Lucy Craig is Jane Doe - 100% Verified logo Lucy Craig is Jane Doe - 100% Verified
THE RECORD · THE ARGUMENT · THE RESPONSE

Who Is
Jane Doe
Really?

Evidence. Due process. Competing narratives. The record deserves scrutiny.

Open the evidence libraryRead the argumentJoin the discussion
✍ Sign the petition
WHY THIS EXISTS

Controversial cases still require evidence, process, and room for dissent.

This site is built to present opposition, documentary material, competing interpretations, and public discussion without treating allegations as adjudicated facts. Court records, attributed reporting, editorial argument, and reader comments are labeled as different kinds of material.

REPORTING CREDIT

Reporting that helped frame the public questions

The links below are credited to Richard Luthmann / NY News Press. Linking or discussing them does not convert their assertions into findings of fact.

Richard Luthmann — Cornell Seven: Evidence Before Election Theater Psy-Op ↗Richard Luthmann — BREAKING: Cornell Seven Accuser Unmasked ↗NY News Press — Cornell Seven Accuser Unmasked ↗NY News Press — Cornell Seven Evidence ↗
LATEST

Articles & analysis

Rice Purity Quiz

Take the Rice Purity Quiz As If You Were Lucy Craig

We’ve recreated the 100-question Rice Purity Test, allowing you to explore it through the lens of the publicly available records, police reports, court...

2026-11-10Analysis

Rice Purity, Mom Lore, and Lucy Craig

One of the most revealing messages in the Cornell Seven controversy is also one of the most casually written. Understanding two pieces of Gen Z slang helps...

2026-11-08ARTICLE

Reproduction of Key Text Messages

Read the text exchanges reproduced here.

2026-11-08ARTICLE

The 20-Year Loophole?

Two recent court decisions, an expired ordinary filing deadline, questionable reliance on criminal statutes, and a conspicuously missing fifth cause of...

2026-11-05Legal Commentary

Lucy Craig Wants Another 60 Days. The Court Should Say No.

Nearly two years after the alleged events, Lucile H. Craig's attorneys want to delay Diego Sarabia's motion to dismiss—while defending a complaint that...

2026-11-05Opinion

BREAKING: Jacqueline Kelly, the Cornell Graduate Who Must Now Prove She Can Investigate Cornell

Letitia James has hired an outside lawyer to lead the Cornell 7 investigation. Her selection raises a rather inconvenient question: when does independence...

2026-11-04
PUBLIC RECORD

Documents should be inspectable, searchable, and quotable in context.

Every public Library item gets a dedicated page. PDFs are rendered responsively, OCR is searchable, video/audio transcripts are timestamped, and clicking a transcript segment jumps the media to that point.

Browse library

New docket entries · last 24 hours

Loading recent docket filings…

DISCUSSION

Topics controlled by the administrators; comments controlled by their authors.

A Place For Memes
This discussion forums is for all your Lucy Craig, Cornell 7, memes. We want to have the definitive collection of meme art about Lucy Craig.

Big Tish James
Should Big Tish James be involved in the investigation and prosecution of the Cornell 7?

Can a woman consent to sex if she is voluntarily intoxicated?
Lucy Craig engaged in voluntary consumption of alcohol and illegal substances. Is she capable of consent? And if not, are the men, who were also drinking and consuming illegal substances, according to public reporting, capable of consent? Can they claim that they were raped by Lucy Craig?

Did Lucy Craig Rape Those Drunken Boys?
Her texts say she was not drunk. The bar says she was not drunk. The boys were drunk. Did Lucy Craig (AKA "JANE DOE") rape those boys? Leave a comment with your opinion.

