Legal Commentary

Lucy Craig Wants Another 60 Days. The Court Should Say No.

Nearly two years after the alleged events, Lucile H. Craig's attorneys want to delay Diego Sarabia's motion to dismiss—while defending a complaint that...

2026-11-05Opinion

BREAKING: Jacqueline Kelly, the Cornell Graduate Who Must Now Prove She Can Investigate Cornell

Letitia James has hired an outside lawyer to lead the Cornell 7 investigation. Her selection raises a rather inconvenient question: when does independence...

2026-11-04
PUBLIC RECORD

Documents should be inspectable, searchable, and quotable in context.

Every public Library item gets a dedicated page. PDFs are rendered responsively, OCR is searchable, video/audio transcripts are timestamped, and clicking a transcript segment jumps the media to that point.

Browse library

New docket entries · last 24 hours

Loading recent docket filings…

DISCUSSION

Topics controlled by the administrators; comments controlled by their authors.

A Place For Memes
This discussion forums is for all your Lucy Craig, Cornell 7, memes. We want to have the definitive collection of meme art about Lucy Craig.

Big Tish James
Should Big Tish James be involved in the investigation and prosecution of the Cornell 7?

Can a woman consent to sex if she is voluntarily intoxicated?
Lucy Craig engaged in voluntary consumption of alcohol and illegal substances. Is she capable of consent? And if not, are the men, who were also drinking and consuming illegal substances, according to public reporting, capable of consent? Can they claim that they were raped by Lucy Craig?

Did Lucy Craig Rape Those Drunken Boys?
Her texts say she was not drunk. The bar says she was not drunk. The boys were drunk. Did Lucy Craig (AKA "JANE DOE") rape those boys? Leave a comment with your opinion.

Discuss: Should Lucy Craig Sue Thomas Guiffra?
Thomas Guiffra's famefag attention seeking, publicity stunts have backfired. It is now known that he was leaking records related to the case (the poorly redacted afformation in support of proceeding as Jame Doe was only in possession of the person who filed it). He named a U.S. Active Service Marine, lied about a swat event, filed a fake DMCA in bad faith to this blog, named an incorrect person as a defendant, misrepresents New York's dram shop liability laws against Moonies, and named an entity that doesn't actually exists on paper. His hope was, similar to the Comb's cases, to throw shit against the wall, leak favorable documents, cancel anyone who speaks against his client, and sway the public sympathy. That backfired, with help from LucyCraog.blog. As her case becomes a comedy of errors, we ask you, should Lucile H. Craig sue Thomas Guiffra and his firm for malpractice?

Freedom of Speech
We do not care about your feelings, we do care about freedom of speech. Share and post any legal speech you want. Send us your images, videos, text messages, voice recordings or any other related material for immediate publication without censorship.

THE LATEST DISCUSSION

Latest comments

Loading latest comments…

PUBLIC DISCUSSION

Comments & replies

No account is required. Comment anonymously, or sign in with a pseudonymous account if you want to manage your comments later. Comments are user speech, not editorial findings.

Posting anonymously — no login required.
Optional: sign in or create a pseudonymous username to edit/delete your comments later.
Anonymous #3590
Sigh, this is the shit part, now they seem to have released all they are going to, and we just have to wait.
Anonymous #3588
You are all Epstein supporters.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3589
You are a Crystal Mangum supporter

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3593
Red herring
Anonymous #3555
All these comments are coming from the cesspool and male activity; so far they can even admit it to themselves—everything that is wrong with the internet. Just stupid. As if the "porn world" has infiltrated regular discourse. shut this site down.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3729
Porn is the problem! but the good news is, bukkakenightmare.com have banned Ms Craigs account.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3842
Starring Lucy Craig
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3557
Cry harder bitch 🤡

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3562
these kind of "clown emojis" the whole audacious behavior is so stupid. at the end of the day, if you are guilty for rape youre getting the death penalty, if youre against that, we are looking for you.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3560
Call me a bitch to my face, freak. I will knock you out so hard for being the sick and lost pup you are, with joy.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous #3716
Get down on your knees where you really belong and put that big blabby mouth of yours to good use for once

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous #3643
Threatening violence over words ^ Maybe you could knock him out I bet you're huge.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous #3561
eat 7 more dicks cunt

