THE RECORD · THE ARGUMENT · THE RESPONSE

Who Is
Jane Doe
Really?

Evidence. Due process. Competing narratives. The record deserves scrutiny.

WHY THIS EXISTS

Controversial cases still require evidence, process, and room for dissent.

This site is built to present opposition, documentary material, competing interpretations, and public discussion without treating allegations as adjudicated facts. Court records, attributed reporting, editorial argument, and reader comments are labeled as different kinds of material.

REPORTING CREDIT

Reporting that helped frame the public questions

The links below are credited to Richard Luthmann / NY News Press. Linking or discussing them does not convert their assertions into findings of fact.

LATEST

Articles & analysis

PUBLIC RECORD

Documents should be inspectable, searchable, and quotable in context.

Every public Library item gets a dedicated page. PDFs are rendered responsively, OCR is searchable, video/audio transcripts are timestamped, and clicking a transcript segment jumps the media to that point.

Browse library

New docket entries · last 24 hours

Loading recent docket filings…

DISCUSSION

Topics controlled by the administrators; comments controlled by their authors.

A Place For Memes
This discussion forums is for all your Lucy Craig, Cornell 7, memes. We want to have the definitive collection of meme art about Lucy Craig.

Big Tish James
Should Big Tish James be involved in the investigation and prosecution of the Cornell 7?

Can a woman consent to sex if she is voluntarily intoxicated?
Lucy Craig engaged in voluntary consumption of alcohol and illegal substances. Is she capable of consent? And if not, are the men, who were also drinking and consuming illegal substances, according to public reporting, capable of consent? Can they claim that they were raped by Lucy Craig?

Did Lucy Craig Rape Those Drunken Boys?
Her texts say she was not drunk. The bar says she was not drunk. The boys were drunk. Did Lucy Craig (AKA "JANE DOE") rape those boys? Leave a comment with your opinion.

Discuss: Should Lucy Craig Sue Thomas Guiffra?
Thomas Guiffra's famefag attention seeking, publicity stunts have backfired. It is now known that he was leaking records related to the case (the poorly redacted afformation in support of proceeding as Jame Doe was only in possession of the person who filed it). He named a U.S. Active Service Marine, lied about a swat event, filed a fake DMCA in bad faith to this blog, named an incorrect person as a defendant, misrepresents New York's dram shop liability laws against Moonies, and named an entity that doesn't actually exists on paper. His hope was, similar to the Comb's cases, to throw shit against the wall, leak favorable documents, cancel anyone who speaks against his client, and sway the public sympathy. That backfired, with help from LucyCraog.blog. As her case becomes a comedy of errors, we ask you, should Lucile H. Craig sue Thomas Guiffra and his firm for malpractice?

Freedom of Speech
We do not care about your feelings, we do care about freedom of speech. Share and post any legal speech you want. Send us your images, videos, text messages, voice recordings or any other related material for immediate publication without censorship.

THE LATEST DISCUSSION

Latest comments

Loading latest comments…

PUBLIC DISCUSSION

Comments & replies

No account is required. Comment anonymously, or sign in with a pseudonymous account if you want to manage your comments later. Comments are user speech, not editorial findings.

Posting anonymously — no login required.
Optional: sign in or create a pseudonymous username to edit/delete your comments later.
@janedoe1 #3734
WhackADoodles screaming on Vegas rooftop in support of Lucy Craig.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #3762
Repeal the 19th already.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #3746
sounds like a celebration

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

@janedoe1 #3735
At least half these bitches are virgins, and probably > 20% are visiting this site leaving comments.
Comment attachment by janedoe1
Anonymous #3733
William Smith Craig (Daddy): Nuclear Imaging Management Corporation is a U.S.-based medical services company specializing in contract nuclear medicine, mobile diagnostic imaging, radiopharmacy support, and clinical staffing. Also owns Ws Craig IV, LLC registered to their home address in Birmingham, Alabama. And drives a Prius
Judy Mathis Craig (Mommy)
Lucile H. Craig (Train)
John Michael Craig
Harriett Anne Craig
Ronald David Craig
David Allen Craig (Uncle maybe)

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3779
What are you hoping to accomplish with this? What’s your name? How about you next…

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3838
They only have their skank firecrotch daughter to blame for this. Shoulda kept her lips shut -- BOTH pairs!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3827
#IamLucyCraig!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3748
I wonder what the parents and family think of her case... I know what they will say, but there must be shame there.. Also victims of her choices

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3751
They are proud she drew the line at no anal.
Anonymous #3732
Follow up Question
 
If a "victim's" perspective and story can change over time, and that changed story can be the basis for a lawsuit / criminal charges, then isn't it reasonable to doubt people's capacity to understand their experience and participation in real time?
 
In other words, doesn't this case discredit women's decision making ability, and that ultimately, women need to be protected from themselves?
@janedoe1 #3731
Rally attendees write letters to Jane Doe on Oct. 13 in Ithaca, New York. Event organizers said they have collected over 11,000 letters.
Comment attachment by janedoe1

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #3826
Weve written her more than that!
Anonymous #3730
Follow up question:
 
Can a rape victims perspective of their sexual encounter change or time?
 
