Lucy Craig is Jane Doe - 100% Verified logo Lucy Craig is Jane Doe - 100% Verified
THE RECORD · THE ARGUMENT · THE RESPONSE

Who Is
Jane Doe
Really?

Evidence. Due process. Competing narratives. The record deserves scrutiny.

Open the evidence libraryRead the argumentJoin the discussion
✍ Sign the petition
WHY THIS EXISTS

Controversial cases still require evidence, process, and room for dissent.

This site is built to present opposition, documentary material, competing interpretations, and public discussion without treating allegations as adjudicated facts. Court records, attributed reporting, editorial argument, and reader comments are labeled as different kinds of material.

REPORTING CREDIT

Reporting that helped frame the public questions

The links below are credited to Richard Luthmann / NY News Press. Linking or discussing them does not convert their assertions into findings of fact.

Richard Luthmann — Cornell Seven: Evidence Before Election Theater Psy-Op ↗Richard Luthmann — BREAKING: Cornell Seven Accuser Unmasked ↗NY News Press — Cornell Seven Accuser Unmasked ↗NY News Press — Cornell Seven Evidence ↗
LATEST

Articles & analysis

Rice Purity Quiz

Take the Rice Purity Quiz As If You Were Lucy Craig

We’ve recreated the 100-question Rice Purity Test, allowing you to explore it through the lens of the publicly available records, police reports, court...

2026-11-10Analysis

Rice Purity, Mom Lore, and Lucy Craig

One of the most revealing messages in the Cornell Seven controversy is also one of the most casually written. Understanding two pieces of Gen Z slang helps...

2026-11-08ARTICLE

Reproduction of Key Text Messages

Read the text exchanges reproduced here.

2026-11-08ARTICLE

The 20-Year Loophole?

Two recent court decisions, an expired ordinary filing deadline, questionable reliance on criminal statutes, and a conspicuously missing fifth cause of...

2026-11-05Legal Commentary

Lucy Craig Wants Another 60 Days. The Court Should Say No.

Nearly two years after the alleged events, Lucile H. Craig's attorneys want to delay Diego Sarabia's motion to dismiss—while defending a complaint that...

2026-11-05Opinion

BREAKING: Jacqueline Kelly, the Cornell Graduate Who Must Now Prove She Can Investigate Cornell

Letitia James has hired an outside lawyer to lead the Cornell 7 investigation. Her selection raises a rather inconvenient question: when does independence...

2026-11-04
PUBLIC RECORD

Documents should be inspectable, searchable, and quotable in context.

Every public Library item gets a dedicated page. PDFs are rendered responsively, OCR is searchable, video/audio transcripts are timestamped, and clicking a transcript segment jumps the media to that point.

Browse library

New docket entries · last 24 hours

Loading recent docket filings…

DISCUSSION

Topics controlled by the administrators; comments controlled by their authors.

A Place For Memes
This discussion forums is for all your Lucy Craig, Cornell 7, memes. We want to have the definitive collection of meme art about Lucy Craig.

Big Tish James
Should Big Tish James be involved in the investigation and prosecution of the Cornell 7?

Can a woman consent to sex if she is voluntarily intoxicated?
Lucy Craig engaged in voluntary consumption of alcohol and illegal substances. Is she capable of consent? And if not, are the men, who were also drinking and consuming illegal substances, according to public reporting, capable of consent? Can they claim that they were raped by Lucy Craig?

Did Lucy Craig Rape Those Drunken Boys?
Her texts say she was not drunk. The bar says she was not drunk. The boys were drunk. Did Lucy Craig (AKA "JANE DOE") rape those boys? Leave a comment with your opinion.

Discuss: Should Lucy Craig Sue Thomas Guiffra?
Thomas Guiffra's famefag attention seeking, publicity stunts have backfired. It is now known that he was leaking records related to the case (the poorly redacted afformation in support of proceeding as Jame Doe was only in possession of the person who filed it). He named a U.S. Active Service Marine, lied about a swat event, filed a fake DMCA in bad faith to this blog, named an incorrect person as a defendant, misrepresents New York's dram shop liability laws against Moonies, and named an entity that doesn't actually exists on paper. His hope was, similar to the Comb's cases, to throw shit against the wall, leak favorable documents, cancel anyone who speaks against his client, and sway the public sympathy. That backfired, with help from LucyCraog.blog. As her case becomes a comedy of errors, we ask you, should Lucile H. Craig sue Thomas Guiffra and his firm for malpractice?