Discuss: Should Lucy Craig Sue Thomas Guiffra?
Thomas Guiffra's famefag attention seeking, publicity stunts have backfired. It is now known that he was leaking records related to the case (the poorly redacted afformation in support of proceeding as Jame Doe was only in possession of the person who filed it). He named a U.S. Active Service Marine, lied about a swat event, filed a fake DMCA in bad faith to this blog, named an incorrect person as a defendant, misrepresents New York's dram shop liability laws against Moonies, and named an entity that doesn't actually exists on paper. His hope was, similar to the Comb's cases, to throw shit against the wall, leak favorable documents, cancel anyone who speaks against his client, and sway the public sympathy. That backfired, with help from LucyCraog.blog. As her case becomes a comedy of errors, we ask you, should Lucile H. Craig sue Thomas Guiffra and his firm for malpractice?

Freedom of Speech
We do not care about your feelings, we do care about freedom of speech. Share and post any legal speech you want. Send us your images, videos, text messages, voice recordings or any other related material for immediate publication without censorship.

THE LATEST DISCUSSION

Latest comments

Loading latest comments…

PUBLIC DISCUSSION

Comments & replies

No account is required. Comment anonymously, or sign in with a pseudonymous account if you want to manage your comments later. Comments are user speech, not editorial findings.

Posting anonymously — no login required.
Optional: sign in or create a pseudonymous username to edit/delete your comments later.
@janedoe1 edited #4980
"NowThis Impact" has over 2m followers on X. They hold themselves out to be a "news" corporation, but are really just a far-left radical antagonist.
 
In the first sentence of their recent post about the dismissal motions in the Lucy Craig matter, they get details incorrect. As simple of a matter as the court venue location. The lawsuit is venued in New York City, not Ithaca.
 
 
An account that gets the little details incorrect cannot be trusted with the big, complex, or much more important details, yet these are the accounts that will propagate the single sided narrative and demand for others to be suspended for "misinformation".
 
(*) While there is a pending motion by Moonies Bar to change venue, there is no decision on that motion as yet. The motion is fully plead and pending decision -but given this judge's proclivities for favoring the Plaintiff Lucy Craig it is unknown what the decision will be. Those documents, along with every docket filing, are available in the Library on this site. The decision will become immediately appealable as soon as it is issued (courts cannot excerise jurisdiction when they do not have it, so any jurisdiction issue must be resolved before the merits -thus the judge wants to try to quickly force the dismissal motions while holding on to a technical decision that could reverse and remove the case from her to an entirely new venue (in Ithaca) later. She is famefagging for as long as she can, because jurisidiction is almost certainly incorrect -the sole basis for jurisdiction are 2 points: 1) at the time the lawsuit was filed Lucy lived in New York City -standing alone this is not acceptable, and 2) Cornell has a satellite location in New York City - also flimsy grounds for jurisdiction against all defendants with a slightly better chance against Cornell, but even flimsy against Cornell since the allegations accused took place in Ithaca. Regardless, for the time being, the dismissal orders as presented by NowThis Impact are being heard in New York City, not Ithaca.
 
https://x.com/nowthisimpact/status/2121068046957654023
“Debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open.”

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 (1964). Majority opinion.
Comment attachment by janedoe1
Anonymous #4976
Dismissal hearing for Sarabia on 10 Feb; I see Chi Phi wants out too! Moonies and the Scotts will probably file as well.
 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/judge-schedules-dismissal-hearings-in-jane-doe-lawsuit-against-cornell-and-chi-phi/ar-AA2heJlI
Anonymous #4953
Guys, don't slut-fuck-shame dudes who would fuck Lucy Craig! Any port in a storm!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4958
You: "A hole is a hole, whether an ear or an anus"
 
You're a disgusting sick fuck, a degenerate, and a nigger brain. "Men" like you are the reason the west is falling. Straight sex without the intention of having a child and faggot sex are the same thing and leading to the fall of the west.
 
