Lucy Craig is Jane Doe - 100% Verified logo Lucy Craig is Jane Doe - 100% Verified
THE RECORD · THE ARGUMENT · THE RESPONSE

Who Is
Jane Doe
Really?

Evidence. Due process. Competing narratives. The record deserves scrutiny.

Open the evidence libraryRead the argumentJoin the discussion
✍ Sign the petition
WHY THIS EXISTS

Controversial cases still require evidence, process, and room for dissent.

This site is built to present opposition, documentary material, competing interpretations, and public discussion without treating allegations as adjudicated facts. Court records, attributed reporting, editorial argument, and reader comments are labeled as different kinds of material.

REPORTING CREDIT

Reporting that helped frame the public questions

The links below are credited to Richard Luthmann / NY News Press. Linking or discussing them does not convert their assertions into findings of fact.

Richard Luthmann — Cornell Seven: Evidence Before Election Theater Psy-Op ↗Richard Luthmann — BREAKING: Cornell Seven Accuser Unmasked ↗NY News Press — Cornell Seven Accuser Unmasked ↗NY News Press — Cornell Seven Evidence ↗
LATEST

Articles & analysis

Rice Purity Quiz

Take the Rice Purity Quiz As If You Were Lucy Craig

We’ve recreated the 100-question Rice Purity Test, allowing you to explore it through the lens of the publicly available records, police reports, court...

2026-11-10Analysis

Rice Purity, Mom Lore, and Lucy Craig

One of the most revealing messages in the Cornell Seven controversy is also one of the most casually written. Understanding two pieces of Gen Z slang helps...

2026-11-08ARTICLE

Reproduction of Key Text Messages

Read the text exchanges reproduced here.

2026-11-08ARTICLE

The 20-Year Loophole?

Two recent court decisions, an expired ordinary filing deadline, questionable reliance on criminal statutes, and a conspicuously missing fifth cause of...

2026-11-05Legal Commentary

Lucy Craig Wants Another 60 Days. The Court Should Say No.

Nearly two years after the alleged events, Lucile H. Craig's attorneys want to delay Diego Sarabia's motion to dismiss—while defending a complaint that...

2026-11-05Opinion

BREAKING: Jacqueline Kelly, the Cornell Graduate Who Must Now Prove She Can Investigate Cornell

Letitia James has hired an outside lawyer to lead the Cornell 7 investigation. Her selection raises a rather inconvenient question: when does independence...

2026-11-04
PUBLIC RECORD

Documents should be inspectable, searchable, and quotable in context.

Every public Library item gets a dedicated page. PDFs are rendered responsively, OCR is searchable, video/audio transcripts are timestamped, and clicking a transcript segment jumps the media to that point.

Browse library

New docket entries · last 24 hours

Loading recent docket filings…

DISCUSSION

Topics controlled by the administrators; comments controlled by their authors.

A Place For Memes
This discussion forums is for all your Lucy Craig, Cornell 7, memes. We want to have the definitive collection of meme art about Lucy Craig.

Big Tish James
Should Big Tish James be involved in the investigation and prosecution of the Cornell 7?

Can a woman consent to sex if she is voluntarily intoxicated?
Lucy Craig engaged in voluntary consumption of alcohol and illegal substances. Is she capable of consent? And if not, are the men, who were also drinking and consuming illegal substances, according to public reporting, capable of consent? Can they claim that they were raped by Lucy Craig?

Did Lucy Craig Rape Those Drunken Boys?
Her texts say she was not drunk. The bar says she was not drunk. The boys were drunk. Did Lucy Craig (AKA "JANE DOE") rape those boys? Leave a comment with your opinion.

Discuss: Should Lucy Craig Sue Thomas Guiffra?
Thomas Guiffra's famefag attention seeking, publicity stunts have backfired. It is now known that he was leaking records related to the case (the poorly redacted afformation in support of proceeding as Jame Doe was only in possession of the person who filed it). He named a U.S. Active Service Marine, lied about a swat event, filed a fake DMCA in bad faith to this blog, named an incorrect person as a defendant, misrepresents New York's dram shop liability laws against Moonies, and named an entity that doesn't actually exists on paper. His hope was, similar to the Comb's cases, to throw shit against the wall, leak favorable documents, cancel anyone who speaks against his client, and sway the public sympathy. That backfired, with help from LucyCraog.blog. As her case becomes a comedy of errors, we ask you, should Lucile H. Craig sue Thomas Guiffra and his firm for malpractice?

