THE RECORD · THE ARGUMENT · THE RESPONSE

Who Is
Jane Doe
Really?

Evidence. Due process. Competing narratives. The record deserves scrutiny.

Open the evidence library Read the argument Join the discussion

WHY THIS EXISTS

Controversial cases still require evidence, process, and room for dissent.

This site is built to present opposition, documentary material, competing interpretations, and public discussion without treating allegations as adjudicated facts. Court records, attributed reporting, editorial argument, and reader comments are labeled as different kinds of material.

REPORTING CREDIT

Reporting that helped frame the public questions

The links below are credited to Richard Luthmann / NY News Press. Linking or discussing them does not convert their assertions into findings of fact.

Richard Luthmann — Cornell Seven: Evidence Before Election Theater Psy-Op ↗Richard Luthmann — BREAKING: Cornell Seven Accuser Unmasked ↗NY News Press — Cornell Seven Accuser Unmasked ↗NY News Press — Cornell Seven Evidence ↗

LATEST

Articles & analysis

Rice Purity Quiz

Take the Rice Purity Quiz As If You Were Lucy Craig

We’ve recreated the 100-question Rice Purity Test, allowing you to explore it through the lens of the publicly available records, police reports, court...

2026-11-10

Analysis

Rice Purity, Mom Lore, and Lucy Craig

One of the most revealing messages in the Cornell Seven controversy is also one of the most casually written. Understanding two pieces of Gen Z slang helps...

2026-11-08

ARTICLE

Reproduction of Key Text Messages

Read the text exchanges reproduced here.

2026-11-08

ARTICLE

The 20-Year Loophole?

Two recent court decisions, an expired ordinary filing deadline, questionable reliance on criminal statutes, and a conspicuously missing fifth cause of...

2026-11-05

Legal Commentary

Lucy Craig Wants Another 60 Days. The Court Should Say No.

Nearly two years after the alleged events, Lucile H. Craig's attorneys want to delay Diego Sarabia's motion to dismiss—while defending a complaint that...

2026-11-05

Opinion

BREAKING: Jacqueline Kelly, the Cornell Graduate Who Must Now Prove She Can Investigate Cornell

Letitia James has hired an outside lawyer to lead the Cornell 7 investigation. Her selection raises a rather inconvenient question: when does independence...

2026-11-04

PUBLIC RECORD

Documents should be inspectable, searchable, and quotable in context.

Every public Library item gets a dedicated page. PDFs are rendered responsively, OCR is searchable, video/audio transcripts are timestamped, and clicking a transcript segment jumps the media to that point.

Browse library

New docket entries · last 24 hours

Loading recent docket filings…

DISCUSSION

Topics controlled by the administrators; comments controlled by their authors.

A Place For Memes
This discussion forums is for all your Lucy Craig, Cornell 7, memes. We want to have the definitive collection of meme art about Lucy Craig.

Big Tish James
Should Big Tish James be involved in the investigation and prosecution of the Cornell 7?

Can a woman consent to sex if she is voluntarily intoxicated?
Lucy Craig engaged in voluntary consumption of alcohol and illegal substances. Is she capable of consent? And if not, are the men, who were also drinking and consuming illegal substances, according to public reporting, capable of consent? Can they claim that they were raped by Lucy Craig?

Did Lucy Craig Rape Those Drunken Boys?
Her texts say she was not drunk. The bar says she was not drunk. The boys were drunk. Did Lucy Craig (AKA "JANE DOE") rape those boys? Leave a comment with your opinion.

Discuss: Should Lucy Craig Sue Thomas Guiffra?
Thomas Guiffra's famefag attention seeking, publicity stunts have backfired. It is now known that he was leaking records related to the case (the poorly redacted afformation in support of proceeding as Jame Doe was only in possession of the person who filed it). He named a U.S. Active Service Marine, lied about a swat event, filed a fake DMCA in bad faith to this blog, named an incorrect person as a defendant, misrepresents New York's dram shop liability laws against Moonies, and named an entity that doesn't actually exists on paper. His hope was, similar to the Comb's cases, to throw shit against the wall, leak favorable documents, cancel anyone who speaks against his client, and sway the public sympathy. That backfired, with help from LucyCraog.blog. As her case becomes a comedy of errors, we ask you, should Lucile H. Craig sue Thomas Guiffra and his firm for malpractice?