Freedom of Speech
We do not care about your feelings, we do care about freedom of speech. Share and post any legal speech you want. Send us your images, videos, text messages, voice recordings or any other related material for immediate publication without censorship.

THE LATEST DISCUSSION

Latest comments

Loading latest comments…

PUBLIC DISCUSSION

Comments & replies

No account is required. Comment anonymously, or sign in with a pseudonymous account if you want to manage your comments later. Comments are user speech, not editorial findings.

Posting anonymously — no login required.
Optional: sign in or create a pseudonymous username to edit/delete your comments later.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4204
Looks like Lucy Craig had to scrape the bottom of the barrel to find lawyers to front the skank's cash grab
Anonymous #4154
@everyone
please help this website & contribute to transparency by posting these below documents (if you've downloaded them!) or their links (if you have them!) which have been missing from this site due to court orders :(
 
MATTER OF DOE v CORNELL UNIVERSITY (Appeal) (Tompkins County):-
  • #5 2026-09-29 COPY OF SEALING ORDER - Sealed
  • #4 2026-09-29 PROOF OF SERVICE OF NOTIFICATION OF CASE NUMBER Sealed
  • #3 2026-09-28 COPY OF SEALING ORDER - Sealed
  • #2 2026-09-28 COPY OF ORDER/JUDGMENT APPEALED FROM - Sealed
  • #1 2026-09-28 COPY OF NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH PROOF OF FILING / INFORMATIONAL STATEMENT Sealed
 
 
John Doe v. Cornell University (Tompkins County - Ithaca) Article 78 Challenge to Title IX report:
  • #36 2026-08-07 MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN REPLY (Motion #1) Un-Redacted per 22 NYCRR §202.5(e)
  • #34 2026-07-17 MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION (Motion #1) Sealed
  • #33 2026-07-17 EXHIBIT(S) - 4 (Motion #1) Sealed
  • #32 2026-07-17 EXHIBIT(S) - 3 (Motion #1) Sealed
  • #29 2026-07-17 AFFIRMATION (Motion #1) Sealed
  • #27 2026-07-15 NOTICE OF HARD COPY EXHIBIT FILING Sealed
  • #26 2026-07-15 NOTICE OF HARD COPY EXHIBIT FILING Sealed
  • #25 2026-07-15 APPENDIX Sealed
  • #24 2026-07-15 APPENDIX Corrected Sealed
  • #23 2026-07-15 APPENDIX Sealed
  • #22 2026-07-15 APPENDIX Sealed
  • #21 2026-07-15 APPENDIX Sealed
  • #20 2026-07-15 APPENDIX Sealed
  • #19 2026-07-15 APPENDIX Sealed
  • #18 2026-07-15 APPENDIX Sealed
  • #17 2026-07-15 APPENDIX Sealed
  • #16 2026-07-15 AFFIDAVIT Sealed
  • #8 2026-03-30 EXHIBIT(S) - 5 Sealed Redacted per 22 NYCRR §202.5(e)
  • #7 2026-03-30 EXHIBIT(S) - 4 Sealed Redacted per 22 NYCRR §202.5(e)
  • #6 2026-03-30 EXHIBIT(S) - 3 Sealed Redacted per 22 NYCRR §202.5(e)
 
 
Jane Doe v. Cornell University et al (New York City):
#22 2026-09-30 RJI (AMENDED) Sealed
#7 2026-09-16 ADDENDUM - GENERAL (840A) Sealed
#6 2026-09-16 RJI -RE: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Sealed
#1 2026-09-16 SUMMONS + COMPLAINT Sealed

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe1 edited #4181
For the Jane Doe NYC case, we have the original, uncensored Summons and Complaint in the Library. We are working on a way to connect documents to the docket where applicable, in these instances where the material were censored, sealed or otherwise removed before we started mirroring the docket (if we find the original documents). Now that we have the mirroring system, any sealed document after it was originally filed will still remain on Lucy Craig servers and in the Library.
 