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous #3564
Nice. waiting for an intellectual response, but you are happier as the basement rapist, i can find you.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 5

Anonymous #3644
You're claiming a woman was raped? But then you accuse randoms on the internet of rape when one of their critiques are that the word rape is being watered down, thanks for proving their point I guess.
Anonymous #3554
This is the dumbest thing I have found online. Don't know who runs it, but they've outdone themselves in the field of bafoonery. They want to have an opinion against a woman so badly, I don't think they have ever had one good day with one not to feel some anger towards the entire species of women. This is pathetic. Very stupid, very low ball, and in extremely bad taste.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3645
"They want to have an opinion against a woman so badly" incel simp or femcel feminist detected opinion rejected.
 
"the entire species of women" definitely incel simp...?
@janedoe1 #3550
Good morning.
 
We have reproduced the core code of this site, so that we can stand up new sites when new topics receive cenorship to such scope and level.
 
Lucy Criag's name being censored has given way and inspiration for us to continue the censorship free discussion in the true spirit of freedom of expression anytime there is a public debate that is being suppressed at such extreme levels you cannot even manually search a name into social media or search engines.
 
Speech will prevail.
 
Lucy Criag has gangbanged her way into the public conversation, with or without consent, we will expand that orgy of interest into other censored topics.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #3722
It's always worth remembering, that it wasn't the orgy she was happy to carry out. It was the attempt to
reframe it as though she was a victim and weaponize it.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #3721
It's always worth remembering, that it wasn't the orgy she was happy to carry out. It was the attempt to
reframe it as though she was a victim and weaponize it.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #3720
Gonna have to do one so people can speak out against 12000 kids murdered in gaza! The UK is starting to censor that now

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #3556
I can say that Lucy's name and this site's URL are peppered all over Facebook. Anyone perusing the comments section of a Cornell 7 post quickly see Lucy's name and "lucycraig.blog"
 
The dyke has broken.
Anonymous #3548
LucyCraig Train...
(Wonder what Suno would do with it)
 
🎵 Runaway train, party at the frat
Drunk and horny, taking shots to the back 🎵
Anonymous #3546
It would be refreshing if, for once, we didn't have a "victim" who spread her legs like peanut butter... #LucyCraig
Anonymous #3535
After reading her statement to the Cornell Police, it’s clear this is a textbook example of how slut shaming and personnel regret leads someone to cry rape.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3539
Slut (archaic: slattern) is an English-language term for a person, usually a woman, who is sexually promiscuous or considered to have loose sexual morals.
 
She is.
Anonymous #3534
I wonder if all the women that slut shamed Jane Doe:
1. Feel guilty they have brought this public scrutiny on her
2. Are having second thoughts about their claims of her rape after having read her Cornell police report
3. Have any remorse at all of forever ruing the lives of 7 frat bros and one woman, that may be guilty of being gross, but not rapists
4. Are so blinded by their personal pain and self-righteousness that they don’t really care about the truth
5. Secretly hate Jane Doe

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4969
6. Secretly envy jane doe for fucking multiple frat boys in one night
7. Secretly resent jane doe for ruining their collective reputation
8. All of the above
Anonymous #3531
My name is Michael Tracy and I love this website.
Anonymous #3520
Wow the students at Cornell "accussed" her of being transgender prior to this whole shit-show... saying the "accussed her" is revealing, but not the point. The students are rioting and burning bras, saying Cornell failed them, but THEY are the ones who built and maintain this greek lifestyle, they tormented her that she was trans, and then they slut shamed her to the point that she cried all day! Complete lack of accountability and honesty. If there were a huge gang bang next year, they would slut shame that girl as well.
Anonymous #3495
Just for clarity, lets revisit Jane Doe's statement to the Cornell U police.... with all the extraneous verbiage cut out.
 