Freedom of Speech
We do not care about your feelings, we do care about freedom of speech. Share and post any legal speech you want. Send us your images, videos, text messages, voice recordings or any other related material for immediate publication without censorship.

THE LATEST DISCUSSION

Latest comments

Loading latest comments…

PUBLIC DISCUSSION

Comments & replies

No account is required. Comment anonymously, or sign in with a pseudonymous account if you want to manage your comments later. Comments are user speech, not editorial findings.

Anonymous2026-10-18 10:29 UTC #4027

Lucy Craig upskirt! This is not AI, guys!

@janedoe12026-10-18 01:29 UTC #4011

Good night everyone.

SITE UPDATES:

Only the Library page was updated today, which got a citation to the location on the site. This way you can see where the media / library content has been used. Sorry, our engineer that writes the code was exhausted and had real life to handle. S/he is working on a new feature, discussed below, that will be ready by Monday.

TRANSPARENCY REPORT:

No comments have been hidden today. This week, in total, only 5 real person comments have been hidden -we have no way to ban anyone from commenting and so the 3 individuals who made those comments are still participating (we assume) in the conversation. Fake comments like the Indian spam bots that want to help with SEO and bullshit like that are automatically hidden when we see them.

REMINDER:

If you have not seen the "evidence" cites by a media outlet because they refuse to publish (such as a police report, or the Title IX investigation material...) question the source vigorously. Assume the article narrative is a lie, and do not give credit to the publication or accept their narrative and explanation of the material. Until you see it with your own eyes. Here at WIJDR we will always publish every document, media file, instantly, and anything we cite is published without any redactions added by us. Bring us your material.

BY THE NUMBERS

Your participation here is thousands of times greater than the paywall articles by mainstream media. Just looking at the comment section on many of the mainstream media pages, we are substantially more involved, more active, more engaged in the conversation, more educated on the topic, and have significantly more visitors and readers. It is a testament to the way the public feels towards mainstream media.

FUTURE UPDATE: Using the WayBack machine and archive.today, we are working on a way to mirror every mainstream media article about this case, for preservation (msm have published, deleted and republished altered material, often without notice.

We intend to mirror every article we can find, without a paywall, and provide it for free.

The idea is that every news article about "Jane Doe" (Lucy Craig) will be pumped into a dashboard here which will automatically archive the article on the archive sites, remove the paywall, and then our site will dynamically populate the content when someone searches the Press archive -like we do already with the docket. If the article changes, it will note the changes inside the original version and show all variations. We will then feed the article content into our larger database of search so that it will become a permenent part of the Lucy Craig record cite records.

An example of how MSM alters their records is attached, MSN (i believe it was) published screenshots of the Cornell Police Report. They regretted it and deleted it and published updated redactions. Notice anything interesting? LHC.

As always, we appreciate your unregulated, uncensored, unmoderated, unfiltered conversations.

Good night and keep the discussion going.

Anonymous2026-10-17 20:46 UTC #3968

Gay.

Welp folks, these are the future attorneys who will shape the definition of due process in America.

Good luck.

xTfl4KtGXf1V_M--.mp4

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-18 19:18 UTC #4045

Nuh lawyers are never trained to honestly judge the situation… their job is to make biased arguments

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-19 08:22 UTC #4073

Depends on where they passed the Bar exam. For example China!

She didn't even last 5 days!

Lifted this comment from elsewhere but it will make you vomit a little. Stormy Daniels looks a lot like his mom

in passing. Natalie Harp (whatever her name is) looks like Ivanka. Katie Zacharia is supposed to look a lot

like his grand daughter. Feel free to search images and see for yourself.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-19 09:31 UTC #4074

I can believe it! He said he would fuck Ivanka already. If he could, he'd clone himself and make a train. I'd rather see Lucy Craig win 5 million dollars than see Trump survive the midterms.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-18 04:20 UTC #4024

“Show what real justice looks like….”

As they mimic beating death the 7 accused frat boys.