Fun fact, the court in NYC sealed the original Summons and Complaint, ordered it to be refiled and redacted, but it was also an Exhibit 1 in the Albany case against Big Tish James being appointed as Special Prosecutor and in that case it is not sealed, redacted, or removed. We have it from both sources.
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.
PDF preview161704_2026_Jane_Doe_v_Cornell_University_Inc_et_al_SUMMONS___COMPLAINT_1
PDF previewEXHIBIT(S) - 1. Civil Summons and Complaint

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 2

@janedoe1 #4182
There is a source for the files, https://trellis.law/search has them all, including the now sealed documents. However, Trellis wants 140$ a month subscription. If we cannot find the originally filed documents elsewhere for free, we will eventually cave and make the purchase... but we want to exhaust other avenues of locating the files first.... This blog doesn't generate any income for us, so it will be an out-of-pocket expense. If by the end of the week we cannot find the final documents to complete the record, we will cave and eat the expense.
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

@janedoe1 #4273
This is great!!! Thank you. We are just finishing up the code so we can attach library pdf's to the docket where applicable for exactly this. The dockets will continue to pull the records, live, but for the ones that existed prior to our system as "sealed" that we obtain, we can manually add.
Thank you so much!
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 5

Anonymous #4279
No problem, happy to help. I don't know if you have had a chance to look at the documents yet but a number of the redactions, particularly in #6, were just comment overlays and could therefore easily be deleted, revealing the text underneath.
PDF previewComment attachment by Anonymous
PDF previewComment attachment by Anonymous
PDF previewComment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 6

@janedoe1 edited #4280
I will take a look now. The OCR should be trying to unredact.
 
We have now added each to their respective positions within the dockets. I am going to check the redactions and if they can be removed to reveal underneath, will update here.
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 7

Anonymous #4282
The second set of pdfs I attached should have all the redactions removed where it was possible to reveal something underneath.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 7

Anonymous #4281
I also came across a set of the first 7 documents from the 161704/2026 case with one interesting difference in #4...
PDF previewComment attachment by Anonymous
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 8

@janedoe1 #4284
 
HUGE!!! We are vigorously checking these out. Thank you so much.
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 3

Anonymous #4198
Can we get a sad face emoji on left side of smile face in reactions?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous #4199
Also whats the difference b/w star and trophy?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4172
For the summons, I think its this: https://www.cbsnews.com/projects/2026/cornell-rape-allegations-documents/docs/004_Cornell_complaint_names_redacted.pdf

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4155
#1 2026-09-16 SUMMONS + COMPLAINT Sealed -> https://lucycraig.blog/media/7/raw
@janedoe1 #4150
Tri Delta statement:
 
Original source: https://www.tridelta.org/the-trident/tri-deltas-message-regarding-cornell/
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.
Tri Delta statement:

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #4184
"alumni member"
 
No,she dropped out, she is now seeking a career in getting rich from frivilous lolsuits, gym themed OF content and public sympathy. Her family is already rich so she can handle life without an education.
 
By the way, who the fuck goes to an ivy league school for a degree in Hotel Administration anyways? Spend $50,000 a semester for a career as a bell hop or check-in desk jockey. Sounds about right.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4186
That was her dad trying to get her degreed so she coukd marry well.... He should sue cornell!

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #4158
They have also passed judgement! Maybe Universities in the US are overrated? Our shitty ones don't have their own police, but they at least would have said "alleged assault". Anyway, Lucy is suing them too.
Anonymous #4149
Lucy Craig's public reading.
 
