Public discussion • Comment #4843

Community contribution

2026-11-07T18:13:43+00:00

I have one piece of advice: stay in your BlueSky bubble because you won't survive outside of a woke echo chamber. You clearly have no idea what you're talking about. Your own comment rejects it's own logic. First of all, children do need two parents. This idea that one parent is enough is why kids end up being attention seeking whores who snort ketamine off of random penises. You literally go on to say that Lucy didn't get enough attention from her parents right after saying kids only need one parent. Well, if they had two parents they would have more attention, assuming both parents are decent people who invest time into their child. The likelihood of one or more parents not meeting that criteria increases if they didn't have both parents growing, so it's a cycle of poor parenting that leads to poor parenting, however I doubt that is the full story with Lucy. It seems that while she was in university her mind was infected with this destructive variant of feminism that OnlyFans models utilize to feel justified and empowered to be a slut for the entire world. Here's the part people don't tend to talk about: people are largely stupid, short sighted, and selfish. This is important not just in reference to the parent topic, but also the Cornell case. Everyone involved in the case is immature and dumb for participating, but the only one who did anything illegal (aside from the drug related aspect) is Lucy by filing a false police report against the guys, who never defied her only stated boundary of no 4some because "butt-stuff". Apparently she was sober enough to do some advanced math and was able to calculate her hole-to-penis ratio outcomes. Anyway, the point is that she realized a little too late how stupid her "our body our choice af" blue-pill femosphere bs mentality was when the harsh reality that conservatism is actually the natural reaction people have to her behavior dawned on her. People have instincts the are derived from their genetic nature and social conservatism largely lines up with that nature while progressivism intentionally tries to reject it. After hundreds of thousands of years of trial and error you think we havent figured out what works best for humanity? We have, and the blueprint for that way of life can be found in the Bible, whether you believe in God or not. Thats why the greatest country of all time was founded and built on Christian values. However, we currently have Marxist Globalists trying everything in their power to manipulate the population into rejecting their very nature in order to weaken the strongest society the world has ever seen so it can be taken over by their perverse ideology. And just for the record, we don't think that the women we date represent all of the women in the world, that's a ridiculous absolute that only a childish moron would think. I know that my wife is a rare gem in this godless society of ketamine dick sniffing harlots who falsely cry rape. It seems to me that you're projecting by generalizing an entire subset of men, which also happens to be the largest subset of American men (Conservatives). I hope you eventually grow out of this childish progressive phase like I eventually did and find yourself a redpilled husband that will change your perspective of men.

View within the discussion →

Reader comments are their authors' views and do not represent verified findings or editorial conclusions.