Lol.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-18 20:40 UTC #4053

Jesus, at an ivy league school? I thought that one chick was going to turn on of those effigies in to a dildo and rape it. She would that splinters for lucy

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-18 06:23 UTC #4026

If you want to support her, you should bring a pillow and dry hump it

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-18 00:00 UTC #4005

I love how they always look and act exactly how you expect them to.

@janedoe12026-10-17 19:48 UTC #3938

All these so called "mainstream media" outlets, Washington Post, New York Times, The New Yorker, ... all exploding with deeply important, holier than thou, exclusive new details, famous talking heads, headlines, then putting every "Jane Doe" article behind a paywall and not sharing any documents, evidence, content, material, or names so that the reader must first pay and then accept (what they paid for) their version and interpretation of the material, really pisses me off.

"The New York Times has reviewed a police report given to the Cornell Police"... "Washington Post has reviewed the Title IX investigation documents...." yet not one of these fucking sources provides the documents for the public to make up their own minds and inturpretation of the documents. These outlets create 2 or 3 versions of the same article, test them each for social media paid advertisement, tease an hour or two of non-paywall, then when they have the statistics for which is performing best, they put the article behind a paywall and pay to promote the best performing version.

This is why we designed WIJDR to be fully transparent, preserve and make available every document, meme, audio, video, content we can find or scrape or that is added via the comments. We are not going to gatekeep information while 1) demanding that you take our word for it, and 2) charge you to even read the text of an article or topic...

The mainstream media are a bunch of bitches.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-18 13:11 UTC #4030

WaPo just butthurt that they can't gatekeep information no more, it kills their ability to frame the narrative...

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 20:54 UTC #3974

They will publish what makes them the most profit.

@janedoe12026-10-17 19:26 UTC #3921

I will point out only one thing about how stupid these protesters are.

There is absolutely no chance that before this would Lucy Craig have shown up to any protests.

"I know that if there was a protest for me, Jane Doe would show up." No, she would not. She doesn't care about you in the least. She did not show up for any protests in her life. Her only concern was and is for her own self, reputation, and clout.

The rest of this clip is just "blah, blah, blah" to me. I just point out this one segment near the end.

Jane_Doe_Protest.mp4

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 21:40 UTC #3978

Nose ring theory.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 19:35 UTC #3927

Someone should print this and ask every single protestor to read it. I’m concerned that almost none of them read.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-17 19:36 UTC #3928

her police report

Anonymous2026-10-17 19:23 UTC #3919

Let's say she did consent to a few of those men. Did she ever consent to them posting "free pussy" in the group chat?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-18 00:01 UTC #4006

Do you agree with her testimony, that she still said no and they listened? She said yes to other stuff.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 20:08 UTC #3947

1st Amendment.

While disgusting, it’s still protected.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 19:59 UTC #3942

Does a post make it rape?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 19:32 UTC #3922

If you agree that she is enjoying the gang bang, then there is nothing wrong with telling friends about the free pussy.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-17 19:41 UTC #3933

That's not how consent works.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-18 03:54 UTC #4017

Telling people there is free pussy, and the slutshaming are separate, they did not influence her thinking when she said yes. Otherwise you could say it was not consensual because one of the boys was circumcised and she assumed he would not be

Anonymous2026-10-17 17:14 UTC #3875

Hi, I just want to say I personally know "Jane Doe". I was in a few classes with her and I can confirm her name is NOT Lucy Craig. Lucy is just another student at the school and is not affiliated with this case. Spreading misinformation about a person is extremely harmful, especially when everything is alleged. You don't have to agree with this message, but I just want to make you guys aware that this is not the person you are looking for.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-18 04:13 UTC #4022

The jedi mind trick?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-18 13:17 UTC #4033

"Lucy Craig is not the slut you're looking for..."

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 22:01 UTC #3987

Oh? So who is the "real" jane doe?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 21:45 UTC #3979

The NYT confirmed it today, lying skank

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-17 22:52 UTC #3994

"I AINT NO SKANK!!"

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe12026-10-17 19:36 UTC #3930

Let me guess, a fem-nazi trying to divert attention? If I were to guess you are probably a student at a university somewhere, but not Cornell. Maybe somewhere like Virginia Polytechnic Institute or some other non-Ivy League university or academic learning center. You probably never attended any classes with "Jane Doe" or for that matter any classes at Cornell University.