The G Spot!
Comment attachment by Anonymous
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4176
Hypersexuality

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4177
I’m not a psychologist, and we don’t have a lot of case history, but check this shit out:
 
Histrionic Personality Disorder (HPD)
Core Features of HPD-What Clinicians Look For
 
1. Constant Need for Attention
2. Excessive Emotionality
3. Dramatic, Theatrical, or Exaggerated Expression
Behavioral Symptoms — How HPD Comes Across in Behavior
 
1. Inappropriate Seductive or Flirtatious Behaviour
2. Suggestibility/Easily Influenced by Others
3. Over-Emphasis on Physical Beauty
4. Impulsivity in Emotional or Social Decisions
 
Emotional and Relationship Symptoms
1. Strong, but Brief Emotions
2. Difficulty with Deeper Relationships
3. Hypersensitivity to Criticism or Rejection
4. Need for Approval and Reassurance
 
Source:
Signs and Symptoms of Histrionic Personality Disorder (HPD)
https://www.healthspectra.com/signs-and-symptoms-of-histrionic-personality-disorder-hpd/

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous #4234
Not being a psychologist doesn't stop the hoes from trying to alibi Lucy's contradictions with psychobabble like "fawning" 😂

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous #4233
"I’m not a psychologist", yes, neither am I, but these behaviors are exclusive to HPD or cluster B personality disorders.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4159
Wow, can't think about anything other than gym and fucking - complete airhead and narcissist. I just feel sorry for this dude she is dating - he is going to be (slut-shame)-shamed in to staying with her.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4222
Cause Zuckerberg is not good at what he does, one idea that looked a lot like other haooened to explode, and since then he just dicks around with VR and firing staff. Musk is a cunt, but a monster of technology
@janedoe1 #4144
Zuckerberg is a anti-speech piece of shit.
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #4146
True, though Facebook is doing a lulzily shitty job at censoring Lucy's name IRT: Not a single one of my "LucyCra!g" posts have been yanked. And they haven't pulled any of my gifs in a week. Not that I'm complaining lol

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4153
Well done for posting her name though!
Anonymous #4134
4chan's hot some interesting takes:
"The entire Google, Meta, Reddit and Hollywood is in coordinated panic and they're censoring Lucy Craig.
 
They're terrified every man is finally waking up to the truth about femaLes. All their trillions of dollars in propaganda is in ruins. Bunch of 4chan and X patriots are defeating LiLith kek."

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4152
They're censoring coz of court's orders not that they like the girl or pity her. Ask accountability & transparency from the court not social media giants

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4157
Agreed, the courts are at fault. A search engine must search the internet objectively; it should only filter if I put a content filter. If Facebook and shit like that filters its searches, that's fine because they have a responsibility to their members, and can decide how to discharge that responsibility. The courts should have prevented a trial by media by keeping anonymity, and restraining formal media outlets, and then when that is breached by you detectives out there, they can throw up their hands and say they did their best, and if the mainstream media can't report, everything else will still look like speculation and naturally be lower in the search results
Anonymous #4130
Its meme time. Share any and all memes about Train Doe.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe1 #4147
If you have an anonymous comment account, you can now add a signature to your comments.
 
If you do not have an anonymous comment account you can make one here: https://lucycraig.blog/register
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.
Comment attachment by janedoe1

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4135
We Are All Lucy Craig.
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4161
Wow, there are like 100 of them... 700 guys can go dip their wicks! Just remember the Ket

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4133
OK
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4166
iirc, there was a room full of degenerate whores easy to get wet.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4132
A lot in the library already
Comment attachment by Anonymous
@janedoe1 #4121
Massive visual updates without changing functionality or removing any content / comments. Let us know what you think.
Anonymous #4117
Train Doe
Comment attachment by Anonymous
Anonymous #4116
Why were drugs being allowed in campus in first place? Also wiki says its a date rape drug (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketamine#Recreational_use).

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4118
Did they really use drugs?
If yes, is it really Ketamine as she claimed?
Did they force her or she volunteered to consume (given she's already alcohol-intoxicated)?
Did anyone of the 8 (JD/LC+C7) thought how will they be seen in society if the act goes out (leaks) into public?
Where are the ethics & morals of all the 8 before the act?
What are the other 50 folks in the chat group doing (mute spectators, willful ignorance, etc)?
Too many questions to aks bruh.......

