# Comment attachment by janedoe1

Source: https://lucycraig.blog/media/741
File: AYq6J4jC7aReHO16.mp4
Format: video/mp4
Description: 
Alt text: 

## OCR / extracted text



## Transcript

[00:00] With regard to the here, I'm gonna tell you what the most interesting thing it is and you tell me if you felt the same
[00:05] So we know that there was a hearing regarding
[00:09] Basically getting rid of tish James as the special prosecutor
[00:13] She was appointed by New York governor Kathy Huckle the reason why one
[00:19] One here's the interesting part of the Cornell seven
[00:22] filed a motion to
[00:24] basically get rid of her or have somebody else
[00:28] and more neutral, special prosecutor appointed.
[00:32] Tell them what she did.
[00:33] Because of comments, comments that Tish James made,
[00:36] I mean, Kathy Hochel made her own comments,
[00:38] but Tish James made some comments
[00:40] that really indicated objectively,
[00:43] that you can't even,
[00:44] you can't interpret them any other way,
[00:46] that she is biased.
[00:48] She called the accuser a survivor, one example.
[00:53] And I think she said that she shouldn't have been forced
[00:55] to endure, would she endure?
[00:58] Yeah, you know, John, that is anyone
[01:00] who's being intellectually honest,
[01:01] even those who believe these guys committed rape
[01:04] would have to agree with Judge Farrell's question
[01:07] during the hearing when he asked, quote,
[01:10] you would agree with me that it's not proper
[01:12] for a prosecutor to make those statements, right?
[01:15] He asked it numerous times.
[01:17] And I've ranted on this show about that.
[01:19] I am, I don't know what happened.
[01:21] I really don't.
[01:22] But I need an independent investigation
[01:25] that's not from someone who's already
[01:26] aligned themselves with the victim
[01:28] and eliminated the defense's theory
[01:31] that this could have been consensual.
[01:34] True.
[01:35] And from what we know that's out in the public sphere,
[01:40] there is some evidence that it was consensual,
[01:43] but I digress it.
[01:44] Here's the other interesting thing
[01:46] that this Judge Judge Farrell did.
[01:48] So one of the seven filed this motion.
[01:50] Now, when you have multiple defendants in any case, if one person sort of leads the
[01:55] charge, whatever ruling would affect the other party.
[01:59] So if you agree with that motion, and you're one of the other six, you kind of sit back,
[02:05] all right?
[02:06] I didn't have to do the work.
[02:07] They do the work.
[02:08] But Judge Ferrell said, hang on a second.
[02:09] How come you're the only guy up here?
[02:11] How come nobody else has filed this motion along with you?
[02:14] Right, right.
[02:15] Right?
[02:16] What are we going to have?
[02:17] her on your case, but the others will still have her.
[02:21] So we're gonna have two prosecutors.
[02:23] These are legitimate questions, yes?
[02:25] Yes, but it would be very rare
[02:28] to have multiple prosecutors on one case.
[02:31] I don't know if I've ever seen that happen.
[02:34] Multiple special prosecutors, right?
[02:36] I don't think I've seen that happen.
[02:37] But here's what I thought.
[02:38] I'm like, well, maybe Judge Farrell should get credit
[02:41] because what if, what if, hypothetically,
[02:44] these guys do get indicted for something.
[02:47] Oh, you think?
[02:48] As if it's even not, it's gonna happen.
[02:52] We know that that's what justice means
[02:53] to this governor and Leticia James.
[02:55] I hate to say it.
[02:57] But then what if, Mark,
[02:59] what if some of these defendants moved for severance?
[03:03] Now you don't have them all together.
[03:07] And maybe that was a little foreshadowing by this judge.
[03:12] deep. That is that is very ocean deep, Johnna. I don't know that that was the plan. I just think
[03:20] maybe the others probably agreed with my analysis and that is while it's completely unfair in the
[03:27] court of public opinion for Leticia James to remain on this case and she should have already
[03:31] taken a step back to give the image of of a fair neutral hearing. The issue isn't ripe yet.