Freedom of Speech
We do not care about your feelings, we do care about freedom of speech. Share and post any legal speech you want. Send us your images, videos, text messages, voice recordings or any other related material for immediate publication without censorship.

THE LATEST DISCUSSION

Latest comments

Loading latest comments…

PUBLIC DISCUSSION

Comments & replies

No account is required. Comment anonymously, or sign in with a pseudonymous account if you want to manage your comments later. Comments are user speech, not editorial findings.

Posting anonymously — no login required.
Optional: sign in or create a pseudonymous username to edit/delete your comments later.
Anonymous #4833
Cornell's toothless "no confidence" vote against the President of the University.
oU_92eMNGxzRaGbd.mp4

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4835
Its funny how everyone is super confident when things go well, then has no confidence when things go wrong... Even though the senate is effectively saying they failed too. (senate sets policy, management implements, senate monitors... Senate failed twice!). Bit of a face saving exercise, but people who feel they are nonexecutive directors but not really responsible... If management goes, the senate needs to go, they wanted to put their membership on resumes and talk a good game, but lacked the commitment and intellectual integrity to do what is obviously expected of them
Anonymous #4832
Luc Craig listed her cell and email as contact information on her alternative Instagram account.
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4850
https://lucile.design/

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4854
I'm ordering a card: CONGRATULATIONS ON YOUR ABORTION! 😄

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4852
Jesus Christ... No way this girl had a side hustle from when she was still in highschool, unless it was sucking cock for cash

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4840
She calls herself a writer? Don't you have to have written something for that? Maybe she is busy writting her memoir, I am sure she feels like a martyr with so much to say

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4842
The book already has a cover...
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4836
Wow! Can we send her the reasons why her lawyer is killing her reputation right now? Thats not harassment, thats being helpful
Anonymous #4822
Why do you guys use AI if you're serious about this?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4834
This statement should not be taken at face value! Its pointing out how you can drive attitudes in the public through the ms, which is sensationalist! (Im right, arent i guru?).

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4830
Who gives a flying fuck?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4829
Lucys lawyer is an AI, we need to fight them on an equal footing

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe1 edited #4828
Would you prefer if we used WordPress and then subject ourselves to the whims of the speech police?
 
What is the difference between an AI assisted coded website in 2026 and a shit drag and click WordPress template site of 2020?
 
This site is undefeated by any attempts to censor, attack, hack, or otherwise cancel with frivilous reports to service providers.
 
Also, we set this up in real time, have over 12,000,000 page views, the entire catalog of records that are currently available, memes, games, comments, articles that analisys the real issues and not just fluff for the narrative pumped by a whore.
 
So, AI or not, this site is far more valuable as an informational tool than any social media platform. And lets face it, all social media platforms are now AI as well. So, deal with it. It is 2026, not 2020.
 
  • Hosting cost: 0$
  • Server cost: 0$
  • Software cost: 0$
 
  • Our expenses: 0$
  • AI subscriptions: (we have about 20 plus variations of AI services for work so 0$ additional cost)
 
  • WordPress: 150$ a year
Limitations on speech, design, flexibility, dynamic content (like comments) control and ownership of data -you ever try to host 1000 files on WordPress or related service then try to take them down to end your subscription? Privacy limitations, you comments here have no meta attached, if you comment on any WordPress site the metadata would be connected to you...
 
So, again, AI or not, this is the future of websites and the future of free speech -self hosted, privacy focused, sites that are not subject to the whims of others. Continue to pay for your WordPress subscription.
“Debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open.”

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 (1964). Majority opinion.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4827
What the prob in using AI? This is a website not a killer-of-civilians drone.
Anonymous #4817
WATCH: attorney for Lopes discusses morality, consent, and his clients moral tripitude.
DcxEWbaq5dm_rKQd.mp4
@janedoe1 edited #4814
Bender Lucy Craig attempts to circumvent the statute of limitations with unicorns and imaginary circumstances. Certainly by now she should be considering suing her pathetic and worthless lolwyers.
 
“Debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open.”

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 (1964). Majority opinion.
Lucy Craig On Trial
@janedoe1 #4804
BREAKING: Jacqueline Kelly, the Cornell Graduate Who Must Now Prove She Can Investigate Cornell
New York Attorney General Letitia James has found her new face for the Cornell 7
 
“Debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open.”

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 (1964). Majority opinion.
Jacqueline Kelly
Anonymous #4792
Dems win! Well done, America! Thats a huge affirmation of democracyHowever you feel about Lucy, transgender, etc, that psycho needs to go. Demand centrist policies, and MAGA

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe1 edited #4793
Please keep politics off this page.
 
Take that shit to your Facebook, Instagram, BlueSky or wherever you spew political nonsense. Many may or may not agree with you. To me, it doesn't matter here.
 
Just because you add the words "Lucy" in the sentence doesn't keep it on topic.
 
If you want to discuss politics, keep it within the realm of the Lucy Craig / Cornell 7 topics. For example, speculate or post about Tish James using this case as a spring board for free publicity just before the midterms, as mentioned in Lee's filings in Tompkins County (available on the docket page).
 
But, this is not a political springboard for you to just spew blah blah blah about your political position just because it is a free-speech platform. Your politics do not matter to me, or probably anyone else here. This is, pure and simple, to balance a conversation about Lucy Craig because her lolwyers decided that only one side of the conversation should be heard.
 
Post your celebratory political posts on BlueSky or wherever politics discussion controls everything you see, read, and manipulate your mind.
 
Please stay on topic here.
 
Thank you.
“Debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open.”

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 (1964). Majority opinion.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 2

Anonymous #4795
I will consider it, but in the spirit of free speech, get fucked. There has been a shit load of linking lucy to liberal conspiracies, etc and you havent commented, so be consistent or look like a hypocrite.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous #4798
Fair enough, stick to the conspiracies thay connect Lucy to politics, tbat is appropriate, blanket unrelated politics is irrelevent here.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous #4802
Your mothers giant strapon is the reason Lucy is scared of anal. Your bitch mother basically cock blocked Matthew Ingalls.
 
Now ive linked your slattern mom to lucy. Can you see how spurious the link is? Using one to lash out at another?
 
Now you are a slightly more educated human being! unless that was too still too subtle?
 
That said, i must apologise, just because your mother is a huge bulll dyke with Aids, doesnt mean she'd fuck Lucy, that was uncalled for.
Anonymous #4787
196 (up from 190 yesterday).
Comment attachment by Anonymous
Comment attachment by Anonymous
QUOTED COMMENT@janedoe12026-11-03 01:05
Lucy Craig is definitively online and watching. Her IG numbers continue to fluctuate daily. Following numbers increased from 189 to 190 in just a few hours. Also, it looks like the newest follower is "school if life" of some retarded IG memes about life affirmations like "don't …
Expand quoted comment
Lucy Craig is definitively online and watching. Her IG numbers continue to fluctuate daily. Following numbers increased from 189 to 190 in just a few hours. Also, it looks like the newest follower is "school if life" of some retarded IG memes about life affirmations like "don't do drugs", " study hard and get a good job" and so on. She is definitively watching. I really hope she is a fan of this site, where her worthless, pathetic, famefag, lolwyers, cannot suppress, censor, dox, or cancel.
Comment attachment by janedoe1
View original comment
Anonymous #4786
Sam doxxes the defendants but not Lucy Craig. If he was against violence why name names in the same article? Look, no one cares if the names are named. This site publishes everything and supports the broadest exercise of free speech, but the entire premise od this f@ggot's article is that you should get "meaner" in real life and not comment online -implication being violence?
 
Maybe Sam is just a f@ggot who wishes he could have participated in the gangbang of Lucy Train Doe Craig.
 