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4131
I don’t think everyone view a drug sex party negatively.. especially the elite

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4126
Yes to drugs, ketamine seems likely (some dude overdosed on it the week before, but may not have been the only thing they were snorting). In her statement she says yes to Ketamine and actually tries to black out using it, in her civil claim, she says forced. The guys wouldn't have cared about their reputations except now that its a rape case, Lucy didn't think it through, she was crying in her room for days after been slut-shamed around campus - she thought people would be more openminded. In a civil case, they will ask about their views before the case, in the criminal case (which probably won't happen), Lucy's past will probably be off limits (rape shield). The other 50 - this would have been covered in the Cornell investigation, most were probably asleep, these messages got going at 1:45am. Read her statement though, it will give you a good idea of 1) how ditzy she is, 2) How horney she was for Matt, 3) and that only the third 3some was a bit dodgy, but it included Matt, the guy she would do anything for.
Anonymous #4106
Hey all you evil misogynistic rape apologists. I'm gonna teach you how to be a good person with basic empathy who cares about victims.
 
1. Share allegedly faked screenshots saying "she's gone" because you don't have enough real evidence to justify your opinion.
2. Be anti-SA, but wish rape on alleged rapists who have not been proven to have committed the crime, this signals to everyone you are not performative and you care.
3. Assume everyone who disagrees with you is a rapist. You stand with victims, so do us favours by calling everything rape so that no one takes allegations seriously anymore.
4. Assure everyone that intoxication = no consent, even though Jane could say no and did at many points, it doesn't matter that she said yes because she was intoxicated. We have to believe all women, and we can trust her judgment, because she believes they should have stopped when she slurred her words, but she thought it was appropriate to have a threesome with a guy who was heaving and another guy who was passing out.
5. Believe all victims, unless it's Matthew Ingalls, no one takes him seriously, because by believe victims we mean take the moral high ground, fear monger, and push an agenda.
6. Shame everyone for slut shaming, because promiscuity and empowerment couldn't have lead to Jane changing her story from "our bodies our choice nothing illegal happened" to "I was raped" when she got backlash and got uninvited from the next party with her rapists.
7. Fawning, placation, and denial (which are actually real) is a catch all excuse for anything that doesn't add up. There is no rhyme or reason to trauma it's totally random.
8. When you can say no it's normal to wanna pass out instead so you can charge your sexual partners with rape.
9. When you're being raped, it's normal to wonder why your rapists don't care about your sh scars. Being raped isn't actually a bad or scary experience you have no control over, rapists are nice people who should care.
10. If you say no and they stop, that's not good enough you want your cake and to eat it too. Report them all.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe1 #4114
13. Demand single-sided narrative but when you cannot say what you want to say without doxxing yourself, go to the true free-speech platform (LucyCraig.blog) and speak your mind without fear of doxxing and be welcome to express yourself and attempt to persuade others of your position without censorship.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4111
12. DEMAND all 57 guys be doxxed, but crash the fuck out when anyone types "Lucy"

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4119
True. Either everyone should be called as jane/john doe (name reveal post-verdict) or publicize everyone's names! Now those men will be trashed irrespective of whether they were found guilty or not

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous #4122
They're already known tho

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous #4127
#LucysLaw to protect the identities of all involved and limit what can be published in the press (internet creepers will probably still figure it out, or other people will leak it, but it won't be "official", so hopefully will keep the damage down)

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4110
Well said. 11. A dude snorting Ket of your body IS ALSO RAPE

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4113
Be sure to feed your 10 cats today.
@janedoe1 #4103
I was a sex doll for all intents and purposes, which is sad but, unfortunately, something I'm not used to, or something that I haven't experienced before.
 
~Lucy Craig
 
The wording of this statement is, well.... interesting.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #4104
Imagine being raped and wondering why they don't care about your scars.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4108
lol they know, once a girl starts talking self-harm/eating disorders/being Bi but only fucking guys, it kills the mood...

