Community contribution

The statement is a disaster for her case, she seems to say that in her interview she give a lot more information, so that will make a difference, because if she is consistent with her statement it will hurt. My feeling is, the title 9 would have looked at her statement, and from what little ive seen, the story lines up in title 9. So between the halloween debacle and mid year 2025, her story was consistently one of sexual assault and rape so there is no "confusion". Then her statement says she was forced to have sex with matt... Thats a problem... You cant hide that she was fucking gagging for sex with him. Also, if you look at her internal monologue (i was excited about the threesome and them being gay, i said yes to snorting ket off my body then covered my face in embarressment, i had done ket already so why not do some more... Etc. I dont think trauma involves the generation of memories like this! I think she would interpret memories differently, or remeber additional things later. Her certainty is entirely based on how high she was not saying or indicating no. I hope she learns the meaning of consent, voluntary intoxication, incaoacitation, and the requirement that the boys shoukd have known she was not consenting, and then sues her lawyer for not telling her this and having her push for a criminak case knowing she could never win