DISCUSSION TOPIC

Lucy Craig

What do you feel should happen to women who cry rape?

PUBLIC DISCUSSION

Comments & replies

No account is required. Comment anonymously, or sign in with a pseudonymous account if you want to manage your comments later. Comments are user speech, not editorial findings.

Posting anonymously — no login required.
Optional: sign in or create a pseudonymous username to edit/delete your comments later.
Anonymous #4238
There is one portion of this sordid affair that requires more attention I believe. The ketamine and its liberal use during their debauchery. It’s schedule III in NY in small quantities, but over a gram is considered distribution and a class D felony. Reason enough to shit can several of these reprobates including the accuser. I think she was honest in her first statement to the police two years ago in that she took the drug to impress the Muslim boy she had feelings for, but had no previous experience with it. It’s a dissociative anesthetic kind of like PCP. During one of the videos of the frat house…it was noted that the frat brothers had a fentanyl ( and novel opioid) test kit. The guys were stupid but at least smart enough to test their street drugs for being doctored up. It was not their first rodeo. Does that absolve the girl of her slutty behavior? No, but at a certain point may have found herself in over her head with the special K. Without the heavy CDS use, perhaps it would not have went so far. Who was the supplier?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4319
Gingers often require higher doses of anesthetic drugs. The effects wear off faster for them as well.
Anonymous #3518
Last night was a very informative ideological gang bang!
One defender of Lucy stated that he doesn't care which of the men did what (i.e. the facts are not that important). This is equivalent to saying dude A raped her, therefore, so long as some dude is jailed, justice is served. Can't engage with a twat like that.
A second defender said that, even if the boys were found not guilty, he would believe her. A case of linking your support for someone to your identity, rather than a rational evaluation of the facts.
A third was silenced when asked about Amber Heard.
A fourth claimed to have read the statement by Lucy, but quoted a one-line sound bite from the media that relates to an unreleased transcript of the interview with the police (which is separate from the statement), indicating that the user had no knowledge of the statement.
A fifth said people who defend rape should be raped - thereby defending rape, and maybe looking for a bad date.
A sixth made a very valid point about Male 2 (Newell) being caught in a lie in a recorded phone call, and provided evidence of this which is very damning, and I'm curious to see how Cornell evaluated this in giving him a suspension. This guy was the sober monitor (had a responsibility to shut this shit down, but didn't), hit Lucy so hard she got bruising, posted the invitation, and then lied about it.
 
If you want to make a point in her defense, but you are too intimidated to read a 6 page document (with comprehension), or unable to provide clear facts, you are just wasting time. If you can, some of us will pay attention - I'm not denying that some of the guys supporting the bros are cunts and not actually interested in the facts, and they should also STFU or at least generate a meme.
 
Make a valid point, make us laugh, or fuck off.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4323
Why did anyone ask about Amber Heard?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3519
Correction, it was Lee who said there was nothing to draw attention to the room where the bang was going on....
Anonymous #3475
I hope we all agree that cases categorized as "unfounded" doesn't automatically mean the accuser lied. The accuser genuinely thinking that she or he was assaulted, but a court finds that no crime was committed, should also not be considered a lie.
 
Meaning that there would have to be a separate investigation, this would also have to be an non-intrusive one because otherwise actual victims would be disincentivized to speak up, meaning more actual rapists would get away with it. In the case of it causing victims to be more afraid to speak up, then I would much rather prefer there be no false accusation law at all. Because at the end of the day, sexual assault is a much bigger issue than false sexual assault allegations, and I'm sure the legal system agrees with this. Priorities priorities.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3829
My feeling is, when she went to give her statement, she was under the impression that there was no consent because she was intoxicated, therefore rape. But it was thrown out because she was not that intoxicated, especially to start with, so her consent was still valid, then she says she actively snorted ket (voluntary), so the boys could not have known she was not consenting (unless passed out) - this is the key reqyiement for rape. So she got a shallow definition and made the wrong call. Now, however, she is probably an expert on the law, but i dont think she cares about criminal conviction, i think she just wants the money, which is exactly how it will play out
Anonymous #3245
Brand WHORE on their forehead.
Anonymous #2977
Charge them with sexual harassment and put them on a registry.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3473
As long as there is a separate investigation to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she was lying.
Because a failed conviction is not proof or evidence that the accuser is lying.
 
But such a law has to be approached really carefully, because any legislation that might disincentivize actual victims from speaking up should never even be entertained.
 
The victim thinking that they were raped but the court finding she or he wasn't does not mean the victim lied.
The wrong person being tried but the victim genuinely though that it was the perpetrator, also not a lie.
 