In this situation, Lucy Craig is in the wrong for having sex with these boys, and these boys are in the wrong for saying yes and wanting to have sex with her.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4977
I hope you have big ears, because I am going to jizz directly on your brain

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4970
Based and tradcath/ortho pilled

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous #4978
Nope, Christianity centers around 1) Love they neighbour, 2) Judge not lest ye be judged, 3) Let he who is without sin cast the first stone, 4) Do unto others so doesn't fit at all. Judaism isn't so overbearing and considers itself western. That's why I assumed Muslim... Maybe he has his own religion though? Minority of 1? Let's ask him when he gets back from whacking off to white women showing their ankles.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous #4979
1. You can love someone and point out their sin, in fact the bible says to confess and hold each other accountable.
2. Judge not lest you be judged is about judging someone's soul, as in "you're going to hell!" don't do that.
3. We are not stoning her tho?
4. Okay yeah he was pretty harsh, but the overall message that he was being degenerate is still true.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 5

Anonymous #4982
Wow, i hope you are being serious... You cant love someone and attack them. If you use hate speech while doing it, you are failing far more as a christian and human being than someone who likes sex.
 
He was judging someones soul (in fact, a whole civilisations) but that its not about that, its pointing out the speck in someone elses ey while ignoring the beam in yours. This isnt about the final judgement of your soul, its about judging people harshly while ignoring your faults (look at the context, being literal doesnt mean ignoring context, that is someone manipulating you by selective reading) , because judgement is... Hostile! , not part of loving your neighbour. Teaching is not the same as harsh judgement.
 
This post is an example of teaching.
 
And you are being way too literally with the first stone thing... And i think you know it... , the principal there is very obvious, dont harm someone for being sinful when you yourself are sinful. Do you think if they were breaking he knee caps, the same idea would not apply? What about a punch in the face? What about a slap in the face? Hate speech and harmful speech is an assault do you think Jesus would fail to confront someone for doing it? This ties perfectly with love and non judgement. .. My interpretation is more consistent. In fact the literal interpretation of certain phrases without there context to the point where they stop being consistent is a deliberate misinterpretation
 
Your knowledge of the passages beats most people, but if you end up with a bunch of rules that lets you spew hate, you have lost the message.
 
If you are vicious and hateful, you have failed as a christian, and contrary to what you probably think, jesus says if you dont live by the rules, he will know acknowledge you when its time for judgement - saying you believe in christ without living it, is a lie, and, if you believe in jesus, you should believe it is impossible to lie to him about this - lying is also a sin.
 
If you are serious, i urge you to speak to a bible scholar and get away from this selective interpretation that allows people to justify anything that is unkind or ill intentioned - this is not being honest, and that is false witness.
 
I will give you a modern analogy, Sarbane oxley is a titanic rule book for financial reporting and governance it tries to pick out every scenario and tell you what you do. Other codes like King are principal based, so they say "misrepresentation is not allowed" rather than trying to cover every scenerio, because it is impossible to do so. The bible does not cover every scenario, stoning but not knee capping? So jesus gave his primary commandment to give you the principal : love thy neighbour. This is ranked (by jesus) directly below love god, becaise it is the foundation for everything else.
 
Im an atheist, but i take this seriously.
 
Im told i need to stay on topic, so, Lucy Craig is bearing false witness. Why is this bad? Because it deliberately hurts others which is not consistent with hurting others. She had judged them without admitting her own behaviour, so she has come to the wrong conclusion to base her actions on (judge not). So, by seeing them as something less than herself (psychiatric problem im sure), she is not loving her neighbour. Thats it, in a nutshell.
 
You could say she believes she was wronged and its unfair to expect someone to turn the other cheek (this is where modern morality suoercedes the bible), but if she were being honest, she would admit fault, and that the harm does not amount to rape and, and eye for an eye, ruining their lives is not commensurate with what actually happened.
 
Urg, waiting for the backlash and some dope to say she loved her neighbours too much, but i hope you will give this due consideration

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4965
Lol tell me your mother molested you without telling me your mom molested you.
 
Seriously though, you were not responsible for that cunts roaming hands, and you need to let go of your hatred for women, because that filthy deseased whore is gone and you are safe! You dont have to force yourself in to a hetrosexual marriage just to appease allah, you can adopt! your happiness matters, and he doesnt exist anyway!
 
There is a little girl inside you crying to get out and suck cock, you need to listen to her. And move to the west! We wont judge you because we know that you getting it in the ass means two less guys for us to compete with!
 
