THE RECORD · THE ARGUMENT · THE RESPONSE

Who Is
Jane Doe
Really?

Evidence. Due process. Competing narratives. The record deserves scrutiny.

Open the evidence library Read the argument Join the discussion

WHY THIS EXISTS

Controversial cases still require evidence, process, and room for dissent.

This site is built to present opposition, documentary material, competing interpretations, and public discussion without treating allegations as adjudicated facts. Court records, attributed reporting, editorial argument, and reader comments are labeled as different kinds of material.

REPORTING CREDIT

Reporting that helped frame the public questions

The links below are credited to Richard Luthmann / NY News Press. Linking or discussing them does not convert their assertions into findings of fact.

Richard Luthmann — Cornell Seven: Evidence Before Election Theater Psy-Op ↗Richard Luthmann — BREAKING: Cornell Seven Accuser Unmasked ↗NY News Press — Cornell Seven Accuser Unmasked ↗NY News Press — Cornell Seven Evidence ↗

LATEST

Articles & analysis

Rice Purity Quiz

Take the Rice Purity Quiz As If You Were Lucy Craig

We’ve recreated the 100-question Rice Purity Test, allowing you to explore it through the lens of the publicly available records, police reports, court...

2026-11-10

Analysis

Rice Purity, Mom Lore, and Lucy Craig

One of the most revealing messages in the Cornell Seven controversy is also one of the most casually written. Understanding two pieces of Gen Z slang helps...

2026-11-08

ARTICLE

Reproduction of Key Text Messages

Read the text exchanges reproduced here.

2026-11-08

ARTICLE

The 20-Year Loophole?

Two recent court decisions, an expired ordinary filing deadline, questionable reliance on criminal statutes, and a conspicuously missing fifth cause of...

2026-11-05

Legal Commentary

Lucy Craig Wants Another 60 Days. The Court Should Say No.

Nearly two years after the alleged events, Lucile H. Craig's attorneys want to delay Diego Sarabia's motion to dismiss—while defending a complaint that...

2026-11-05

Opinion

BREAKING: Jacqueline Kelly, the Cornell Graduate Who Must Now Prove She Can Investigate Cornell

Letitia James has hired an outside lawyer to lead the Cornell 7 investigation. Her selection raises a rather inconvenient question: when does independence...

2026-11-04

PUBLIC RECORD

Documents should be inspectable, searchable, and quotable in context.

Every public Library item gets a dedicated page. PDFs are rendered responsively, OCR is searchable, video/audio transcripts are timestamped, and clicking a transcript segment jumps the media to that point.

Browse library

New docket entries · last 24 hours

Loading recent docket filings…

DISCUSSION

Topics controlled by the administrators; comments controlled by their authors.

A Place For Memes
This discussion forums is for all your Lucy Craig, Cornell 7, memes. We want to have the definitive collection of meme art about Lucy Craig.

Big Tish James
Should Big Tish James be involved in the investigation and prosecution of the Cornell 7?

Can a woman consent to sex if she is voluntarily intoxicated?
Lucy Craig engaged in voluntary consumption of alcohol and illegal substances. Is she capable of consent? And if not, are the men, who were also drinking and consuming illegal substances, according to public reporting, capable of consent? Can they claim that they were raped by Lucy Craig?

Did Lucy Craig Rape Those Drunken Boys?
Her texts say she was not drunk. The bar says she was not drunk. The boys were drunk. Did Lucy Craig (AKA "JANE DOE") rape those boys? Leave a comment with your opinion.

Discuss: Should Lucy Craig Sue Thomas Guiffra?
Thomas Guiffra's famefag attention seeking, publicity stunts have backfired. It is now known that he was leaking records related to the case (the poorly redacted afformation in support of proceeding as Jame Doe was only in possession of the person who filed it). He named a U.S. Active Service Marine, lied about a swat event, filed a fake DMCA in bad faith to this blog, named an incorrect person as a defendant, misrepresents New York's dram shop liability laws against Moonies, and named an entity that doesn't actually exists on paper. His hope was, similar to the Comb's cases, to throw shit against the wall, leak favorable documents, cancel anyone who speaks against his client, and sway the public sympathy. That backfired, with help from LucyCraog.blog. As her case becomes a comedy of errors, we ask you, should Lucile H. Craig sue Thomas Guiffra and his firm for malpractice?