 
  • p.s. he/they pronouns. I cannot even figure out what fucking gender this retard is.
Comment attachment by Anonymous
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4790
Please post the link.... On a related note, i was trolling Lucy on instagram... That place is victim central! Worse than that, its exactly this, people calling for violence in response to issues like racism (as if violent black people isnt a racist trope) or sexual assault (Johnny Depp would be dickless today!) . A childs mentality - feeling like a gangster because you dream about cutting penises off. But its everywhere! I'm going to delete that shit soon, just too depressing to see the stupid and naive get such a loud voice. if you havent been down that rabbithole, stay away, its not healthy

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4791
https://unewsonline.com/2026/11/calling-for-violence-against-the-cornell-rapists-does-not-make-you-a-better-person/
Anonymous #4779
Cornell University Lifts Ban on Cornell Fraternity Parties at Off-Campus Annexes -the primary locarion where the parties occurred, and where the original ban of Oct. 16, targeted.
 
Sanity might be restoring due to the free speech of this platform setting the record straight.
Comment attachment by Anonymous
QUOTED COMMENTAnonymous2026-10-14 00:20
Cornell bans all frat parties. https://apnews.com/article/cornell-rape-investigation-frat-party-ban-686aaca2c81878f8cd771a0e3bdf7fa4
Comment attachment by Anonymous
View original comment

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4784
Executives are always great until there is a real challenge, then they spin out completely

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe1 #4782
“Debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open.”

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 (1964). Majority opinion.
Cornell Annex Ban
@janedoe1 #4777
Good morning,
 
We are taking a read of the commenters' thoughts.
 
Should we change the "Anonymous" label for anonymous comments from "Anonymous" to "Jane Doe"? Every anonymous comment will be posted by "Jane Doe".
 
Please let us know.
“One man's vulgarity is another's lyric.”

Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15, 25 (1971). Majority opinion.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #4780
Maybe john doe?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4785
Maybe something gender-neutral, like J. Doe?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous #4788
Or L. Craig?
Anonymous #4772
Worth reading.
 
https://nypost.com/2026/11/02/opinion/we-challenged-campus-dogma-on-cornell-7-and-exposed-columbias-free-speech-hypocrisy/
 
Thank you admins.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4773
Thanks for this! Lucy's gangbang is almost trivial compared to the issue of censorship and freespeech! I'm amazed that a student paper would be attacked like that, you'd think students and staff would be more free thinking or more able to engage with the story than just sending hate mail. I almost feel like there is only so much freedom the world can handle, after that, we start cutting freedoms elsewhere. The people slut-shaming Lucy a year ago are the same ones protesting now, just completely performative with no real social objective, just personal point-scoring, which hurts gender relations without helping real victims in the least.
Anonymous #4771
Just want to say that I absolutely love you guys for this site and for speaking the truth. The feminists and the kikes want to silence anyone who speaks the truth against them, but they shall not prevail. This site is a major win for humanity. Definitely find ways to clone this, back it up everywhere. You guys rock
Anonymous #4770
What this case shows is a lack of education. Girls and boys are being told that "no means no", and spouting absolute positions without considering how this might play out in real life. They aren't being told:
 
  • Getting drunk or high doesn't mean you lack capacity to give consent (so having a beer doesn't mean you can now jump on the rape wagon). You have to be totally fucking out of it to the point where you don't understand that "do you want to have a threesome" means "do you want to have actual for-real sex with two guys". You can't have a clear memory of how excited your were that maybe that means the boys are gay and claim you were incapacitated. Intoxication is not the same as incapacitation - most of us have never been incapacitated because we aren't fucking wreckless.
  • Being drugged without your knowledge/consent invalidates consent, binge drinking on your own to catch up with your sorority sisters is voluntary. If its voluntary, you have to show incapacity.
  • There is a difference between consent and submission (e.g. if you are nagged and give in, its "submission", but you still have to have done more than say "I'm tired", "are you serious", "You're a bad boy, you know that", "okay spit roast me".) Nagging is also not the same as intimidating or harming and will carry less weight.
 
And here is the one that people still aren't getting:
 
  • Non-consensual sex is not the same as rape! Rape requires that the person could reasonably have known you were not consenting. So flexing, snorting ket aggressively, sucking dicks and having nice chats with the guys between fucks all kind of suggest you are good to go! When someone walks in the room and says "Hey miss, are you okay?" and she says yes (instead of saying I feel a bit tired, maybe I should go home) it is game on.
 
  • If the boys were drunk and high, they will not be as quick to read her mind or subtle indicators - this matters.
 