"I began to give oral sex to [redacted] while [redacted] had vaginal sex with me from behind. I would say that I was pretty ok with having this threesome with [redacted] and [redacted]." - First threesome at beginning of the night
 
"During the threesome, I began to feel [redacted] hit me many times on my butt. I remember that the hits were hurting me, and one hit in particular sent a sharp pain through me which caused me to turn around and say "Damn!" I remember that particular hit was jolting and forced me to pause momentarily." - Still during consensual threesome
 
"Eventually [redacted] and I would start to make out for a very short amount of time. While [redacted] and I were making out, he reached for the area near my vagina several times and each time he did, I would swat his hand away." - Swatted his hand away, and he complied
 
"When [redacted] entered the room [redacted] told me to sit on his lap. [redacted] could see now, was still not wearing any pants and he was fully erect. I sat on [redacted] lap, using my dress as a barrier between him and me. As I was sitting on [redacted] lap, [redacted] introduced himself to me and reached out to shake my hand. I felt like this was very awkward but I reached out to meet [redacted] handshake. When I made contact with [redacted] hand, he pulled me into him and we began making out. While [redacted] was kissing me [redacted] began groping [redacted] me, specifically, he began reaching for the area near my vagina again. Eventually, [redacted] and myself would end up on the bed next to the bed where [redacted] was sleeping and we began to have a threesome. I don't remember much of this threesome with [redacted] and [redacted] because much of the night after [redacted] entered the room, I was pretty incapacitated. I do remember performing oral sex on [redacted] while [redacted] had vaginal sex with me from behind. I don't specifically remember having sex with [redacted] at that point, but I do remember hearing [redacted] and [redacted] say something about "Having a turn." - The second threesome...... still consensual
 
"When he woke up, he saw that [redacted] and I were having a threesome and exclaimed "Hell yeah!" [redacted] then said he wanted to take part and asked about making it a foursome, to which I said "Hell No." I said Hell no" - The first time Jane Doe says no / sets a limit, and the frat bro complied.
 
"From what I remember, at that point, a group of multiple men walked into the room. I was instantly horrified, and I remember squealing out loud and running across the room and hiding under the covers on another bed that was in the room. I was horrified because I was really embarrassed that these individuals had seen me completely naked." - Frat bros walk in on her in a threesome, but not contact.... just her embarrassment and a hard-on or two.
 
"As I was defending myself to [redacted] and yelling at him, he apologized and grabbed my face and started kissing me. I quickly backed away to stop [redacted] from kissing me,...." - A forcible kiss, but she pulls away suggesting she is in control, and he complies and stops.
 
"I remember grabbing [redacted] arm at some point and saying to him "I don't know who any of these people are." [redacted] replied by laughing and asked if I wanted to do more Ketamine." -
"All I could remember was the feeling that I had already done Ketamine once so why not do it a second time."
"so my thought was, if I do Ketamine again maybe I will pass out. My thought was that if I passed out and these men had sex with me, then they could be charged with Rape. At that point [redacted] poured a line of Ketamine on his erect penis, implying for me to snort the line. I then snorted the line of Ketamine...." - She doesn't ask to leave, she continues doing Key, and she acknowledges that she has not yet been raped.
 
"At that point, I was back under the covers and [redacted] got under the covers with me, where he again tried reaching for the area of my vagina. I should say that during my entire time on the bed, surrounded by these men [redacted] did reach for my vagina multiple times." - So he's a scumbag....... but she doesn't tell him to get the fuck away.
 
"At that point, the group of men began flooding me with compliments about my body."
"Shortly after that, I believe it was [redacted] who asked me if they all could do drugs off of my perfect body. Seeing as I was already laying down, and feeling extremely tired, I told him "Sure," and then group of men all started pouring various things all over my body." - Once again, she doesn't tell anyone to fuck off, no one is assaulting her, and she is saying OK to requests.
 
"At some point, shortly after the men were doing drugs off of my body, [redacted] and [redacted] entered the room and said something like "Ok we're shutting down whatever the fuck this is."
"When [redacted] and [redacted] said they were shutting it down, the group of men all began to scatter." - Two frat bros show up, and again, everyone complies. Note, only one guy in that entire room could reasonably be accused of assault, and that pushing it, as she never clearly states to them to get the fuck out / off.
 
"Once we were inside the office space [redacted] and [redacted] sat on chairs and [redacted] said "Let's do more Ketamine." [redacted] and [redacted] then poured some Ketamine but I cannot remember where they poured it. I remember snorting more Ketamine..." - Once again an active participant.... no "I'm out..."
 