Given that you are using this site, I would say that you are a first- or second-year student -because the courses are easier and it is a Saturday so you have no studying to do. Maybe your school had a few student protests, or you saw online somewhere that you can try to manipulate and sow doubt with comments like this since the whole "I am Jane Doe" nonsense did not work.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 18:02 UTC #3894

Is that so? Then why did Lucy Craig's parents home in Birmingham, AL get swatted and the attorney confirmed it was "Jane Doe".

Check the police scanner for the date and time of the swatting in Birmingham.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-17 18:09 UTC #3897

The person in the pictures are not her.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-17 18:35 UTC #3901

This is not true either. The images are taken from her still available IG account, which places her at her parents home in Birmingham, and at Cornell.

What a coincidence that her name happens to be Lucile H. Craig, from Birmingham, AL, attending Cornell University until something "dramatic" happened that she no longer posts about Cornell after only a short period of time attending the school -and bragging about it signficantly. And what a coincidence that her family home in Birmingham is connected to her father's medical services company which also connects to her, was swatted, as confirmed by her own attorney, the same time and date.

If there are two Lucile H. Craigs with identical life stories as told through her Instagram account, identical home town, selective enrollment university, and absence therefrom, and post attendance, post lawsuit police incidents all connecting, then we really live in the matrix.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 17:28 UTC #3880

I hope you guys grow and mature one day, and improve your emotional intelligence, because from what I've seen, you guys are speaking very immaturely about a serious topic. We don't have to agree, but please speak with logic and maturity. You won't be achieving anything with these immature words and actions.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-17 23:06 UTC #4000

Power of forum anonymity.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-17 17:33 UTC #3881

Where is the logic? I’ve never seen a good argument why this is not consensual AND Lucy is not an offender.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-17 17:40 UTC #3882

that's not up for you to decide, isn't it? you're not the victim. But if you want to argue against it, then by all means.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous2026-10-17 21:47 UTC #3981

Tell that to the cunts who doxxed the accused. Lying whore Lucy Craig is fair game.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 5

Anonymous2026-10-17 22:57 UTC #3997

They're all whores.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

@janedoe12026-10-17 20:02 UTC #3943

"that's not up for you to decide"

Actually it is. It was placed on us, as a society, to judge Lucy by her own attorneys' actions. Her attorneys wanted wanted us to judge her as a victim, to take their word for it, and to protest and demand that the "culture" at Cornell be given an enigma that is only favorable to his consignment fee.

However, if we take the position that is fundamentally wrong, that we must judge, having been invited to do exactly that by her attorneys' 5,000 million media appearances, then all of sudden we are not supposed to "judge". The attorneys want the population to be sheep and just accept their version without any questioning. We are okay to judge her favorably as a victim, but we are not okay to mention her name if we do not accept her narrative.

Sorry, but I will indeed judge her as a whore, based on the same evidence that she wants us to disregard and just take her lolwyer's word that she is a "victim".

The first amendment would be useless if we did not judge her, either favorably or disfavorably to her position, because we have been invited by her representation to do exactly that, and when we did, and when we saw the discrepancies and omissions and implausiblility of her narrative all of a sudden we have become "begots" in the eyes of her attorney.

An attorney who has just labelled half the country as "bigots" merely because they do not buy his famefag narrative cannot be trusted with anything else because he has shown that he cannot be trusted with the vital and most meaningful aspects of stewardship of the first amendment. He has shown that he only cares about the first amendment if it is favorable to his client and his media narrative and his case, but if you challenge that, well you are automatically a bigot.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous2026-10-17 17:59 UTC #3892

Why don’t you tell this to those protesters and misandrists? They are much bigger no?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 5

Anonymous2026-10-17 18:01 UTC #3893

I never said it only applied to specific groups.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 17:20 UTC #3877

Hi Lucy

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 17:16 UTC #3876

^ just to clarify. their names are very similar so please don't harass the wrong person here.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-19 11:27 UTC #4082

What's your name? If you want, 7 or 9 of us could come by and interview you?