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous #4170
They like the Bi Shit, Gotta be at least bi-curious to engage in that 3 some and watch. Male 1 allegedly even wanted a 4 some doing anal ; he'd have to feel another dick bumping his for her to get plugged vaginally and anally.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous #4171
Fair point! If one of the boys in the corner had put a thumb in Jonathan or Matt, this could have turned in to a proper orgy
Anonymous #4081
Serious question! Attention everyone. Thumbs up for yes, train for no.
Knowing what you know now, would you let her snort ket off your dick?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4123
Two thumbs up and reached a full train! There you have it folks, pretty conclusive! Jane Doe's cock sniffing days are probably behind her, smacking her ass. We consulted with experts who say her best bet now is to work the glory hole scene
Anonymous #4076
This is part of the decision by Cornell - Redacted AF, but still has her admitting left right and centre that she was consenting. The real problem is that people were invited and saw her naked - which Cornell calls sexual exploitation.
https://www.cbsnews.com/projects/2026/cornell-rape-allegations-documents/docs/EF2026_0292_John_Doe_v_Cornell_University_OTHER_COURT_FILED_D_44.pdf

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4089
https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/DocumentList?docketId=8AD/r5jq1gy2KZscUteAhg==
@janedoe1

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4085
Adding here for the library.
PDF previewTitle IX Findings (Redacted)

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4078
I'm genuinely shocked that nudes of Lucy Craig haven't leaked yet....

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4083
Get your own generative AI, you cheapskate... ngl, you're also a bit creepy

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous #4088
I don't think OP meant nudify nudes. OP was replying to a post that said dozens saw Lucy nekkid. We really believe no one snapped a souvenir?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous #4098
Must be plenty! Imagine if you got a pic of her when she started flexing naked? But if they trace that shit to you, you would be crucified, so if any pictures survived, they are in the top secret spank bank

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 5

Anonymous #4101
Am I evil for wondering why she tried to flex at all to intimidate them or whatever she said? I had second hand embarrassment reading that...

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 6

Anonymous #4109
lol I'm surprised she didn't bark or hiss as well
@janedoe1 #4065
Good night all.
 
UPDATE:
Petitions: These pages got a nice visual update.
 
NEW FEATURE
Press archive: In this section we (the admins) will be adding legacy media article URLs manually as they are published (bare with us) to a internal database. Once added, Lucy Server will feed it automatically to the WayBack Machine and then check for changes every 24hrs. All previous versions, updated archives, etc will become available and searchable and citable. It already works, just not the prettiest yet. We have added about 150 topic related pages already and it is running smoothly.
 
EXPERT CONTRIBUTORS
We have anonymously reached out to various professionals on related topics, to ask them if they would like to contribute -no credit, no glory. Purely to be adding to the marketplace of knowledge, anonymously as we are all doing here. We have received and now published two new articles from external contributors: Moonies and Title IX.
 
Let us know what topics, subjects you would like to have explained in detail and we will try to find an expert to break it down for us.
 
TRANSPARENCY: No comments were hidden today.
 
As always, if there is a new feature or update idea, let us know. We will do our best to incorporate your suggestions -most of the new features were the suggestions of commenters.
 
In the meantime, remember, the answer to speech that you do not like is not censorship, it is more speech. Keep speaking, keep being refined or vulgar, educational or brain dead, just keep speaking. We designed this for you to speak as freely as you desire. No logs, no identity verifications, no emails, phone numbers, text message codes required, no credit cards, no advertisement, no donation links, no self promotions, no tracking pixels.
 
Just pure speech, pure discourse.
 
Have a good night all.
Lucy_Craig_meme_video.mp4

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #4077
Great! I'd be curious about how many details the Lamestream Media try to "memory hole" as this story continues -- the function you describe would catch that.
 
I'd also be curious about which search engines are the most reliable in this case. Obviously, engines tied to Facebook/TikTok/Insta are all Orwellian, censoring "Lucy Craig." (I personally found Yandex to be pretty good.)

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4080
I used Freespoke to find this page
@janedoe1 edited #4056
New Haven high school students Walk Out: "Justice for Jane Doe [Lucy Craig] & All Survivors".
 
Yale socialist club organized a high school student walk out from 5 neighboring high school campuses in support of Lucy Craig on Friday.
 