If girls and boys aren't taught this they are being failed by the system, their schools, their parents, and tik tok feminists, but these definitions and criteria are completely logical and reasonable when interpretting such a situation.
@janedoe1 #4751
Lucy Craig is definitively online and watching.
Her IG numbers continue to fluctuate daily. Following numbers increased from 189 to 190 in just a few hours. Also, it looks like the newest follower is "school if life" of some retarded IG memes about life affirmations like "don't do drugs", " study hard and get a good job" and so on.
She is definitively watching. I really hope she is a fan of this site, where her worthless, pathetic, famefag, lolwyers, cannot suppress, censor, dox, or cancel.
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.
Comment attachment by janedoe1
QUOTED COMMENTAnonymous2026-11-02 05:13
Why is Lucy Craig deleted evidence? From 129 - 115.
Comment attachment by AnonymousComment attachment by Anonymous
View original comment

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #4764
Hi Lucy! Keep training!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4826
to create more victims? Hell No!

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous #4759
Do we have her original following list? I suspect its been shaoed now to fit her story
Anonymous #4745
i can’t wrap my head around the fact her statement or one of them was “my thought was that if i took more ketamine & passed out and they had sex with me while i was unconscious than i could have them charged from rape”. i don’t get it. also it doesn’t make sense to sue her sorority as well? like? she’s a 20 year old junior? this isn’t middle/high school. you aren’t going to be supervised 24/7. the story just doesn’t add up.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4760
Thats an incredibly cold and calculating thing to think whem you are apparently incapacitated. Her inner monologue that she put in the statement is basically why there will never be criminal charges. There is no psychological trauma response which covers the thoughts she expresses... Its not fawning to go to a police station to lay a charge of rape and then say shit like that, it is just retardation, and it shows what we keep saying here, she was easily swayed by her roommate to lash out, on the incorrect premise that voluntary intoxication = incapacity. If she had a lawyer explain the terms then, her statement would have been very different.
Anonymous #4744
I was listening to an interview with her lawyer (trying to get a sample to clone his voice... Shits and giggles) anyway that cunt paints her as fuckin heidi, tending sheep in some remote fucking farming village, from a poor family, dreaming of studying at cornell. Dreaming of studying hotel admin? Do me a fucking favour! Dreaming of getting high and fucking other students more like it, maybe launching a channel on cankles and big shoulders (if you get huge enough, your ankles look thin! Clever!). Rich girl in the richest country in the world, from a pretty big town, with a prestigious highschool education, doing a mickey mouse degree to pad her resume to go work in dads business as a shitty secretary. Scum representing trash.
Anonymous #4742
NYTimes article: paywall removed...
 
https://archive.is/20261102043748/https://www.nytimes.com/2026/11/01/us/take-back-the-night-protests-sexual-violence.html

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4743
Ja, protesting.. Not so much neighbourhood watches, patrols, education, donations, support, more performative bullshit. At least you guys are better than the cunts her - we burn down schools because the school has a pit latrine

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4746
She should protest in the gayborhood
Anonymous #4737
If Lucy told the truth, what woukd she have to do as part of her apology to convince you that she has learnt her lesson and is really sincere?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4740
Free membership to her OF page...

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4763
By the time thats up and running, she will have a penis/mutilated tube of flesh grafted to her

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous #4767
I'm surprised that Lucy Craig doesn't have a pic of her dildo collection on her Insta...

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous #4769
There is one, its under "Boyf"
Anonymous #4725
Why is Lucy Craig deleted evidence?
From 129 - 115.
Comment attachment by Anonymous
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4732
She deleted who she is following - Probably after Megyn Kelly pointed out she liked "Call her Daddy" which is a show about a chick who got pregnant somewhere during her dozens of threesomes - not a good look for someone claiming not to be a slut. Would be curious to see who she has deleted (nice to see she is still active on-line, maybe googling herself and finding train memes). I hope bukkakenightmare.com refuses to refund her for cancelling her membership

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4825
wtaf! Use protection folks instead of killing embryos/infants/kids!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous #4824
wtaf! Use protection folks instead of killing embryos/infants/kids!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

@janedoe1 edited #4739
We hope ahe is a fan of LucyCraig.blog. 🚆 🚉 🚄 🚋 🚈
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous #4731
looks like the "Meow" folder was deleted... She probably thinks that is part of her transition to being male...