@janedoe12026-10-17 16:59 UTC #3872

NEW FEATURE ON OUR BLOG:

Every content / media item in our library now sources to the locations where it appears on our blog for easy verification, purpose, and explanation of it's use. If it is used in multiple locations on this blog, it will cite to every location: comment, article, docket, replies, discussion, etc. with a link to the source.

This addition was a suggestion by one of our commenters who had difficulty understanding a purpose of a meme / photo that was in the library originated and wanted to know it's source from within our blog.

We read every suggestion and try to code it into our blog.

Anonymous2026-10-17 16:59 UTC #3871

17 Life Lessons I Learned By Participating In Orgies

No 15. Be discreet, and never name names when you talk about what happened.

Now the boys learned the lesson in a hard way. Should have read this article first.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/lucasfauno/orgy-life-lessons

Anonymous2026-10-17 13:46 UTC #3853

If Lucy Craig ran the train, then why are the guys getting railroaded? 🤔

@janedoe12026-10-17 12:00 UTC #3847

Commentary.

signal-2026-10-17-06-49-46-880.mp4

signal-2026-10-17-06-49-46-880-1.mp4

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 17:44 UTC #3885

you think it's okay for you to create explicit pictures of her without her consent?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-17 21:49 UTC #3982

If that firecrotch snatch Lucy Craig doesn't like it, she shouldn't have made herself a public figure by falsely crying rape.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-17 17:46 UTC #3887

Yes. The First Amendment trumps her public image "consent".

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-17 22:54 UTC #3995

I dont know is ' free pussy ' also under her consent or could it fall into soiciting?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous2026-10-18 04:16 UTC #4023

Marketing

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous2026-10-17 23:15 UTC #4003

What’s wrong with telling friends about a ongoing orgy?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 5

Anonymous2026-10-18 04:27 UTC #4025

She needed to set boundaries... This is why orgies should not be entered in to lightly. This triggered the whole hunt for "rats" in the room

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-17 17:55 UTC #3891

https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB11314

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-17 17:54 UTC #3890

it does not apply to edited images to create "revenge porn".

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous2026-10-18 02:27 UTC #4013

Does Thu mean there are Lucy Craig nudes out there? LoL

Anonymous2026-10-17 06:54 UTC #3830

The courts dont want to issue gag ordera on the attorneys! I thought trial by media was universally condemned by courts! They are actually the problem, they released half the names (well 7/8), resulting in the massive persecution of the 7 when some, like scott k just walked in, saw Lucy chatting, and left. The fucking courts caused this shit show and wont take responsibility! #LucysLaw to ensure anonymity for both sides

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 10:41 UTC #3834

Good luck making #LucysLaw stick in the age of the internet

Anonymous2026-10-17 05:51 UTC #3825

you are disgusting people and I hope you get sued out the ass. since you're so worried about those rapists you should keep them warm in prison kissass

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe12026-10-17 13:59 UTC edited #3855

We also hope that we get sued. Anti-SLAPP would be filed within seconds demanding massive sanctions against Plaintiff for violating our first amendment right to be critical and examine and argue the matter placed before the court of public opinion by Lucy Craig through her famefag lolwyer himself. Sanctions against a frivilous lolsuit would be in the hundreds of thousands or more.

Don't take our word for it, ask this same judge who dismissed a lawsuit by Sean Combs against NBC for defamation and awarded NBC almost 500,000$ in anti-SLAPP sanctions. https://lucycraig.blog/article/judge-phaedra-f-perry-bond

Ironically, Combs' lawyers in that matter, in front of the same judge, was Sher Tremonte LLP, same attorney for Scott Norris (defendant in this case). https://lucycraig.blog/article/scott-norris-retains-sher-tremonte-llp-as-questions-grow-over-the-evidence-behind-his-incl

We have an attorney, we are well versed in First Amendment law, we are not worried and would celebrate if Lucy Craig's retarded famefag lolwyer made moves to sue us, identify us, shut us down...