Peace be with you, and you might still have a shot at 1000 x 13 year olds when you die!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous #4968
homo

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous #4971
Sapien! Damn right, thanks fag!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 5

Anonymous #4972
I meant homosexual!!!!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4960
That escalated quickly.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous #4966
Ive offered him some sage advice, hopefully he will listen with an open heart and let go of his childhood trauma, and embrace his inner drag queen.
Anonymous #4951
I'd like a weight chart to figure out her BAC based on her statement. Coma? DOA ? Walk a mile???????????????????

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4954
Based on this pic (I figured the booth and mail box would help), ChatGPT says 5'6". Based on that height and the picture with Aiden at the gym, it estimates 155lbs. (mid-points of the ranges). Not clear how huge her meaty thighs are, or exactly how tall that booth is, apparently they do vary.
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4952
This would be interesting! I'm sure they will do this for the court cases, but we won't get to see it, so we need our own estimates.
Anonymous #4947
I think consentual sex with this hideous monster wo/man thing should indeed be a criminal offense. Not rape, but criminal none-the-less.
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4950
Can we get AI to figure out how tall she is? (she only takes pictures with aiden or selfies.... No other friends apparently? ). Also her bra size! Enquirng minds need to know

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4948
Arrest me: I'd jizz inside her -- provided that I wasn't part of a train (except maybe the engine choo choo 🚂) 😆

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4959
You: "A hole is a hole, whether an ear or an anus"
You're a disgusting sick fuck, a degenerate, and a nigger brain. "Men" like you are the reason the west is falling. Straight sex without the intention of having a child and faggot sex are the same thing and leading to the fall of the west.
In this situation, Lucy Craig is in the wrong for having sex with these boys, and these boys are in the wrong for saying yes and wanting to have sex with her.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous #4967
You must be the life of the party 🎉

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous #4964
Lets agree to disagree? So long as yoir agree this wasnt rape, everything else is subjective
Anonymous #4942
Fuck, I'm addicted to this website, I must make up 25% of the page visits! Seen a funny post on here? That was me! Written by someone else? Fuck them, its mine! Prove me wrong!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4943
I would snort ket off Lucy! (this websites server)

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

@janedoe1 #4945
🤣 🤣 🤣
“Debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open.”

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 (1964). Majority opinion.
Anonymous #4925
Okay. The trippiest part of the whole night:
 
Not the:
 
  • gangbangs,
  • ket off dicks and tits
  • someone robbing her car
...
 
No, it was that there were two Scotts.
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4930
Oh Lucy, did that Soul Bond mean nothing to you?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4927
lol If only they had spit roasted her, she wouldn't be able to explain it to the police.
Cop: "Sorry ma'am, which Scott was which?"
Lucy: "I don't know! I don't interrogate strangers who want to fuck me! What am I? Close-minded? Geezuz! Mouth Scott had the bigger penis - can't you go check? I never forget a dick!"
Cop: "Saints preserve us..."
Lucy: "And OMG, don't call me ma'am, I'm like your daughters age! Your cute, naughty daughter who wears short skirts...UUUUHHHH I feel a threesome coming on!"
Cop: "Ma'am! There is smoke coming from your crotch!"
Lucy: "UUUUH! And bring the handcuffs! AHHH!" pencil ticks Rice Purity 61, 62, 83, questionmark 99
@janedoe1 edited #4920
Should we create a new blog dedicated to viral cancel culture stories like the 3 girls at Ol' Miss who aped the flunking black girl?
 
Turns out there is far more to that story than the media is reporting.
“Debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open.”

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 (1964). Majority opinion.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #4924
If there is evidence that the black girl was racist and provoked it, then I would say yes - racisim by black people is something that desperately needs attention. Otherwise if those girls turned the conflict in that direction, then its a lost cause, and those silly bitches are up shit creek without a klansman
Anonymous #4916
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBveQ-LLUyY
 
lolyer is back at it

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4928
Dude is a Famefag (my new favourite word, thank you LucyCraig.blog)

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

@janedoe1 #4937
You're welcome.
“Debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open.”