Freedom of Speech
We do not care about your feelings, we do care about freedom of speech. Share and post any legal speech you want. Send us your images, videos, text messages, voice recordings or any other related material for immediate publication without censorship.

THE LATEST DISCUSSION

Latest comments

Loading latest comments…

PUBLIC DISCUSSION

Comments & replies

No account is required. Comment anonymously, or sign in with a pseudonymous account if you want to manage your comments later. Comments are user speech, not editorial findings.

Anonymous2026-10-12 00:59 UTC #2701

So, we're not gonna judge the men who were also involved?...

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-12 01:55 UTC #2712

The issue here isn't the consensual fuck fest that occurred. I think we can all agree that everyone who engaged in sexual activity that night was being reckless. Rather, the issue is the damage from the false allegations. There's nothing wrong with being a whore, per se, as I'm all for individual autonomy that doesn't harm others -- "our body, our choice." But being a lying whore? That's a completely different story.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-12 02:35 UTC #2722

It’s just hypocritical for people call her a whore when the men did the same thing.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-12 17:10 UTC #2893

Whores have sex for money. Before the lawsuit she was just another slut like the guys.

Anonymous2026-10-12 00:17 UTC #2686

Everytime man is given power

They know nothing else but to abuse it

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-12 09:02 UTC #2795

Per capita I'd say there are more male leaders, but more bad female leaders. This femcel shit is cringe btw.

Anonymous2026-10-12 00:07 UTC #2681

It's so homoerotic

The way you pray to men

And treat your women

Like a Leviathan

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-12 04:16 UTC #2746

You can openly call us gay if you want, you dont have to hide behind aweful poetry! You will feel like a twat once you read the actual transcripts, and regret it, but at least you wont be able to cry rape, so its all good

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-12 02:14 UTC #2716

You can say thoseboys were gay if you want to, dont be afraid

Anonymous2026-10-12 00:05 UTC #2679

Why do y’all care so much about strangers anyway? Like why would someone spend their time making this website??

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 13:48 UTC #3854

Ask the skanks posting "We are Jane Doe"... we're just meeting tit with tat. Hope that helps xoxo

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-12 15:47 UTC #2878

It's called empathy and standing up for the TRUTH. Maybe you should try it sometimes.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-12 04:22 UTC #2748

Because some people stand up for what's right even when it doesn't affect them personally. Are you really so cynical and amoral that you can't understand that?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-12 03:43 UTC #2738

It's indicative of the decay of our society. Women should not have the power to destroy mens lives by lying about them.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-12 02:23 UTC #2718

Empathy

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-12 02:34 UTC #2721

You all claim empathy but call women sluts.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-12 09:05 UTC #2799

only the slutty ones

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-12 02:45 UTC #2727

she is

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous2026-10-12 02:48 UTC #2729

And not the men who were involved in the same activity?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 5

Anonymous2026-10-12 03:53 UTC #2741

W for men and L for women. It’s been like this forever and always will be. MEN DO NOT WANT HO AS LONG TERM PARTNER.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 6

Anonymous2026-10-12 08:27 UTC #2779

Good thing no woman will ever want you as a partner either way.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 7

Anonymous2026-10-12 14:53 UTC #2859

How do you know that? Your just upset being a slut has consequences in dating. Keep your mouth shut and your legs closed bitch

Anonymous2026-10-11 22:17 UTC #2652

She will probably open an Only Fans if she doesn't have one and probably make millions.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-12 00:05 UTC #2680

So what if she does?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-12 10:09 UTC #2831

I'd repost her content

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-11 22:24 UTC #2654

Who says she doesn’t have one already. Our body our choice asf.