Can their perspective change even if they “participated“ in the sexual encounter at the time?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3763
I would say yes especially if they were coerced into the activity or underaged.
 
I wouldn't call it coercion if they could say no tho, I think coercion has to involve actual emotional blackmail or threats of some sort.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3767
coercion for sex is not rape. eg “have sex with me or I’ll not hire you” This is not rape but prostitution.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous #3770
Coercion for sex can be rape, but where coercion starts and ends is a gray area and should be looked at by legal professionals, not a random person claiming victimhood based on their personal opinion.
 
"have sex with me or I'll leave/cheat on you" can be emotional blackmail, whether it's said by a man or a woman. Women do that too and it's manipulative and abusive. It's very different from addressing issues in the relationship, like withholding sex or not having enough for your partners preferences.
 
"Have sex with me or I will fire you" is less of a gray area than “have sex with me or I’ll not hire you” given a boss and an employee have a power dynamic and this is clearly a threat based on personal choices that have nothing to do with the job.
 
Basically if you can't say no or there's something being held over your head it's coercion, if you can say no and it's respected (like Lucy Craig) it's not rape. If consent isn't freely given it's not consent, if it's a transaction or you can refuse it's consent.
Anonymous #3728
Serious question for Jane Doe defenders:
 
Can a man be raped by a woman?
@janedoe1 #3724
You can now ride the Train Doe in the comment and article reactions.
Comment attachment by janedoe1
Anonymous #3718
Lucy “ That's the first time I had ever heard the narrative change that I wasn't a whore and that I was assaulted”
 
Case closed.
Anonymous #3717
Daddy's little slut is all grown up
Comment attachment by Anonymous
@janedoe1 edited #3709
Are we even sure "she" is not a "he" now? Have been been misgendering this whole time?
I finally agree that in some instances is may indeed be improper to assume pronouns. I mean, this could be a drag queen dude.
Comment attachment by janedoe1
Comment attachment by janedoe1

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

@janedoe1 #3710
ahem
Comment attachment by janedoe1

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 2

Anonymous #3723
She claims to be bisexual, but only does guys, does self harm (just enough to count), talks about how empathetic and open minded she is, claims obscure diseases, doesnt take accountability, can rewrite history in her mind, talks about herself all the time, thinks everyone loves her... This is hystrionic personality disorder to a fucking t. Its all attention seeking, no real emotions under any of it except when she cried after her reputation was ruined because she couldnt spin it at that point

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 2

@janedoe1 #3711
This dude identifies as a train conductor.
Comment attachment by janedoe1

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 3

Anonymous #3837
Maybe she was starting her Testosterone injections and couldn't control her sex drive? Maybe she shoukd sue big pharma? Can add zeros to the asking amount!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous #3839
The Cornell 7 lawyers should subpoena Lucy Craig for "any and all medications she ingested during October 2024"

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 3

Anonymous #3719
Transitioning

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 3

Anonymous #3712
She strong asf
Anonymous #3675
It was cool to be a militant lesbian 30 years ago, now you are supposed to have gotten your heads around your sexuality/realised there is more to life (especially other peoples lives) your poon and who you wish would fuck it
Anonymous #3669
I think I have the aha moment now.
Anonymous #3667
Almost every discussion about this goes like this:
"But she's a victim she said so!"
"She gave explicit consent and every time she said no it was respected"
"But she was intoxicated! She says based on her slurred words they should have known and backed off!"
"She says she had sex with a guy who was passing out who later claimed SA and a guy who was throwing up"
"But....... What about the snap chat messages"
"Yeah that was really disrespectful, but it doesn't show rape if contextually she was down to have sex with a bunch of guys and they were willing to hear no"
"But no girl would agree to that!"
"She said her body her choice and she's really open minded and that sex is changing"
"INCEL RAPE APOLOGIST!!!"

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3668
Gold. This should be pinned.
Anonymous #3652
Found a song for her. Credit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPeN-ttvaME

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3694
HFS! Stunning! I wasn't expecting that!
"Snorted the dick, Heavy and mean, three cars deep, thats the routine!"
Jokes aside, this is a work of serious talent.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe1 #3657
Fucking hilarious!!!! Train Hoe!
@janedoe1 #3648
As always, we appreciate the continued, unfiltered, uncensored, un-moderated discussion.
 
We have added several new features, small and large.
  • A docket mirror that transfers the documents here, automatically and preserves them, no matter what happens later -sealed, post-filing redactions, etc. You can find the docket and entries documents from the menu "View docket".
  • Expanding on the docket, we have made a slight adjustment to the "Public Records" section of the home page, where it will now show the latest (previous 24hr) docket entries for quick review.
  • Also on the landing page, we have the Most recent 10 comments and added a second tab for trending comments. The math is simple, it counts every reaction and every reply, to the top OP as a single point then adds them all up. Reply comment reactions are also calculated at the same 1 point per.
  • We also fixed the mobile viewing for library items so that the screen doesn't get messy on mobile.
  • On the technical side, we have a small laptop designated as a fall back in case there is any future attacks on this site. It will automatically switch to the fallback laptop if Lucy Server fails for any reason.
 