"[redacted] left at that point and I don't remember how it started but somehow I was having a threesome in the office space with [redacted] and [redacted] was performing oral sex on [redacted] while [redacted] had vaginal sex with me from behind." - Threesome number 3. She's wasted, but still participating
 
"The threesome continued until at some point, around 5:45am, I said that I was tired and needed to turn in. At that point, both guys stopped the threesome with me as far as I can remember. [redacted] told me that I could stay the rest of the night in his bed and he brought me to his room." - First time she clearly says stop..... and then complied
 
"At one point, a group of guys knocked on the door to [redacted] room and said they wanted to snort cocaine out of my anus, but [redacted] told them to go away and they did." - Frat bros complied
 
"Shortly after I woke up [redacted] was hovering over me with both of his arms on either side of me. I asked him what he was doing and he said he was going to put his penis in my mouth. I replied by saying no in a mean way to him, and at that point he got away from me." - Frat bro again complies
 
"When I woke up later that day at around 4 or 5pm, I was made aware that what had happened to me at Chi Phi was becoming public knowledge. It was made clear to me by several friends that the members of Chi Phi were bragging about having an "eightsome" with me. Some rumors said it was ten people, but nonetheless, it was now obvious that everyone knew it was me that this had happened to." - Then the slut shaming begins and as well as her regret.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3656
Ugh... but when you say it like that you make it seem like they're not horrible awful rapists! We need to expand the definition so that we can say rape is more common and therefore men are bad and women are victims...
 
Seriously tho you can have a bad, regrettable, even "traumatic" sexual experience and have it not be rape. Ppl who can't grasp this seem to not understand rape is a real thing that happens. If my abuser respected a no like these guys did I wouldn't be a victim. I think I remember them even giving her ways out saying "you don't have to do this if you're tired"
 
They weren't threatening her, manipulating her, she was in their age group, she could say no and she did say no and that was respected. If she truly could not consent due to the intoxication, she is way more guilty imo. She's claiming they should have known based on her slurred words? What about the guy who was straight up passing out?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3551
Wonder if someone can use AI to generate videos according to her report so people can view it and have a better understanding.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3844
Bet the NC-17 version goes viral on YouPorn

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3499
You missed a threesome.
 
Person 1, passed out during threesome one, then tried to join threesome two as foursome. Person 3(second threesome) leaves and she continues threesome with person 1 and person 2 (same people as threesome 1, but new instance, so threesome three.)
 
Then after "shut it down", is threesome four.
Anonymous #3481
Ironic to consider that many of the people embracing the narrative that she was raped,
Are in fact slut-shaming her……
 
Because they are repulsed that she may have chosen to engage in multiple threesomes in the same night.
@janedoe1 edited #3474
Attorney Thomas P. Giuffra (Lucy Craig's lolwyer) responds to Defendant's request to restrict his media blitz, arguing that he should be permitted to continue to talk about the case, but if you do not support his client then you are a "bigot" who should be censored.
 
He rants for 12 pages. He desperately wanted to name this blog, but he would then have to use the name LucyCraig.blog, 🤣.
 
Regardless, he argues that he should have maximum media prevledges with minor cutouts (addresses, personal ID information). Goose and gander.
 
We will never be silenced and Lucy's lolwyer has given us the legal roadmap.
PDF previewComment attachment by janedoe1
@janedoe1 #3470
Cornell University retains 8 attorneys, file motion to expand the potential gag order beyond "Jane Doe" (Lucy Craig) to non-parties.
Any order directed to non-parties will only affect Univeristy Investigators, associates of the parties, and individuals protscted under Title IX.
PDF preview161704_2026_Jane_Doe_v_Cornell_University_Inc_et_al_LETTER___CORRESPOND_65
Comment attachment by janedoe1
Comment attachment by janedoe1
Anonymous #3388
You know these guys are so pissed they didn’t let her come to the Halloween party, and forced the initial bone head to run one-on-one defense all night…….
“Bro, you brought this crazy into our house. It’s now your fucking responsibility to babysit the crazy all night long. No more threesomes, and for Gods sake, KEEP HER AWAY FROM THE FUCKING KETAMINE!”
Anonymous #3380
What do you make of Winston Lee / Lee Jun Hyung saying to the victim in a phone call "there was nothing that anything was happening in that room"?
 
You know, an outright lie? It's clear as day these motherfuckers ran damage control there.
 