The socialist put out a statement:
 
To eliminate the influence of wealthy donors and their families, we call to abolish ICE and tax the rich to fund free public college, and for universities to be run democratically by students, workers, and community members. If school communities controlled universities, we could fight to bring real justice for survivors, to make college free, to pay workers fairly, and to invest in high-quality public schools. We need to build a socialist feminist movement that ultimately takes aim at capitalism to bring justice for Jane Doe and end all sexual violence.
Comment attachment by janedoe1

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #4107
I feel sorry for that little cunt with the bill board

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4167
thats probably u with ur cunt

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous #4175
Wait, is he a cunt, or does he have a cunt? Transgender? How do you know? Did you fondle him?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous #4178
I don't have to tell you!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4128
Thought bubble: "I worked on this all morning, and everyone else is on their phones! Suzie hasn't even read it... she will see how sensitive I am! Why won't she just love me? Fucking bitch! Maybe I should do a Donald and grab her by the pussy?"

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #4102
"All survivors" Matthew Ingalls was described in her testimony as passing out. He was uncomfortable with the situation but Jane assured him it was fine. He alleged at points she did anal and oral on him while he was passed out. He said he was too intoxicated to consent. Based on her testimony I don't think she was ever as out of it as Ingalls.
 
All these "good morally superior" people who care so much about SA victims usually paint him as an evil rapist who deserves to be mutilated, raped, thrown in prison, you name it based on an accusation that has not yet been proven. An accusation he made against Jane as well.
 
These are not good people, they are fucking evil.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #4063
From gang bang straight to communism.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4169
the gang bang is communism

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4068
Communal pussy upstairs

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4067
And if you are worried about global warming, friction from rape has been shown to generate heat! Support Lucy by donating to savetheglaciers.,com

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #4057
Anything for a day off lol

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4069
From snowdays to hoedays
@janedoe1 #4054
NEW PETITION: END THE MEDIA GATEKEEPING - RELEASE THE EVIDENCE IN THE LUCY CRAIG / JANE DOE CASE | Demand transparency, impartial reporting, and the publication of source materials by legacy news organizations.
 
Anonymous #4049
Has anyone done Ketamine? If so, what was your experience?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4075
one thumbs up and 3 trains? Sounds about right!
@janedoe1 #4042
We are now actively archiving mainstream media and providing source material to the archives so that if something changes on the article, it will be preserved and to provide as complete information as possible for the examination of the topic and the resulting public debate. https://lucycraig.blog/wayback (bare with us as we try to create the best user experience for this new feature).
Anonymous #4037
Now they are implying Cornell police are corrupt and protected the boys. I guess they are trying to deny the police report.
 
https://www.timesunion.com/state/article/fraternity-official-claimed-called-favors-22464094.php

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4070
What hasn't been asked, regarding authority figures, is what fucking business of Cornell was any of this really? Expand that for anything else really. For an educational institute, make sure your qualifiations are up to date, the courses are dispensed well and other shit like this.
The whole thing stinks like some form of government over reach (around). You almost know that if it was a case of two males getting into a fist fight on the grounds outside of the Cornell, then Cornell would not care.
Maybe someone who understands the laws better can confirm this or not, but the point of this comment is that it seems the Cornell 7 have a great case for a lawsuit against Cornell.
It just looks like complete shit and overreach (around) by yet another government institute (always follow money, certification and so on). It's not just for cases like this, but all kinds of things you might class as personal. Who the fuck is Cornell to pass some sort of judgement on them?
Break up with your gf/bf and then the College/University can pass some sort of judgement? Meanwhile, fuck this penis envying, 'female hyena', power playing whore. Her and the rest of her kind. As full of shit as their men are.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4079
Agree. Universities should just be a business of research and education, not babysitting and policing.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4041
Yet they took her slutty statement, and investigated her slutty story, and filed her slutty charges. I wish the police force everywhere was that corrupt!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4039
Just like how this skank refuses to even read the police report: https://lucycraig.blog/_wijdr/comment/3923

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4038
Dumb sluts are using the Spaghetti Strategy at this point. This case jumped the shark a week ago, when skank Lucy Craig's "our bodies our choice asf" texts hit.