For transparency purposes, we have determined that ONE comment was to be hidden. The comment was an so called reporter who claimed he was a "sponsor" of this blog and asked that people follow his LinkedIn profile. We did not know who he is, certainly he was not a "sponsor" or in any way associated with the site, and he did not appear to have any other contributions, except one other post where he again said his name and that he "likes this site a lot" (paraphrasing) -this comment remains visible somewhere in the comment section.
 
We have been floored by the discussion, engagement, communication, and dialog in the comment sections. We read all the comments, take note, follow the discussions, and keep an open mind regardless of the commenter's perceived position. The administrators want to consume information, not dismiss or censor it.
 
We continue to ask for your ideas for updates, features, and general style even. Leave your thoughts below.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #3664
Will you guys add notifications for comment replies?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3676
That is very difficult for anonymous commenting. If you have an anonymous comment account (username) there is a comment table thst will allow you navigate easier between your own comments. In both, we have no way to truely notify you, as we are allowing an entirely free and anonymous discussion without access to your phone systems, your email, or compromising your identity in any way like collecting email or metadata, (we designed this to protect anonymous speech, even under duress, or legal threat we have nothing to produce that is not public already).
Good idea, and I do not want to dismiss it outward. I will consider more all the potentials ways to make this idea happen. If anyone has any suggestions let us know.
Anonymous #3646
LOL at all the mad feminists now that the truth has come out . . .
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3725
Imagine if one of them said, "after reading her statement, i have my doubts"? Just one! Anywhere in the world... You may say im a dreamer...

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3727
Luckily, we only need 1 in 12 to respond that way--then the jury hangs.
Anonymous #3622
this whole site is fucking sick. it IS. all. men.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3714
Shut up cunt

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3647
The truth sounds like "hate" "toxic masculinity" and "racism" to those that hate the truth.
No one is safe from ACCOUNTABILITY. Yall wanted equality, well now you have it. Enjoy equal accountability.
And this whole thing is all because she got mad she wasnt invited to some random frat party.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3641
I'm a woman and I'm a victim. Don't forget us.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3715
This you?
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3695
No one here, however vulgar, thinks rape is okay or wants to blame victims (all men are frat boys, not all men are rapists). What you see here is a reaction to a sense of horror at someone making THAT statement now says she was raped, the media crucifying these guys because it sells copy, and dissenting opinions being stifled. You probably get that already, and didn't need my two cents worth, but had to say something.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3642
Welcome.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3633
Says who?
It supports rape victims, like the 2 men in the first threesome that were too inebriated and drugged up to properly give consent.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3673
You are just so hormonal, you cant see its a gag / red cape / serious point about consent when intoxicated.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous #3726
You can’t see that the argument can go both ways.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3631
Cry harder bitch, were not gonna let that skank railroad innocent guys

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe1 #3630
It is okay if you are lesbian. You are welcome here.
@janedoe1 #3609
UPDATE: New Feature:
 
Due to documents getting removed from the public docket and threats of documents getting sealed after first being placed on the record, we have created a system to mirror the docket. It transfers the documents to our own library immediately, and then later scans will determine if the entry was updated, and then creates a NEW section for any modifications -as opposed to editing the current-so that all versions of the document are archived forever.
 
This way, the moment the document is on the public record, it transfers to us, and no further action, modification, or sealing, will remove the document from our servers. The lolwyers and judge better make sure every document is perfectly redacted prior to filing, because we will get a copy immediately and automatically now.
 
You can access the full mirrored docket: and our preservation of the PDF records, as well as search the docket, and all content of the PDFs by keywords within the PDF or docket metadata from the "View docket" menu item. All PDFs also create a sharable library media page with the standard metadata, comment section, etc.
 
LucyCraig.blog
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #3615
Important. The slut-supporters are gonna memory hole more and more to prevent exculpatory facts from remaining in the public domain. #1984

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

@janedoe1 #3619
Once the milk is spilled, there is no cleaning it up and putting it back in the jar.
This new feature collects the spilt milk and preserves it forever. No future sealing, redaction, modification, or deletion, will remove the entry from our blog. It remains forever in the library and on the docket mirror.
Anonymous #3601
This story has totally gone cold in the MSM.
The only outlet reporting anything new is TMZ.
 
Just shows how most people question the accusers credibility.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3603
Ya, looks like the media's leaving the Lucy Craig train and switching tracks to the less skanky "victim" at University of Chicago

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3602
Wrong. Google Cornell and check news. According to Washington Post one of the boys is in a Florida college

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #3604
So the media doxxed another guy? Yawn
Anonymous #3598
LOL Black feminists are not aboard the "yt cis" Lucy Craig train
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3600
Tired of those nonsense

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #3599
The blue haired whackadoodles meet the BLM whackadoodles.