You cannot even catch the victim outright lying, you can say she lied about x and y, but there's not definitive evidence that she did, but these guys lied through their teeth.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3463
Theirs no definitive evidence that she's a victim.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3465
Yeah Einstein, that's why the case was reopened.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous #3468
There is lots of evidence for both sides... the courts must now evaluate whether there is sufficient credible evidence one way or the other. (difference between proof and evidence, different standards of proof required for different decision types, etc.) P.S. of the 1500 pages of cornell files, I think they have leaked about 20 pages besides the preamble. So there is a SHITLOAD still to come. So don't go murdering people just yet

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3454
Please post a link to this conversation, sounds like its worth listening to

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3457
I heard it at youtube.com/watch?v=_XiYoX1ZJsY at 1:07.
 
There's probably a full raw recording somewhere out there, but I dont have it.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous #3528
Yup, he lied! This was guy number 4 - thought he would have been expelled, apparently he was suspended?
Anonymous #3360
She memes herself.
XXcwUIQV0POmJNLC.mp4
IRsSsLpev-oql0OX.mp4

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3377
Wow she is strong asf

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3361
That fucking voice matched the face. Then there are those eyes. You know what they say, never stick it in the crazy.
Was the second video her practice run before the 'event' at that orgy?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3471
Was: "Don't dip your dick in crazy"
Now: "Don't dip your dick in Lucy"

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3379
Wonder how her face be like in gang bang nigbt
Anonymous #3345
Wait! Jonno was retching and Matty was passed out.. you can imagine how pissed of she would be (busy metabolising the drugs and coming down)... what if she was bored and texted from Jonno's phone? He doesn't remember typing that... it all fits!
Anonymous #3343
This story is fizzling quickly
The MSM sees it’s full of wholes
And the public has concluded she may have been complicit/ an active participant.
 
Everyone will move on by the end of the week, unless she decides to do a 60 minutes type interview………. With a nice montage about her innocent childhood, and then her Weeping at the “horror” of the Chi night.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3387
Nah, this is the one of the few echo chamber where anyone even believes is lying.
 
Some guy yesterday made a great point about petitions, the petitions supporting her have 100s of thousands of signatories, petitions supporting the perps have almost none at all, just a couple of hundred. You saying nobody believes her is like a political candidate saying he won the race when the other guy got 99.9% of the votes.
 
But hey, if you want to believe you're making a difference here, then good, because at least you're staying away from regular social media and letting us who support victims control the narrative.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

@janedoe1 edited #3399
Petitions are not a pulse of position.
Indeed, in this situation, the people who do not support her have no time or energy or care to sign a worthless petition that is literally meaningless.
I get the feeling that the people who are against her are more upset that they had their voices silenced by the censorship thugs.
They can see the facts, we present them here and argue them and let the conversation develope, but they also do not give a flying fuck about the boys, or her, rather they care about the principle and the censorship, two vitally important reasons why this blog exists.
Since this blog is a measurement of the pulse, we have unique 250,000 daily viewers, and over 5,000,000 repeated viewership. We have attracted pro and con positions, we have attracted doxxers and internet tough guys, and snitches and bitches, and this is the only place where all sides get to argue passionately. Our statistics are more important than a petition site that regulates speech, a social media site that prohibits any discourse on the topic, or a search engine that doesnt show results.
The sheer volume of engagement is a testament to the size of the opposition given that I have done absolutely ZERO promotions or social media posts or inorganic marketing.
Just because a celebrity can get a meaningless online petition signature to thousands, doesnt mean that is the gage of the oppositional position, especially when the opposite position is being censored.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 3

Anonymous #3440
"The massive engagement that the other side is getting meas NOTHING, but the relatively small engagement that I am getting means A LOT"
 
Like nigga stfu, we can tell you're coping.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

@janedoe1 #3448
If one side is being censored so much that a random blog (this one) hosted in a foriegn nation to ensure actual freedom of expression where the US laws have failed, is the singular source of information, you cannot gage the public interest by the general spread of favorable information, speech, or content related to the censored side.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 5

Anonymous #3455
Yeah, I know, that is why this blog is somewhat popular. Because it's the only place people can go to voice their support for the men, or as many are doing, yourself included, harass a woman who might be a sexual assault victim according to a court of law. Why you're doing that instead of remaining unbiased, idk, maybe you get off on it or something.
 