Anonymous2026-10-11 22:03 UTC #2649

Those pushing the rape narrative are probably Lindsey Clancey supporters. There are lots of crazy women out there and their cuck supporters. What they want is complete supremacy. Facts don't matter. Nor does fairness.

On a side note. Don't sleep with whores. The guys were complete morons and disgusting. Only crazy women are whores and are capable of anything. Also there are many diseases out there. It's just not worth it. Have some self respect and self control.

Anonymous2026-10-11 15:56 UTC #2503

This settles the long held belief that the Red heads are hornier than others.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-11 17:13 UTC #2527

Lindsay Lohan is nothing compared to Lucy Craig in the firecrotch department

Anonymous2026-10-11 14:56 UTC #2481

Lucy, you felt ashamed of what you did and sued. Now everyone can read your statement to the police and know what happened in very detail. Do you feel better?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe12026-10-11 15:42 UTC #2497

The full police report, redacted bt the police, not us.

Lucy_Craig_police_report_-_Full_-_Redacted

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-11 15:18 UTC #2486

Yeah, this makes no sense to me. She was already having a good life with a new boyfriend; why bother to file a suit she can't win? She must have much better evidence that we don't know yet? I'd be surprised.

Or is this funded by someone else to make it big, such as a political entity to influence midterm elections? This sounds like a conspiracy theory, but it fits many realities: timed to be before the midterm election, which is strange given this is a 2-year-old case; mainstream media coordinate to tell a one-sided story with a presumption of guilt, which is also strange given the police reports and her messages; this case got political support from the Democratic Party almost immediately...

Can Lucy's lawyer disclose who is funding the lawsuit, and why it's timed to be now?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-11 19:26 UTC #2554

The criminal charges wont stick, but i predict amillion from cornel, and possibly a few hundred k from the fuck buddies in the civil (males 2, 3, 5 and 6 might counter sue if they are brave)

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-11 17:58 UTC #2533

Bingo!! This is exactly what it's about!!!!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-11 14:58 UTC #2482

She sued because she was known as a slut at Cornell. Now the entire COUNTRY knows! LoL

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-12 01:13 UTC #2704

TRUE. This news traveled quickly to the opposite side of the country in Silicon Valley. It's also made its way across seas as my boyfriend in London now knows she's a whore, too.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-12 16:41 UTC #2891

The name "Lucy Craig" will become synonymous with gangbangs, just as "Lewinsky" means blowjob.

Is Urban Dictionary still a thing?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-11 22:40 UTC #2659

Yes

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-12 09:04 UTC #2797

She kinda reminds me of Bella Ramsay

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-11 21:02 UTC #2625

Exactly

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-11 15:14 UTC #2485

Then XXX entered the room and told me to sit on his lap... XXX was not wearing any pants and he was fully erect... I sat on his lap, XXX introduced himself to me and reached out to shake my hand... then he pulled me into him and we began making out... Eventually, XXX and myself would end up on the bed next to the bed where YYY was sleeping and we began to have a threesome.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-11 17:38 UTC #2531

And feminists told us porn is not real lol... this is a scene straight from the porn

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-11 15:09 UTC #2484

Entire world .....and AI will make it forever.

Long past Paris Hilton's BJ homemade videos.

@janedoe12026-10-11 12:07 UTC #2444

Good morning all.

Overnight I tightened up the security and privacy of the comments, added some colors to distinguish the comment threads better, and provided some search options for the long pages of content (library, discussion, articles, comment sections, etc). Finally, I have updated the reactions on comments. Additionally, you can now develope your arguement, position, speech, with exhibits already uploaded, by others or the admins, directly in the comments, or add more media to the library -which will become available for others to use in their comments as well.

We (the admins) get threats, anyone who these speech police think is us, are getting threats, so we have tightened the security and privacy even more to ensure a safe exchange of conversation without fear of retaliation.