[03:39] By that, I mean, the harm hasn't happened legally.
[03:45] If Letitia James decides not to file charges
[03:49] against certain ones or all of them,
[03:52] then the judge shouldn't have to rule at this time.
[03:55] It's not right yet.
[03:57] You wait until the harm occurs,
[03:59] and then you say, okay, it's improper.
[04:02] And that's not what I would wanna do if this is my boy,
[04:05] but I think that's how the judge is gonna rule.
[04:07] because you don't want the harm to occur.
[04:09] I think part of the fear is that, as you just said,
[04:12] she will indict for something.
[04:14] You can indict at a ham sandwich.
[04:16] But now we're talking.
[04:17] It's like just to jump ahead with the Lindsey Clancy
[04:20] gag order, it's like, oh, you think that his comments
[04:24] in the future might.
[04:26] Well, it's not really ripe yet.
[04:29] There's no harm just yet.
[04:31] You've got a woman who says she can be fair.
[04:34] I mean, this is the legal analysis,
[04:36] and she hasn't ruled yet.
[04:38] And I would love for her to be gone,
[04:41] but who do you think that hurts the sole defendants position,
[04:47] the one that's moving to recuse her as a prosecutor
[04:51] that the others didn't join in?
[04:54] No, I don't think it hurts him,
[04:57] except that the judge is giving the others time to join in.
[05:01] So it's delaying the ruling, perhaps just a little bit.
[05:06] So but I don't think at the end of the day, it will hurt him.
[05:09] I think he has legitimate reason.
[05:10] And everybody has legitimate reason to want to get rid of her,
[05:13] whether they actually move for that or not is going to be completely up
[05:17] to each individual defendant.
[05:19] But she's not the only one who's who's bias.
[05:21] And while we still have a few minutes here, I do want to play.
[05:25] If you don't mind. So Netflix. Yes.
[05:28] What do they call it?
[05:29] They're calling it an insta doc.
[05:31] I've never heard of it.
[05:32] Insta doc.
[05:32] I guess that's just a documentary that's put together really fast.
[05:36] Yeah, sounds like it.
[05:37] Yeah, yeah, because it was pretty quick.
[05:39] It's only like a one-part documentary,
[05:42] 30-something minutes maybe, you know, it wasn't.
[05:45] It was kind of cashing in on this scenario for right now.
[05:49] Cashing in as if these guys have been tried and convicted
[05:53] and they haven't even been charged with any crime yet.
[05:56] You got to remember the only thing that's out there so far
[06:00] is a civil complaint for money damages, OK?
[06:04] But just in case you're wondering
[06:06] whether the governor of New York who appointed Tish James,
[06:09] the special prosecutor, also might have some bias,
[06:12] can we please play?
[06:15] It's not two and three.
[06:16] Yeah, it's not two and three.
[06:18] Yeah.
[06:19] Let's do that.
[06:22] Allegedly, it became unconcential as more brothers
[06:26] were invited upstairs.
[06:29] The district attorney said criminal charges
[06:31] weren't pursued because the evidence
[06:33] was insufficient to constitute sexual assault.
[06:39] My first reaction was,
[06:41] how disgusting.
[06:44] This institution was gonna fulfill her dream,
[06:47] and instead it became her nightmare.
[06:48] I told Jane Doe, I want to write a story.
[06:52] You never know what is going to ignite something.
[06:57] Our administration can't only be responding now
[07:01] because they're under the pressure of national news.
[07:04] None of us expected it to be like this.
[07:07] This case, the scale of this, the number of people involved
[07:11] and the repugnancy of her allegations
[07:14] would have drawn you to the local police department
[07:17] fairly quickly.
[07:19] Campus police, technically, they are
[07:21] depotized by the local police to function
[07:24] as a policing organization on a campus.
[07:26] But one can very quickly see that there could be a conflict
[07:30] because you're also protecting the reputation
[07:33] of your boss, the university.
[07:36] Is it your belief that Cornell's police
[07:39] was influenced by conflict of interest in this case?