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-17 15:13 UTC #3856

Not to mention the more publicity for this site if anyone tried to sue us.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 10:43 UTC #3835

Cry harder cunt

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-17 22:55 UTC #3996

Very cunty of you.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 06:05 UTC #3828

Did you just say we are disgusting for so much as questioning a complicated case, then imply we should get SA'ed in prison? Do you even give a shit about man who claims Lucy abused him that day?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-17 17:45 UTC #3886

No, men created the system and this is their consequence.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-18 00:04 UTC #4007

Those men are young adults they didn't create shit. This is like saying all women should apologize for abortion.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-17 09:22 UTC #3831

Misandrists

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-18 00:05 UTC #4008

Actual femcel uglies

Anonymous2026-10-17 03:01 UTC #3793

NYT shouldn’t you report those obvious misandrists and their motivation to support a false accuser?

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/16/nyregion/cornell-jane-doe-internet-doxing.html

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 11:13 UTC #3843

If anyone wants to read that garbage, don't pay for a NYT subscription, use this

https://archive.is/20261016230231/https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/16/nyregion/cornell-jane-doe-internet-doxing.html

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-17 11:23 UTC #3845

FTA: "The analysis showed that the posts had begun on X and spread to Bluesky, 4chan, Discord, Telegram, Rumble and other platforms, their numbers growing by the hour."

LOL that Bluesky helped the cause.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

@janedoe12026-10-17 11:59 UTC edited #3846

They left us out because they would have to publish the name Lucy Craig.

Also, these sudden flood of articles from all the publications talking about "doxxing" (coincidental that they all came in one day) is to put pressure on platforms to delete the content they don't like -but because they cannot control or delete or moderate anything here on LucyCraig.blog it is pointless to include us in their reporting.

The same goes for legal filings. The lolwyer for Lucy Craig hates us, but he can't cry like a bitch or even mention us without mentioning Lucy Craig, so he has to suck it up.

We will not be censored, we will not be moderated, and we have created a platform that, by it's very name, cannot be challenged without naming Lucy Craig at the same time.

#Winning!!!!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 10:47 UTC #3836

NYT is just butthurt that they can't gatekeep information no more -- it kills their ability to frame their bullshit narrative.

@janedoe12026-10-17 01:50 UTC #3776

Hilarious, the hunger games alliances are being formed at Cornell.

The sciences v. the humanities faculties.

f-BhOucBuv2x8ymF.mp4

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 02:14 UTC #3778

Humanities? Where 80% students get A and the other 20% almost never come to the class? They are a joke.

Anonymous2026-10-17 00:30 UTC #3769

Here is Judge Phaedra F. Perry-Bond attending the "Annual Chelsea Reform Democratic Club BBQ" in 2023.

She is the one that is sealing records and being provocative against Defendants already.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 11:00 UTC #3841

Should do a deep dive on this obvious affirmative-action hire.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 01:09 UTC #3775

Do you think she read this website? Can we change her mind?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe12026-10-17 00:48 UTC #3772

Source: https://chelseacommunitynews.com/2023/08/23/unity-and-community-engagement-at-annual-chelsea-reform-democratic-club-bbq/

Anonymous2026-10-17 00:21 UTC #3768

You can just tell the femcel feminists who don't get male attention from the high quality guys they actually want are SEETHING they can only hate men for this case, not "straight white" men.

Notice they accuse you of hating women when they openly hate men. Notice they call you an incel when they clearly don't have the male attention they're looking for. Notice they call you fat ugly and unfuckable when they act like feminists, feminists are literally known for being fat and ugly, and as mentioned before they are not getting positive male attention from the high quality men they shoot for, otherwise they wouldn't hate men.

They accuse you of hating women, but they ignore when the men in Jane's own story did take no for an answer, or when she gave explicit consent to them, yes this applies to the men who joined later. That or they say she couldn't have consented bc she was intoxicated, ignoring the fact she admitted to having sex with 2 guys who were far more intoxicated than her, passing out and heaving, before the other guys even got there. They do hate men, that's why they accuse you of hating women.

They wanna push the agenda women are victims and men are perpetrators because they are cry bullies and want power. Playing the victim card gives them the attention and leverage they want to guilt you and look like a good person who cares, but it's performative because they don't give a shit about Matthew Ingalls.