But peoples necessity to come here to do that should not be mistaken as some kind of a testament to the size of the opposition to the case. Many who come here are like me, stumbled upon this site because I was curious what she looked like, and then was utterly disgusted by what I saw here. Not all of those 250k or whatever unique visitors are supportive of your cause.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 6

@janedoe1 edited #3467
That is the beauty of real speech
 
"Many who come here are like me, stumbled upon this site because I was curious what she looked like, and then was utterly disgusted by what I saw here. Not all of those 250k or whatever unique visitors are supportive of your cause."
 
You are welcome here, to engage in the free exchange of thought, the marketplace of idea, and to persuade, argue, or be mean, educational or patently vulgar. Youre an adult, you can collapse comments you do not like, you can engage the comments you decide, and most importantly, you have the same opportunity to spread your position, right or wrong, in the hopes that it will persuade another, or many others.
 
You are welcome here, even if you have opposing views as me. That is a curtesy that was deprived to me when a social media account was suspended merely for mentioning the name "Lucy Craig". Being welcome to the marketplace of thought and idea with open, albeit opposite views as many, is something thar was deprived of many many many others.
 
The readon why this simple blog is popular is because even though "our side" has been deprived of the curtesy of debate in a publiv forum, we still welcome the very people who tried to censor us...
 
That is how much we value speech, we welcome the very people who tried to silence us when we became so loud as a result of that censorship that even those who tried to silence us are now engaging us on our turf, on our platform, on our terms.
 
Had my stupid post on social media been ignored it might have reached 1,500 people tops, at most 10 engagements, no shares, and ignored through the algorithms within 10 minutes, but the silencing of my speech has now made me the loudest voice, literally, on either side, and I am making a point to the social media companies, the people who reported my post, and the general public, we will not be censored anymore, but with that, we will not censor others.
 
Try being that humble and accepting. Allowing speech from all sides, languages, countries, rank, and type (from joyful to sad, from appreciation to threats, from fluffy and off topic to vulgar and disrespectful.
 
Speech is that important.
 
And speech, no matter how crazy it is perceived, can never alone hurt anyone.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 6

Anonymous #3462
Are you being unbiased? Or getting off on trolling this forum? idk (actually, your bias is as obvious) Take some time to reflect on that and remember - this hasn't been to court yet. (fingers crossed, this will be an "aha" moment for you)

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous #3442
Oh snap! Nigga played the STFU card! Guess you will have to shut the site down now.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3351
I LOLd when I saw the BIG NEWS yesterday was Cornell banning frat parties. The media knows that normal people aren't buying the lying firecrotch Lucy Craig's story.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3393
"Normal people" buying the allegations is why this site was created in the first place. And why wouldn't people buy her story? It checks out.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous #3452
Which of her stories?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous #3456
The official one given to Cornell police in 2024.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 5

Anonymous #3458
The one where she was super excited to have a threesome because she thought they were bi like her? Where she made out with guy number 3 before having another threesome? Where she was conscious and consenting enough to reject a foursome? Where she agreed to let boys sniff drugs off her? And where she got so voluntarily intoxicated that she doesn't know how the last threesome started? the one where at 5:45 she felt tired and so they stopped? You have actually read it, right? Its the new civil case that says everything is forced.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 6

Anonymous #3464
"Where she was conscious and consenting enough to reject a foursome?"
"where she got so voluntarily intoxicated that she doesn't know how the last threesome started?"
 
Those two scenarios are mutually exclusive.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 6

Anonymous #3460
Yes, the one from 2024, the same one where she states "I can say with 100% confidence I was raped."

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 7

Anonymous #3466
The statement is posted on this site or you can check it out on the CBS projects page, go and read it... you are referring to a transcript that has not been made public, only cited in articles. Read it, or keep trolling, its up to you, but if you are that confident, you shouldnt be scared to engage with it. There are more principals of propositional logic you are missing, and principals of law, but start with the statement and we can pick up this conversation later.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 8

Anonymous #3541
read
PDF previewLucy_Craig_police_report_-_Full_-_Redacted

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3348
Only fans or netflix doccie - she will make millions one way or the other

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

P @pepeherman #3401
I do believe that she will make more money than the 7 combined in this life. Hopefully she does, she definitely deserves to win big after all of this bullshit.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3346
Is that true? I really want to believe that people have some scrap of common sense... but after Trump's second term, I just don't want to have my heart broken again.