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 (1964). Majority opinion.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4917
Video is already in the library.
7gUDiNLebYOI6_QX.mp4
Anonymous #4906
Cornell, sensing a lolsuit was coming, tried to pressure Chi Phi to accept all the blame. Chi Phi said hell no.
7gUDiNLebYOI6_QX.mp4

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4914
OMF, Cornell is going to bleed money. And Chi Phi...Couldn't they just randomly generate some other greek letters and start a new brand for Cornell? Nu Chi Phi?
@janedoe1 #4896
Here is some irony:
 
The retards at Cornell Sun, who conspired with Lucy Criag and her lolwyer to dox the frat boys but not Lucy Craig, once employed Esat Braveboy (what a fucking name eh?) as a writer.
 
Who is Esat Braveboy? Well, he was sued in 2023 for drugging and raping women at Cornell. Did Cornell Sun dox him? Nope! They quitely removed his bi-lines and profile and remained quite.
 
New York Post (no paywall):
https://nypost.com/2026/11/09/us-news/cornell-student-paper-blasted-out-names-of-alleged-frat-rapists-but-scrubbed-bylines-of-own-writer-accused-of-sex-assaults/
 
People magazine (no paywall):
https://people.com/cornell-accused-of-ignoring-reports-of-former-students-alleged-repeated-sex-assaults-12245865
 
We are going to follow up on this story, get more information, and publish all the records of all the employees of CornellSun in the coming days.
 
Unlike traditional legacy media, we are self hosted, reliant on no policy (except the voices in our heads), no service providers, no government rules, laws, or regulations (our technology is completely decentralized). So, we will be researching and following up after do a deep, deep, dive into the CornellSun.
“Debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open.”

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 (1964). Majority opinion.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #4907
Also, the "reporter" who doxxed the accused (that cunt Cereese Qusba) needs to be vetted and dragged.
 
For starters, her articles at the Sun should be checked to see if she used AI in composing the articles....
Anonymous #4891
I feel like all these tough guy white knight guys simping and yelling online got a lot quieter when the picture came out and they saw she isn't even hot. Like these stupid low iq simp guys were practically ready to go lynch innocent men, then they got real quiet all of a sudden once they saw the picture and were like, meh
Anonymous #4887
I keep calling for it, but can you imagine the backlash from narcissist bitches if they did get her psyche evaluation, and that counted against her? Maybe this case is like god giving the world a second (or 20 millionth) chance to actually get shit together and make rational decisions - personality disorder, history of hypersexuality, THAT statement, those text = Lucy in Jail. Then, at least, something good would have come of this shit show.
@janedoe1 edited #4879
Lucy Craig has blocked our intermediary on Instagram. 🤣 as if we don't have 500 instagram accounts to lurk with.
“Debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open.”

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 (1964). Majority opinion.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #4899
So cute! She noticed you. Like two baby deers in the forest giving each other a fright. Next time, she might engage, then as the seasons change, a growing warmth and acceptance until, one day...new baby deers! Its the circle of life.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #4883
More evidence that Lucy Craig is not just a whore - she's a STUPID whore. Wonder why her lolyer hasn't told his client to stay the fuck off of IG? (BTW, the defense should subpoena Lucy's IG -- might be some useful fodder.)

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4889
Yes! She was following around 2000 people, including "Call her Daddy". Suddenly, she has cut that list down to 200, and is building it back up with the kind of thing that good girls might follow. She is trying to sanitise her on-line presence

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #4881
lol I got instragram just to check out her profile

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #4880
“Debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open.”
Like Lucy!
@janedoe1 #4875
Of the “hundreds of studies” Thomas Giuffra claims to have read, how many specifically support his assertion that friendly, apparently enthusiastic communications following an alleged sexual assault are manifestations of denial? And which studies establish the denial–shame–acceptance sequence he has proposed?
 
We have assembled a team of counselors, rape specialists, law enforcement professionals, attorneys, a prosecutor, and two rape survivors to prepare a paper examining the literature on Rape Trauma Syndrome in light of the claims Giuffra made during his Fox News interview.
 