In other updates:

We just posted the civil Summons and Complaint, because the court has now sealed it, so we intend to keep it public and published. it is in the library section.

Lucy, the server powering this blog, has been gangbanged by internet traffic for the last week, and it has not affected service of the site at all. in fact, it could scale massively without any noticeable lag. I say that because this site is not dependent on any third party service and will not be coming down -so speak freely, honestly, as you want, without any moderation or censorship from me. That said, I might reply in kind if I agree, disagree with your comment like anyone else, and all of us. But, I will not censor speech because I disagree with it.

The answer to speech you disagree with is more speech, not censorship.

Have fun, make friends, discuss, argue, be polite, be vulgar, be mean, be sensitive, be left, be right, be Jane Doe, be the Defendants. Just have a voice and know that your voice will not be censored here.

Admin1

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

@janedoe12026-10-11 15:40 UTC #2496

Complaint and Summons that is now sealed.

161704_2026_Jane_Doe_v_Cornell_University_Inc_et_al_SUMMONS___COMPLAINT_1

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-11 15:29 UTC #2492

Court ordered spilled milk to be put back in the bottle?

Judges these days....

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-11 12:44 UTC #2466

The court SEALED the complaint?! I thought secret kangaroo courts died with the Soviet Union. Guess not.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-11 12:40 UTC #2465

Thank you for your work on this.

Anonymous2026-10-11 09:27 UTC #2418

Serious question, is Michael Tracey a little bitch for unmasking Jane Doe then deleting the post and whining because he got trolled?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-11 15:01 UTC #2483

Meh, he outed the firecrotch ho Lucy Craig, that's good enough.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-11 13:13 UTC #2468

Some people cannot handle the trolling. Doesn't mean that they are bitches, per se, but they should understand that the trolling is also speech, which is also protected.

Anonymous2026-10-11 09:10 UTC #2410

Please read my new book, "Seven rules for a safe gang bang: lessons from Cornell" #gangbangsafetyawarnessmonth

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-11 09:38 UTC #2421

Rule No.1: buy a go pro

Anonymous2026-10-11 08:39 UTC #2406

im jane kirk nigga. -aimbotfr

Anonymous2026-10-11 08:39 UTC #2405

im jane kirk nigga. -aimbotfr

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-11 09:08 UTC #2409

Are you saying we should start a #IamLucyCraig movement?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-11 09:23 UTC #2416

Great idea

Anonymous2026-10-11 07:44 UTC #2403

Whoever made this blog, I want to congratulate you on the technological skill. You seem to have broken the matrix, at least temporarily.

Im very interested in the technical tools you used for this and how this technology can potentially be used for larger scale anti propaganda, anti brainwashing efforts to rally millions of people around the world to oppose , resist and eventually emiminate the amerikkkan and israhelli regimes. I believe if one can communicate freely without censorship. Millions of people well stand up and say, HELL now, both to American tyranny and jewish imperialism and greed. Millions of angry ethnic and short men around the world have the power to remove the us and jewish greed from the controls if they ever can all wake the fuck up and this uncensorsable communication tech might be key to waking them all up

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-11 09:23 UTC #2415

Great work. Wonder how much effort need to put in nowadays.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-11 09:18 UTC #2412

So its called a website, you have to pay for it... Oh? Thats a deal breaker? Then you are shit oit of luck

Anonymous2026-10-11 07:40 UTC #2402

Stop voting for sharia law

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-11 19:20 UTC #2549

Uncle Adolf was PRO ISLAM, you utter imbecile.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-11 09:25 UTC #2417

How is Muslim related

Anonymous2026-10-11 05:44 UTC #2370

Important question, is there credible evidence that she texted someone during the events? I read this somewhere, but cant find it anymore

Anonymous2026-10-11 02:51 UTC #2340

What you do all think about the Epstein files?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-11 05:29 UTC #2366

Hopefully enough to get you fuckers to vote for trumps impeachment in november

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-11 18:02 UTC #2534

Never

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-11 06:51 UTC #2387

Only Democratic dirty money olligarchs got outed.