Take it from a woman who's been victimized her whole life, you ladies are the problem. It's not all men, it's not most men, it's not just men, it's you. If a man can be beaten by a mob of black people and watch his family be killed or robbed by black people and not hate or discriminate against all black people, you don't have to be a bitter nag who hates men.

To the men, if you have never been called sexist, racist, homophobic, you're probably a sanitized simp who these ladies would walk all over and cheat on for a Chad anyway. Take their insults as compliments~ ❤️

Anonymous2026-10-16 21:28 UTC #3756

🤣

Lucy_Craig_meme_video.mp4

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 01:07 UTC #3773

8=======D

@janedoe12026-10-16 20:32 UTC edited #3754

SITE: UPDATES / TRANSPARENCY REPORT

Updates:

We have created a method to monitor all related cases... Including the lawsuit in Albany, New York brought by Lucy Craig's victim Mr. Lopes to stop the appointment of Big Tish James as Special Prosecutor. The cases are cataloged at the same location "View docket" from the menu. Any future change of venues, countersuits, alternative or parallel suits / criminal matters, can now be added within seconds. The record will always remain. Once it is on the docket, no future sealing orders will erase it from Lucy Servers.

You can now run a train on comments and article reactions. Click the train reaction and see for yourself. The more reactions the longer the train is being ran.

TRANSPARENCY REPORT:

Three comments have been hidden today. They appear to be the same person, inferred from back-to-back-to-back nature and context/content. We are unsure if we made the correct decision, so we are sharing the comments screenshot here for the community to let us know if we made the correct decision or not. We will review the decision after hearing all sides.

We have reach 6,000,000 page views, and are consistently between 175,000-250,000 unique daily visitors.

SUCCESS:

The docket mirror system (now expanded to multiple dockets) works perfectly, and preserves all records immediately when they are made public. Today we saw the judge order the sealing of a document that was filed later in the day yesterday. Not even 24 hours later. Our systems preserved the filings, the status changes, the metadata, and record. The official docket no longer has the document available, but the Lucy Server Docket has it preserved for ever. This system has been expanded so that we can easily add new dockets as we learn about them -like the Big Tish James docket which we already added.

COMING SOON: Cite your sources. Now that we have every document, video, meme, recording, and content, we are adding an academic style "Cite your sources" button to every page. You will be able to search for the keywords inside any content metadata (transcripts, OCR, PDF extracts, articles, images, videos, audios, etc) and accurately cite to the direct primary source. If you don't see it already, it is coming any moment, just finishing the final touches.

As always, let us know what new features, ideas, concepts, or functions you would like to see and we will do our best to build and code them into our platform.

KEEP THE CONVERSATIONS HAPPENING. Happy Friday.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-16 21:48 UTC #3759

Regarding the issue of follow uo notificationa qhen qe are all anonymous, maybe have a comment seaech to get there fast? (you have more rooms rhan chi phi in here)

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

@janedoe12026-10-16 22:51 UTC edited #3761

There is now a global search button on every page that will let you search for anything, articles, transcripts, OCR, comments, file names, docket entries, videos, audios, images, PDFs, everything.

Then just click the "insert citation" https://lucycraig.blog/?comments_page=1#comment-3759 while drafting a comment, and it will insert for you.

We also included features for comment text styles (bold, italics, underline). If you want to examine the source material (in this example the comment) you simply open it in the search bubble, never having to leave your comment again.

*Still working on a concept for anonymous comment replies / reaction notifications. I am sure there is a solution but the problem is gangbanging my brain right now.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-17 16:25 UTC #3865

Is 7 the max limit on the thread train?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous2026-10-17 16:27 UTC #3867

No, unlimited train rides. After 7 the indentation stays the same at the same as 7 due spacing.

@janedoe12026-10-16 17:19 UTC edited #3743

The court has just issued order number 70 SEALING document 68. As expected, the document is no longer available on the official court docket site, but now has a forever home on our Lucy Server.

The automatic updates, transfers, and status change, without modifying existing records on our servers, worked perfectly. 68 remains available on LucyCraig.blog regardless of the sealed designation on the court docket.

You can check out the preserved docket, and documents, on our "View docket" page clickable from the menu: https://lucycraig.blog/docket