[07:42] No, I have no evidence of that.
[07:43] And I'm not saying that that was necessarily the case.
[07:46] But in a situation like this, you
[07:48] want to make sure that people believe in the process.
[07:51] I called the university president
[07:54] and said I want to have an independent investigation.
[07:57] I want outside counsel to look at all the actions
[08:00] of the university.
[08:01] When the Tompkins County District Attorney announced that he was reopening the case, he
[08:07] pointed to Jane Doe's statement and said it did not establish that a crime had occurred.
[08:13] But new reporting raises serious questions about the information his office relied upon
[08:18] when it made that decision.
[08:20] And that's why I believe this case demands a special prosecutor who will provide a
[08:25] fresh and thorough review of all the facts, including the information that has recently
[08:30] come to life. Prove to me and the public and the campus and this young woman that everything
[08:37] you did was correct.
[08:40] John, I am so offended by so many things that she said. Okay, first and foremost, when she
[08:47] heard that the prosecutor didn't pick up any charges, didn't file any charges, her
[08:54] first and only thought process was just how corrupt, how horrible, how unfortunate, whatever
[09:00] word she wants to use. Okay, not I don't know. I'm not a
[09:05] prosecutor. I didn't get my hands dirty on this one. Maybe I
[09:08] should talk to them and see why they don't have proof beyond
[09:11] it to the exclusion of every reasonable doubt. That's the
[09:13] first thing. And then the second thing is how effing
[09:16] hypocritical of her to suggest the campus police. Thank
[09:20] you. Take that one. Go. I think you share the same.
[09:23] All right. So she comes out on this Insta doc and says,
[09:26] Oh, well, you know, we should we should assume that
[09:29] that there's a conflict of interest
[09:30] because the campus police work for the campus
[09:33] and therefore they wanna make their boss,
[09:36] i.e. the president of the campus, look good.
[09:39] That's a conflict of interest.
[09:41] But then, Mark, who does she appoint as special prosecutor?
[09:47] It's ridiculous.
[09:48] Since James worked for Cathy Hockel,
[09:51] she would wanna make her boss look good.
[09:53] Cathy Hockel wants somebody who's gonna make
[09:56] Kathy Hockel looked good.
[09:58] Oh my God, can she like add both sides of her mouth?
[10:02] Finally, not that we needed confirmation.
[10:05] We assume she's a bright, savvy politician,
[10:07] so she knows about the image of impropriety.
[10:10] But here she's laying it out in this documentary
[10:13] that the campus police gives the image of impropriety
[10:17] because they could be covering for their bosses.
[10:19] Similarly, you're appointing Leticia James.
[10:22] It is so parallel that she should immediately
[10:26] get anybody else, I joked on one show, pick carrot top.
[10:30] At least he hasn't prejudged the case.
[10:33] Here's how most people find out
[10:34] their Medicare plan changed.
[10:36] They don't get a phone call.
[10:37] The notice comes in the mail,
[10:39] in an envelope that almost nobody opens.
[10:41] They walk up to the pharmacy counter in January
[10:44] and the price is different.
[10:45] Medicare plans change every year
[10:47] and some go away entirely.
[10:49] For most people, the window to make changes
[10:50] closes December 7th, and after that, they are locked in for the year.
[10:55] This is why you need to know about the independent Medicare advisors at Chapter.
[10:59] Not a plan, not an insurance company.
[11:01] They're the only Medicare advisors that compare every plan nationwide, so Chapter can put
[11:06] your prescriptions and your doctors against every option you've got for 2027.
[11:11] If you're on the right plan, they will tell you.
[11:13] If you're not, they will help you switch.
[11:14] So do it today.
[11:15] Don't wait until you hit the deadline or miss it.
[11:19] chapter at 910-375-5179. That's 910-375-5179 or use the link in our description.

## Machine-readable JSON

https://lucycraig.blog/media/741/index.json