Several points are already clear. Giuffra has stated that he has reviewed hundreds of studies and that none contradict his position. This is false. Rape Trauma Syndrome is expressly addressed in the court rules. Under Rule 7.10, which draws from the New York Court of Appeals decision in People v. Taylor, 75 N.Y.2d 277 (1990), expert testimony on Rape Trauma Syndrome may be used only to explain certain post-event behaviors; it cannot be used to prove that a rape occurred.
 
There is a substantial body of research that contradicts Giuffra’s claims; we will address it in detail in the forthcoming paper. The quantitative evidence on “unacknowledged rape” (the category most relevant to his argument) is limited. In Littleton, Layh & Rudolph (2018), for example, only 104 women who met the researchers’ criteria for having been raped were studied. Of those, 17% were classified as being in denial or as unacknowledged victims. Among that 17%, the percentage who maintained friendly communications with the perpetrator was less than 1%. These cases are extreme outliers across the literature.
While terms such as DARVO have gained cultural visibility, their prevalence as a social or media trend does not equate to a dominant, biologically grounded, or statistically typical response to rape. The quantitative literature more consistently associates post-assault reactions with disgust, timely reporting or accusation, and the absence of ongoing friendly contact with the perpetrator.
 
Every ambulance chasing lolwyer will try to use DARVO denial excuses, but the reality is the percentage is so small that the tally of lawsuits filed using denial and DARVO excuses by lolwyer Thomas alone is so astronomically impossible based on the studies he himself likely quoted. Marginal, fractional, only a single digit or less, percentage of rape victims enter the denial stage immediately.
 
In the vast majority of the studies on the topic of rape trauma and behavior The majority recognized they were raped and this is attributed to: family stability, morals and ethics, financially sound (attorneys, medical, etc are a cost that prohibits many victims of rape from reporting)... in short if you are raised in a wealthy stable home you are more likely (indeed almost 98% likely) to recognize you have been raped and will act to report it immediately.
 
"Common knowledge" is almost always incorrect. Our experts are finalizing their findings for a future blog post.
 
 
We will publish the full report prepared by the assembled team as soon as it is complete.
“Debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open.”

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 (1964). Majority opinion.
FoxNewsVideo.mp4

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #4876
Awesome, looking forward to it. Her lawyer is harping on about that fawning shit, and that she was drunk, but avoids mentioning other criteria for consent and rape. But i think the idea is to prep the civil court to be more lenient in their interpretations rather than to prove rape in a criminal case
Anonymous #4855
Order a card, if it doesnt arrive sue the bimbo whore.
QUOTED COMMENTAnonymous2026-11-08 05:23
https://lucile.design/
View original comment
Anonymous #4846
Lucy Craig's lolwyer continues his fake ambulance chasing.
 
He has time to speak to the media, but not enough time to respond to the motion to dismiss.
7KRqGDL2i4solhh9.mp4
Anonymous #4839
Gfihudwgfyehjwowjifwhu fuehiqokewwfueiweqijwihrwu ifwiqdjwrhwijwijwirhwu lucycraig.blog

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4841
This guy is speaking in tongues, he is so inspired!
Anonymous #4838
Could ask her where to score ket on campus 🤣
QUOTED COMMENTAnonymous2026-11-07 01:06
Luc Craig listed her cell and email as contact information on her alternative Instagram account.
Comment attachment by Anonymous
View original comment
Anonymous #4837
That ai comment really unnerved me! Think about it, gentlemen (and any ladies who arent really gentlemen). What if Lucille H Craig plays out a rape fantasy with AI? Can she sue grok? (lets face it, only elon would remove those gaurdrails)? What if she says she is 14, will the AI then be a pedophile? If she fingers herself, is that fawning? Should AI insist she cuts her finger nails before masturbation to be safe? What if the ai orders her to snort ket of the mouse? Generative AI is only 3 or 4 years old, can it consent to a rape fantasy? Jesus! The flood gates are open, and the courts are not ready!