Bill Gates got the divorce.

Trump is still your president.

Bill Clinton did nasty things to a female intern in the Whitehouse.

Next!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-11 11:54 UTC #2439

And he had to resign for it dodobird.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous2026-10-11 18:50 UTC #2542

You ignoramus

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous2026-10-11 13:58 UTC #2474

Bill Clinton never resigned you moron. Learn history before talking

Anonymous2026-10-10 22:01 UTC #2244

Image being such a horrible person that you make rapists right a essay as a form of punishment. Stupid mf

lv_7649384334465568014_20260829113529.mp4

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-11 05:51 UTC #2372

Wait a second! I got lots of essays in highschool and uni that i thought were uncalled for. Dont tell me Im a rapist!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-11 05:36 UTC #2369

Someone convicted of rape by a court was sentenced to write an essay? That is shocking, please tell us details? Unrelated to Jane Doe, but still an important story

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-10 22:03 UTC #2247

I did not mean to add the video my apologies

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

@janedoe12026-10-10 22:41 UTC #2267

No apologies needed. Mistakes happen.

However, if you want to create a username account so that later tou can edit, delete, your comments, that is an option.

Anonymous2026-10-10 21:45 UTC #2233

Imagine getting raped in your own house surrounded by 7 of your friends. Maybe if the other 57 they texted showed up they could have saved themselves. This site and everyone involved in this pathetic narrative should be buried to the ground

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-12 09:09 UTC #2802

The one guy who was concerned by the texts and showed up was also accused. She accused him of rape tho I think all we know is that he allegedly did ketamine off her body, based on a drug test around that time that was allegedly impossible tho

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-12 01:29 UTC #2708

You really are dumb –– "in your own house"? You can't even get the basic facts straight, so what "narrative" are you blindly following? She willingly participated in an orgy at the Chi Phi house, not her "own house." You also can't do basic math - 57 (total # of users in chat) - 7 (# of wrongfully accused defendants) = 50, not "the other 57." Therefore, you are incapable of basic human reasoning. I just need to accept the fact that stupid like you exist instead of wasting my precious time helping you with basic reasoning and quantitative skills.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-12 02:10 UTC #2715

Middle finger just because I pointed out the misinformation and arithmetic error, which were objectively incorrect? This proves just how dumb you people are. You can't handle basic logic and the truth.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-10 22:02 UTC #2246

Imagine someone wanting to return ti the location where she was "raped" to attend their Halloween party,

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-12 09:08 UTC #2801

She was the one uninvited for what she did that night btw. The boys were more uncomfortable.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-12 22:11 UTC #2942

Imagine the "fun" she would have had at that party

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-11 07:03 UTC #2391

Thats really damning, because i dont think she was hoping it would be drug and sex free

Anonymous2026-10-10 21:33 UTC #2229

take ur website down dork

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-11 06:53 UTC #2388

Go back to protesting on behalf of Democratic oligarchs and insider traders. Only job you can get.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe12026-10-10 22:42 UTC #2268

Nah, I am good.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-12 09:10 UTC #2803

actual NPCs reacting

Who IsJane DoeReally?

Controversial cases still require evidence, process, and room for dissent.

Reporting that helped frame the public questions

Articles & analysis

Take the Rice Purity Quiz As If You Were Lucy Craig

Rice Purity, Mom Lore, and Lucy Craig

Reproduction of Key Text Messages

The 20-Year Loophole?

Lucy Craig Wants Another 60 Days. The Court Should Say No.

BREAKING: Jacqueline Kelly, the Cornell Graduate Who Must Now Prove She Can Investigate Cornell

Documents should be inspectable, searchable, and quotable in context.

New docket entries · last 24 hours

Topics controlled by the administrators; comments controlled by their authors.

Latest comments

Comments & replies

Who Is
Jane Doe
Really?