Tldr: unfounded or no crime =/= malicious lie.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3082
Actually, this is exactly right! No guy will check the registry if some hot chick is throwing the cat, but will be useful in future cases and maybe job interviews
Anonymous #2976
WHO prompted this woman to open a two year old case and why was it immediately given so much credence?? She was a minion reporter
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4251
Well, that diaper on her head explains the shit for brains

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3189
Probably trying to recruit the slut to their pedo worshipping ranks.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3084
Its not right to generalise, but I haven't met a woman who looks at this case objectively...and for an ivy league chick to go full media-rapist is disgusting.
Anonymous #2940
Jail
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe1 #4248
🤣 🤣 🤣
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3190
What is the connection between her supporters and Lyndsey Clancy supporters?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3083
#IamLucyCraig

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3066
Go on ladies get a good ride 😄😁 you only live once 😉😉😉 enjoy!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #2951
Good for those girls 😉😁
Anonymous #2408
Lucys law should be enacted to protect the identies of the accused until the case formally begins. This was a drug fueled fuck fest and i am sure no criminal charges will be upheld, but the harm to these guys and even guys with similar names has been extraordinary. So i think the law has caused more harm than her or the bros
Anonymous #2322
Ask Al Sharpton.
Anonymous #2308
they should get killed ngl
Anonymous #2304
What do you think should happen to makes who doxx victims of rape?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe1 #4255
I have no idea what your intented message it. Can you elaborate in the replies, and create an anonymous comment account so that you can edit your type-os in the future?
 
"What do you think should happen to makes who doxx victims of rape?"
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4250
STFU with yer doxxing BS. If slut Lucy Craig did nothing wrong, then she's got nothing to hide.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #2456
Same thing that happens to cunts who think saying doxx is cool
Anonymous #1878
I think whoever gave the names of the 7 fuckers probably needs to be sued. If it is found that this shit was consensual then the damage to them far exceeds the damage to her. Force news outlets to report responsibly, that woukd be the best outcome of this debacle

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #2305
Dumbass, when you are served in civil court, it becomes public record. Being sued is not being doxxed

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4252
Well, Twitter made Lucy Craig's name public record, so Choo Choo to you

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #2913
Maybe it shouldn't be that way. The people on both sides of the aisle have demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt that they lack the ability to behave themselves.
Anonymous #1819
Cornell 7 should sue her, Hochul, MSM for defamation.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #2550
Why? She didn't release their names unlike the douchebag who created this site

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4253
The skank firecrotch Lucy Craig could have sued them as John Does.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous #4261
What a retarded court system that doesnt automatically enforce anonymity on both... US courts acting like they are new to this whole jistoce thing

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #2914
The guy who did works for her.
D @DarkRose #1719
It depends. She can make a police report and if she didn't lie, and was just incorrect about the classification of what happened I don't think that's malicious. I'm not saying she didn't lie, but we need to consider this.
Anonymous #1563
20 years in prison. Due to this Uber Slut, the next legitimate victim will have to wonder if people will believe them (them, because male rape is never given the time of day). I really hope a False Accuser Law - named Lucy's Law, is enacted. You lie, you go to jail.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #1662
I believe the punishment for sexual assault is possible death penalty in Dubai. 🤔

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #2458
All for chemical castration, but must be more clear cut than this shit show
Anonymous #1450
depends. rape does happens. so is false accusation. we need the evidence and check case by case
Anonymous #1344
The act of falsely accusing anyone for anything should be treated with the punishment of the crime of which they are accusing. If a woman falsely cries rape, she should be treated with jail time and being placed on the sexual offenders list.
Any false accusation should be punished as the crime would have been. Simple as.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #1615
"Lucy's Law" -- I like the sound of that. Maybe a petition should be started...

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #2552
What would "Lucy's Law" include? What would it's main purpose be?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous #3085
To protect the identities of the accused

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #1567
Agreed - I heartily believe it should be called Lucy's Law. So no one ever forgets who this miscreant is.
Anonymous #1303
Public execution. Jane Doe? more like Train Doe!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #1700
Train Hoe would have been better.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #1331
Interesting take.
Comment attachment by Anonymous
Anonymous #1236
maybe they shud actually be put in a situation where real rape occurs.. pretty sure it will scare them out of their performative and fraudulent future claims.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #2316
Ah yes the ole eye for an eye

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #1663
You definitely don’t go to Cornell.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #1335
Your uncle just got out of prison yesterday and he’s coming to rape you

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #1333
You’re so ugly that the only way you’d ever be able to have sex is by raping someone.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #1332
Define rape you ugly incel. Not even your own mother could love someone like you.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3752
Found the public fleshlight

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #1280
Only problem is Lucy Craig is a slut so she would like that.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #1246
When you say "they" who are you referring too?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #1245
Should not shud
Anonymous #99
This was all before the party
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3086
This is incredibly one-sided, meant to try Cornell in the media. If this is the extent of it though, Lucy will be rolling in cash (probably while getting spit-roasted)

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #1569
'Trauma' in the medical field simply means the area has been inflamed. Many women get UTIs from long term, committed sexual relationships. When you have a seven hour multiple member organizations- yes, that will do it.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #1489
But there is no proof (of what she said to the clinician) beyond 'trust me bro.'

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #100
Utterly vile that they did not call the police on her behalf and arrange for a rape kit.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #2252
Thats why its not believable